%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN148-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:32:38 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.08s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.08s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 26 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 50 ( 0 equ; 27 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 7 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_050,axiom,
( ~ p0(b,X2)
| ~ l0(X1)
| ~ s0(b)
| n1(X1,X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_050) ).
cnf(axiom_5,axiom,
s0(b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_5) ).
cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_14) ).
cnf(rule_054,axiom,
( ~ n1(X1,X2,X1)
| ~ l1(X3,X1)
| ~ l0(X3)
| n1(X1,X2,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_054) ).
cnf(axiom_24,axiom,
l0(c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_24) ).
cnf(rule_002,axiom,
( ~ n0(X2,X1)
| l1(X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_002) ).
cnf(axiom_26,axiom,
n0(d,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_26) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ n1(c,d,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ p0(b,X2)
| ~ l0(X1)
| ~ s0(b)
| n1(X1,X2,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_050]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ p0(b,X2)
| ~ l0(X1)
| ~ s0(b)
| n1(X1,X2,X1) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
s0(b),
axiom_5 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
axiom_14 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ n1(X1,X2,X1)
| ~ l1(X3,X1)
| ~ l0(X3)
| n1(X1,X2,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_054]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ l0(X1)
| n1(X1,X2,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
l0(c),
axiom_24 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ n0(X2,X1)
| l1(X1,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_002]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ n1(X1,X2,X1)
| ~ l1(X3,X1)
| ~ l0(X3)
| n1(X1,X2,X2) ),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
n1(c,X1,c),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ n0(X2,X1)
| l1(X1,X1) ),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
n0(d,c),
axiom_26 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ n1(c,d,d),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ l0(X2)
| ~ l1(X2,c)
| n1(c,X1,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
l1(c,c),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
~ n1(c,d,d),
c_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
n1(c,X1,X1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SYN148-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.35 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:45:24 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.39 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.08/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.08/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.45 % new_bool_3 with pid 787357 completed with status 0
% 0.08/0.45 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.08/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.08/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.08/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.08/0.45 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.08/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.08/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 787363 completed with status 0
% 0.08/0.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.08/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.08/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.08/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.08/0.45 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.08/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.08/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.08/0.45
% 0.08/0.45 % Proof found!
% 0.08/0.45 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.08/0.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.08/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.08/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 160
% 0.08/0.45 % Initial clauses : 209
% 0.08/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.08/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 204
% 0.08/0.45 % Processed clauses : 453
% 0.08/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 54
% 0.08/0.45 % ...subsumed : 19
% 0.08/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 380
% 0.08/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.08/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.08/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 40
% 0.08/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 124
% 0.08/0.45 % Generated clauses : 522
% 0.08/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 325
% 0.08/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.08/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.08/0.45 % Paramodulations : 522
% 0.08/0.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.08/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.08/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.08/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.08/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 467
% 0.08/0.45 % ...of those cached : 286
% 0.08/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.08/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.08/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.08/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.08/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.08/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.08/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 216
% 0.08/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 116
% 0.08/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.08/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.08/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 100
% 0.08/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 30
% 0.08/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 105
% 0.08/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.08/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 164
% 0.08/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4985
% 0.08/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4269
% 0.08/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 56
% 0.08/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 388
% 0.08/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.08/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 258
% 0.08/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 104
% 0.08/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.08/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.08/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 13535
% 0.08/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1643
% 0.08/0.45
% 0.08/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.08/0.45 % User time : 0.025 s
% 0.08/0.45 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.08/0.45 % Total time : 0.029 s
% 0.08/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4216 pages
% 0.08/0.45
% 0.08/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.08/0.45 % User time : 0.030 s
% 0.08/0.45 % System time : 0.011 s
% 0.08/0.45 % Total time : 0.041 s
% 0.08/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.08/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------