↑ Up

Metis---2.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : SYN141-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 08:59:58 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   42 (  21 unt;   0 nHn;  35 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   73 (   0 equ;  33 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   13 (  12 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (  11 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_9,axiom,
    r0(b) ).

cnf(axiom_18,axiom,
    p0(c,b) ).

cnf(axiom_19,axiom,
    m0(X,d,Y) ).

cnf(axiom_27,axiom,
    m0(e,b,c) ).

cnf(axiom_30,axiom,
    n0(e,e) ).

cnf(axiom_34,axiom,
    n0(c,d) ).

cnf(rule_003,axiom,
    ( l1(C,D)
    | ~ p0(E,C)
    | ~ r0(F)
    | ~ m0(D,C,E) ) ).

cnf(rule_006,axiom,
    ( m1(J,J,J)
    | ~ m0(A,A,J) ) ).

cnf(rule_150,axiom,
    ( p2(F,F,F)
    | ~ m1(G,G,F) ) ).

cnf(rule_186,axiom,
    ( q2(G,G,H)
    | ~ l1(H,G) ) ).

cnf(rule_240,axiom,
    ( n3(D)
    | ~ p2(E,F,D) ) ).

cnf(rule_255,axiom,
    ( q3(G,H)
    | ~ q2(I,G,H)
    | ~ n0(I,G) ) ).

cnf(rule_274,axiom,
    ( k4(c)
    | ~ n0(c,d)
    | ~ q3(e,b)
    | ~ n3(e) ) ).

cnf(rule_304,axiom,
    ( m5(C,C)
    | ~ k4(C) ) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ m5(c,X) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    ( ~ k4(c)
    | m5(c,c) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_304:[bind(C,$fot(c))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    ( ~ n3(e)
    | ~ q3(e,b)
    | k4(c) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( n0(c,d) )],[axiom_34,rule_274]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    ( ~ n0(e,e)
    | ~ q2(e,e,b)
    | q3(e,b) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_255:[bind(G,$fot(e)),bind(H,$fot(b)),bind(I,$fot(e))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    ( ~ l1(b,e)
    | q2(e,e,b) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_186:[bind(G,$fot(e)),bind(H,$fot(b))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    ( ~ m0(e,b,c)
    | ~ p0(c,b)
    | ~ r0(X_707)
    | l1(b,e) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_003:[bind(C,$fot(b)),bind(D,$fot(e)),bind(E,$fot(c)),bind(F,$fot(X_707))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    ( ~ p0(c,b)
    | ~ r0(X_707)
    | l1(b,e) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( m0(e,b,c) )],[axiom_27,refute_0_4]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    ( ~ r0(X_707)
    | l1(b,e) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( p0(c,b) )],[axiom_18,refute_0_5]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    ( ~ r0(b)
    | l1(b,e) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_6:[bind(X_707,$fot(b))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    l1(b,e),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( r0(b) )],[axiom_9,refute_0_7]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    q2(e,e,b),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( l1(b,e) )],[refute_0_8,refute_0_3]) ).

cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ n0(e,e)
    | q3(e,b) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( q2(e,e,b) )],[refute_0_9,refute_0_2]) ).

cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
    q3(e,b),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( n0(e,e) )],[axiom_30,refute_0_10]) ).

cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ n3(e)
    | k4(c) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( q3(e,b) )],[refute_0_11,refute_0_1]) ).

cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
    m0(d,d,X_95),
    inference(subst,[],[axiom_19:[bind(X,$fot(d)),bind(Y,$fot(X_95))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ m0(d,d,X_95)
    | m1(X_95,X_95,X_95) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_006:[bind(A,$fot(d)),bind(J,$fot(X_95))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
    m1(X_95,X_95,X_95),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( m0(d,d,X_95) )],[refute_0_13,refute_0_14]) ).

cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
    m1(X_114,X_114,X_114),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_15:[bind(X_95,$fot(X_114))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ m1(X_114,X_114,X_114)
    | p2(X_114,X_114,X_114) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_150:[bind(F,$fot(X_114)),bind(G,$fot(X_114))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_18,plain,
    p2(X_114,X_114,X_114),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( m1(X_114,X_114,X_114) )],[refute_0_16,refute_0_17]) ).

cnf(refute_0_19,plain,
    p2(X_122,X_122,X_122),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_18:[bind(X_114,$fot(X_122))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ p2(X_122,X_122,X_122)
    | n3(X_122) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_240:[bind(D,$fot(X_122)),bind(E,$fot(X_122)),bind(F,$fot(X_122))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_21,plain,
    n3(X_122),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( p2(X_122,X_122,X_122) )],[refute_0_19,refute_0_20]) ).

cnf(refute_0_22,plain,
    n3(e),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_21:[bind(X_122,$fot(e))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_23,plain,
    k4(c),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( n3(e) )],[refute_0_22,refute_0_12]) ).

cnf(refute_0_24,plain,
    m5(c,c),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( k4(c) )],[refute_0_23,refute_0_0]) ).

cnf(refute_0_25,plain,
    ~ m5(c,c),
    inference(subst,[],[prove_this:[bind(X,$fot(c))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_26,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( m5(c,c) )],[refute_0_24,refute_0_25]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SYN141-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 03:12:54 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.19/0.53  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.53  
% 0.19/0.53  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.53  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------