%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN137-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:32:36 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 16
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 58 ( 24 unt; 0 nHn; 46 RR)
% Number of literals : 124 ( 0 equ; 71 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 12 ( 11 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 76 ( 27 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_126,axiom,
( ~ s1(X3)
| ~ q0(X1,X2)
| s1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_126) ).
cnf(rule_125,axiom,
( ~ p0(X1,X1)
| s1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_125) ).
cnf(axiom_17,axiom,
q0(X1,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_17) ).
cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_14) ).
cnf(rule_133,axiom,
( ~ m0(X4,X3,X1)
| ~ s1(X3)
| ~ p0(X2,X2)
| l2(X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_133) ).
cnf(rule_189,axiom,
( ~ s1(b)
| ~ q2(b,X1,b)
| s2(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_189) ).
cnf(rule_131,axiom,
( ~ l2(X2,X2)
| ~ n0(e,X2)
| ~ s1(X1)
| l2(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_131) ).
cnf(axiom_19,axiom,
m0(X1,d,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_19) ).
cnf(rule_237,axiom,
( ~ q2(X1,c,c)
| ~ s2(c)
| m3(X1,c,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_237) ).
cnf(rule_183,axiom,
( ~ l2(X2,X1)
| ~ l0(c)
| ~ k1(X2)
| q2(X1,c,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_183) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ m3(b,c,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(axiom_24,axiom,
l0(c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_24) ).
cnf(rule_001,axiom,
( ~ n0(X2,X1)
| k1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_001) ).
cnf(axiom_26,axiom,
n0(d,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_26) ).
cnf(axiom_11,axiom,
n0(e,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_11) ).
cnf(axiom_15,axiom,
n0(a,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_15) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ s1(X3)
| ~ q0(X1,X2)
| s1(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_126]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ p0(X1,X1)
| s1(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_125]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ s1(X3)
| ~ q0(X1,X2)
| s1(X1) ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
q0(X1,d),
axiom_17 ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ p0(X1,X1)
| s1(X1) ),
c_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
axiom_14 ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ m0(X4,X3,X1)
| ~ s1(X3)
| ~ p0(X2,X2)
| l2(X1,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_133]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ s1(X2)
| s1(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
s1(b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ m0(X4,X3,X1)
| ~ s1(X3)
| ~ p0(X2,X2)
| l2(X1,X1) ),
c_0_22 ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
s1(X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ s1(b)
| ~ q2(b,X1,b)
| s2(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_189]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ l2(X2,X2)
| ~ n0(e,X2)
| ~ s1(X1)
| l2(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_131]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ m0(X3,X4,X1)
| ~ p0(X2,X2)
| l2(X1,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
m0(X1,d,X2),
axiom_19 ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ q2(X1,c,c)
| ~ s2(c)
| m3(X1,c,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_237]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ s1(b)
| ~ q2(b,X1,b)
| s2(X1) ),
c_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( ~ l2(X2,X1)
| ~ l0(c)
| ~ k1(X2)
| q2(X1,c,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_183]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ l2(X2,X2)
| ~ n0(e,X2)
| ~ s1(X1)
| l2(X1,X2) ),
c_0_28 ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( ~ p0(X2,X2)
| l2(X1,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
~ m3(b,c,b),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ q2(X1,c,c)
| ~ s2(c)
| m3(X1,c,X1) ),
c_0_31 ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( ~ q2(b,X1,b)
| s2(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( ~ l2(X2,X1)
| ~ l0(c)
| ~ k1(X2)
| q2(X1,c,X2) ),
c_0_33 ).
cnf(c_0_40,axiom,
l0(c),
axiom_24 ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( ~ n0(e,X2)
| ~ l2(X2,X2)
| l2(X1,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
l2(X1,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( ~ n0(X2,X1)
| k1(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_001]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
~ m3(b,c,b),
c_0_36 ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( ~ q2(X1,c,c)
| ~ q2(b,c,b)
| m3(X1,c,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
( ~ k1(X2)
| ~ l2(X2,X1)
| q2(X1,c,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40])]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
( ~ n0(e,X2)
| l2(X1,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42])]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
( ~ n0(X2,X1)
| k1(X1) ),
c_0_43 ).
cnf(c_0_49,axiom,
n0(d,c),
axiom_26 ).
cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
( ~ q2(b,c,c)
| ~ q2(b,c,b) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
( ~ n0(e,X1)
| ~ k1(X2)
| q2(X1,c,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
k1(c),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,axiom,
n0(e,b),
axiom_11 ).
cnf(c_0_54,axiom,
n0(a,b),
axiom_15 ).
cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
~ q2(b,c,b),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]),c_0_52]),c_0_53])]) ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
k1(b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_54]) ).
cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_51]),c_0_56]),c_0_53])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN137-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.36 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:44:19 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.48 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.16/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.48 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 % new_bool_1 with pid 2361147 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.16/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.48 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.16/0.48 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.48 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.48 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2361155 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.16/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.48 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.16/0.48 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.48 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.48 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 % Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.48
% 0.16/0.48 % Proof found!
% 0.16/0.48 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.48 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.48 % Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.16/0.48 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 60
% 0.16/0.48 % Initial clauses : 309
% 0.16/0.48 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.16/0.48 % Initial clauses in saturation : 304
% 0.16/0.48 % Processed clauses : 833
% 0.16/0.48 % ...of these trivial : 117
% 0.16/0.48 % ...subsumed : 45
% 0.16/0.48 % ...remaining for further processing : 671
% 0.16/0.48 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Backward-subsumed : 69
% 0.16/0.48 % Backward-rewritten : 205
% 0.16/0.48 % Generated clauses : 1000
% 0.16/0.48 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 684
% 0.16/0.48 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.16/0.48 % Paramodulations : 1000
% 0.16/0.48 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Total rewrite steps : 868
% 0.16/0.48 % ...of those cached : 545
% 0.16/0.48 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.48 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.48 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.48 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.48 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.48 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.48 % Current number of processed clauses : 397
% 0.16/0.48 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 184
% 0.16/0.48 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.16/0.48 % Non-unit-clauses : 210
% 0.16/0.48 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 53
% 0.16/0.48 % ...number of literals in the above : 206
% 0.16/0.48 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Current number of archived clauses : 274
% 0.16/0.48 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 11681
% 0.16/0.48 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10418
% 0.16/0.48 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 97
% 0.16/0.48 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1053
% 0.16/0.48 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % BW rewrite match attempts : 383
% 0.16/0.48 % BW rewrite match successes : 178
% 0.16/0.48 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Termbank termtop insertions : 21579
% 0.16/0.48 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1540
% 0.16/0.48
% 0.16/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.48 % User time : 0.044 s
% 0.16/0.48 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.16/0.48 % Total time : 0.050 s
% 0.16/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 4440 pages
% 0.16/0.48
% 0.16/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.48 % User time : 0.050 s
% 0.16/0.48 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.16/0.48 % Total time : 0.062 s
% 0.16/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.16/0.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------