↑ Up

Metis---2.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : SYN138-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 08:59:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.38s 0.55s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   49 (  21 unt;   0 nHn;  41 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   93 (   0 equ;  45 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   15 (  14 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (  15 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_1,axiom,
    s0(d) ).

cnf(axiom_3,axiom,
    n0(d,e) ).

cnf(axiom_17,axiom,
    q0(X,d) ).

cnf(axiom_19,axiom,
    m0(X,d,Y) ).

cnf(axiom_24,axiom,
    l0(c) ).

cnf(axiom_28,axiom,
    k0(e) ).

cnf(rule_001,axiom,
    ( k1(I)
    | ~ n0(J,I) ) ).

cnf(rule_002,axiom,
    ( l1(G,G)
    | ~ n0(H,G) ) ).

cnf(rule_021,axiom,
    ( m1(I,J,I)
    | ~ l0(I)
    | ~ k0(J) ) ).

cnf(rule_110,axiom,
    ( q1(B,B,B)
    | ~ m0(C,D,B) ) ).

cnf(rule_124,axiom,
    ( r1(D)
    | ~ q0(D,E)
    | ~ s0(d)
    | ~ q1(d,E,d) ) ).

cnf(rule_127,axiom,
    ( k2(C,D)
    | ~ m1(E,D,C)
    | ~ k1(F)
    | ~ k2(F,D) ) ).

cnf(rule_130,axiom,
    ( k2(e,e)
    | ~ l1(e,e) ) ).

cnf(rule_188,axiom,
    ( r2(G)
    | ~ r1(G)
    | ~ l0(G) ) ).

cnf(rule_231,axiom,
    ( m3(H,I,H)
    | ~ r2(H)
    | ~ k2(c,I) ) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ m3(c,e,c) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    ( ~ l0(X_193)
    | ~ r1(X_193)
    | r2(X_193) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_188:[bind(G,$fot(X_193))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    q0(X_191,d),
    inference(subst,[],[axiom_17:[bind(X,$fot(X_191))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    ( ~ q0(D,E)
    | ~ q1(d,E,d)
    | r1(D) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( s0(d) )],[axiom_1,rule_124]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    ( ~ q0(X_191,d)
    | ~ q1(d,d,d)
    | r1(X_191) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_2:[bind(D,$fot(X_191)),bind(E,$fot(d))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    ( ~ q1(d,d,d)
    | r1(X_191) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( q0(X_191,d) )],[refute_0_1,refute_0_3]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    m0(X_153,d,X_152),
    inference(subst,[],[axiom_19:[bind(X,$fot(X_153)),bind(Y,$fot(X_152))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    ( ~ m0(X_153,d,X_152)
    | q1(X_152,X_152,X_152) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_110:[bind(B,$fot(X_152)),bind(C,$fot(X_153)),bind(D,$fot(d))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    q1(X_152,X_152,X_152),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( m0(X_153,d,X_152) )],[refute_0_5,refute_0_6]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    q1(d,d,d),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_7:[bind(X_152,$fot(d))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    r1(X_191),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( q1(d,d,d) )],[refute_0_8,refute_0_4]) ).

cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
    r1(X_193),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_9:[bind(X_191,$fot(X_193))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ l0(X_193)
    | r2(X_193) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( r1(X_193) )],[refute_0_10,refute_0_0]) ).

cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ l0(c)
    | r2(c) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_11:[bind(X_193,$fot(c))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
    r2(c),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( l0(c) )],[axiom_24,refute_0_12]) ).

cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ k2(c,e)
    | ~ r2(H)
    | m3(H,e,H) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_231:[bind(I,$fot(e))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ n0(d,e)
    | l1(e,e) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_002:[bind(G,$fot(e)),bind(H,$fot(d))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
    l1(e,e),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( n0(d,e) )],[axiom_3,refute_0_15]) ).

cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
    k2(e,e),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( l1(e,e) )],[refute_0_16,rule_130]) ).

cnf(refute_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ k0(X_165)
    | ~ l0(c)
    | m1(c,X_165,c) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_021:[bind(I,$fot(c)),bind(J,$fot(X_165))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ k0(X_165)
    | m1(c,X_165,c) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( l0(c) )],[axiom_24,refute_0_18]) ).

cnf(refute_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ k0(e)
    | m1(c,e,c) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_19:[bind(X_165,$fot(e))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_21,plain,
    m1(c,e,c),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( k0(e) )],[axiom_28,refute_0_20]) ).

cnf(refute_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ k1(X_726)
    | ~ k2(X_726,e)
    | ~ m1(c,e,c)
    | k2(c,e) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_127:[bind(C,$fot(c)),bind(D,$fot(e)),bind(E,$fot(c)),bind(F,$fot(X_726))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ k1(X_726)
    | ~ k2(X_726,e)
    | k2(c,e) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( m1(c,e,c) )],[refute_0_21,refute_0_22]) ).

cnf(refute_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ k1(e)
    | ~ k2(e,e)
    | k2(c,e) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_23:[bind(X_726,$fot(e))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ k1(e)
    | k2(c,e) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( k2(e,e) )],[refute_0_17,refute_0_24]) ).

cnf(refute_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ n0(d,e)
    | k1(e) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_001:[bind(I,$fot(e)),bind(J,$fot(d))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_27,plain,
    k1(e),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( n0(d,e) )],[axiom_3,refute_0_26]) ).

cnf(refute_0_28,plain,
    k2(c,e),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( k1(e) )],[refute_0_27,refute_0_25]) ).

cnf(refute_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ r2(H)
    | m3(H,e,H) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( k2(c,e) )],[refute_0_28,refute_0_14]) ).

cnf(refute_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ r2(c)
    | m3(c,e,c) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_29:[bind(H,$fot(c))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_31,plain,
    m3(c,e,c),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( r2(c) )],[refute_0_13,refute_0_30]) ).

cnf(refute_0_32,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( m3(c,e,c) )],[refute_0_31,prove_this]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SYN138-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 04:54:06 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.38/0.55  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/0.55  
% 0.38/0.55  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.38/0.55  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------