↑ Up

Twee---2.7.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : SYN151-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:47:11 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.41s 0.90s
% Output   : Proof 5.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN151-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.18  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.18  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 15:38:57 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.18  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.41/0.90  Command-line arguments: --flatten --complete-subsets
% 4.41/0.90  
% 4.41/0.90  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.41/0.90  
% 5.23/0.90  % SZS output start Proof
% 5.23/0.90  Axiom 1 (axiom_13): r0(e) = true.
% 5.23/0.90  Axiom 2 (axiom_1): s0(d) = true.
% 5.23/0.90  Axiom 3 (axiom_14): p0(b, X) = true.
% 5.23/0.90  Axiom 4 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 5.23/0.90  Axiom 5 (rule_137): ifeq(p1(X, Y, Z), true, n2(Z), true) = true.
% 5.23/0.90  Axiom 6 (rule_085): ifeq(p0(X, Y), true, p1(Y, Y, Y), true) = true.
% 5.23/0.90  
% 5.23/0.90  Lemma 7: s0(d) = r0(e).
% 5.23/0.90  Proof:
% 5.23/0.90    s0(d)
% 5.23/0.90  = { by axiom 2 (axiom_1) }
% 5.23/0.90    true
% 5.23/0.90  = { by axiom 1 (axiom_13) R->L }
% 5.23/0.90    r0(e)
% 5.23/0.90  
% 5.23/0.90  Goal 1 (prove_this): n2(d) = true.
% 5.23/0.90  Proof:
% 5.23/0.90    n2(d)
% 5.23/0.90  = { by axiom 4 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 5.23/0.90    ifeq(s0(d), s0(d), n2(d), s0(d))
% 5.23/0.90  = { by lemma 7 }
% 5.23/0.90    ifeq(r0(e), s0(d), n2(d), s0(d))
% 5.23/0.90  = { by axiom 1 (axiom_13) }
% 5.23/0.90    ifeq(true, s0(d), n2(d), s0(d))
% 5.23/0.90  = { by axiom 6 (rule_085) R->L }
% 5.23/0.90    ifeq(ifeq(p0(b, d), true, p1(d, d, d), true), s0(d), n2(d), s0(d))
% 5.23/0.91  = { by axiom 1 (axiom_13) R->L }
% 5.23/0.91    ifeq(ifeq(p0(b, d), true, p1(d, d, d), r0(e)), s0(d), n2(d), s0(d))
% 5.23/0.91  = { by axiom 1 (axiom_13) R->L }
% 5.23/0.91    ifeq(ifeq(p0(b, d), r0(e), p1(d, d, d), r0(e)), s0(d), n2(d), s0(d))
% 5.23/0.91  = { by lemma 7 R->L }
% 5.23/0.91    ifeq(ifeq(p0(b, d), r0(e), p1(d, d, d), s0(d)), s0(d), n2(d), s0(d))
% 5.23/0.91  = { by lemma 7 R->L }
% 5.23/0.91    ifeq(ifeq(p0(b, d), s0(d), p1(d, d, d), s0(d)), s0(d), n2(d), s0(d))
% 5.23/0.91  = { by axiom 3 (axiom_14) }
% 5.23/0.91    ifeq(ifeq(true, s0(d), p1(d, d, d), s0(d)), s0(d), n2(d), s0(d))
% 5.23/0.91  = { by axiom 1 (axiom_13) R->L }
% 5.23/0.91    ifeq(ifeq(r0(e), s0(d), p1(d, d, d), s0(d)), s0(d), n2(d), s0(d))
% 5.23/0.91  = { by lemma 7 R->L }
% 5.23/0.91    ifeq(ifeq(s0(d), s0(d), p1(d, d, d), s0(d)), s0(d), n2(d), s0(d))
% 5.23/0.91  = { by axiom 4 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 5.23/0.91    ifeq(p1(d, d, d), s0(d), n2(d), s0(d))
% 5.23/0.91  = { by lemma 7 }
% 5.23/0.91    ifeq(p1(d, d, d), r0(e), n2(d), s0(d))
% 5.23/0.91  = { by lemma 7 }
% 5.23/0.91    ifeq(p1(d, d, d), r0(e), n2(d), r0(e))
% 5.23/0.91  = { by axiom 1 (axiom_13) }
% 5.23/0.91    ifeq(p1(d, d, d), true, n2(d), r0(e))
% 5.23/0.91  = { by axiom 1 (axiom_13) }
% 5.23/0.91    ifeq(p1(d, d, d), true, n2(d), true)
% 5.23/0.91  = { by axiom 5 (rule_137) }
% 5.23/0.91    true
% 5.23/0.91  % SZS output end Proof
% 5.23/0.91  
% 5.23/0.91  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------