%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN130-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:23:12 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 6 ( 0 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 10 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ m0(X1,X2,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(axiom_19,axiom,
m0(X1,d,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_19) ).
cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ m0(X1,X2,b),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ m0(X1,X2,b),
c_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
m0(X1,d,X2),
axiom_19 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SYN130-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:46:22 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % new_bool_1 with pid 2065604 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.15/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.45 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2065612 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.45 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.45
% 0.15/0.45 % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.45 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.15/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 160
% 0.15/0.45 % Initial clauses : 209
% 0.15/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.15/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 204
% 0.15/0.45 % Processed clauses : 58
% 0.15/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 6
% 0.15/0.45 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 52
% 0.15/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.15/0.45 % Generated clauses : 22
% 0.15/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 21
% 0.15/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Paramodulations : 22
% 0.15/0.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 14
% 0.15/0.45 % ...of those cached : 2
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 46
% 0.15/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 42
% 0.15/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 167
% 0.15/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 495
% 0.15/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 0.15/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10
% 0.15/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.15/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 8
% 0.15/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 6
% 0.15/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 7989
% 0.15/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1643
% 0.15/0.45
% 0.15/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.45 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.45 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.45 % Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.15/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4216 pages
% 0.15/0.45
% 0.15/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.45 % User time : 0.015 s
% 0.15/0.45 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.45 % Total time : 0.022 s
% 0.15/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.15/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------