%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN135-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:23:12 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 26 ( 0 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 12 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_088,axiom,
( ~ l0(a)
| p1(a,a,a) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_088) ).
cnf(rule_137,axiom,
( ~ p1(X2,X3,X1)
| n2(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_137) ).
cnf(axiom_20,axiom,
l0(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_20) ).
cnf(rule_236,axiom,
( ~ n2(X1)
| m3(X1,X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_236) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ m3(X1,X2,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ l0(a)
| p1(a,a,a) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_088]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ p1(X2,X3,X1)
| n2(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_137]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ l0(a)
| p1(a,a,a) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
l0(a),
axiom_20 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ n2(X1)
| m3(X1,X1,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_236]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ p1(X2,X3,X1)
| n2(X1) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
p1(a,a,a),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ m3(X1,X2,a),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ n2(X1)
| m3(X1,X1,X1) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
n2(a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ m3(X1,X2,a),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SYN135-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.35 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:46:01 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.35 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % new_bool_1 with pid 4088896 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.12/0.44 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.12/0.44 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % SubtermCWHack with pid 4088900 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.12/0.44 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.12/0.44 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.12/0.44
% 0.12/0.44 % Proof found!
% 0.12/0.44 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.44 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.44 % Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.12/0.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 60
% 0.12/0.44 % Initial clauses : 309
% 0.12/0.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.12/0.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 304
% 0.12/0.44 % Processed clauses : 123
% 0.12/0.44 % ...of these trivial : 9
% 0.12/0.44 % ...subsumed : 2
% 0.12/0.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 112
% 0.12/0.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.12/0.44 % Backward-rewritten : 18
% 0.12/0.44 % Generated clauses : 60
% 0.12/0.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 57
% 0.12/0.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Paramodulations : 60
% 0.12/0.44 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % NegExts : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Total rewrite steps : 45
% 0.12/0.44 % ...of those cached : 17
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 92
% 0.12/0.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 67
% 0.12/0.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.12/0.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 24
% 0.12/0.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 233
% 0.12/0.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 739
% 0.12/0.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 20
% 0.12/0.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 215
% 0.12/0.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 195
% 0.12/0.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.12/0.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20
% 0.12/0.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 19
% 0.12/0.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 17
% 0.12/0.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 11098
% 0.12/0.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1540
% 0.12/0.44
% 0.12/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.44 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.12/0.44 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.12/0.44 % Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.12/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4472 pages
% 0.12/0.44
% 0.12/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.44 % User time : 0.014 s
% 0.12/0.44 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.12/0.44 % Total time : 0.026 s
% 0.12/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.12/0.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------