↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYN154-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:16:54 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 134.08s 80.81s
% Output   : Refutation 134.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  12 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   75 (   8 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  180 (  31   ~;  28   |;   0   &; 121   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   0   ^;  39   !;   0   ?;  39   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(n3_decl,type,
    n3: $i > $o ).

thf(e_decl,type,
    e: $i ).

thf(a_decl,type,
    a: $i ).

thf(m1_decl,type,
    m1: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(p2_decl,type,
    p2: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(k0_decl,type,
    k0: $i > $o ).

thf(l0_decl,type,
    l0: $i > $o ).

thf(317,axiom,
    e @ k0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_28) ).

thf(972,plain,
    e @ k0,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[317]) ).

thf(173,axiom,
    a @ l0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_20) ).

thf(699,plain,
    a @ l0,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[173]) ).

thf(32,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ k0 )
      | ~ ( A @ l0 )
      | ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ m1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_021) ).

thf(430,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ k0 )
      | ~ ( A @ l0 )
      | ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ m1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[32]) ).

thf(431,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ k0 )
      | ~ ( A @ l0 )
      | ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ m1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[430]) ).

thf(4407,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( a @ l0 )
       != ( A @ l0 ) )
      | ~ ( B @ k0 )
      | ~ $true
      | ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ m1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[699,431]) ).

thf(4408,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( a @ l0 )
       != ( A @ l0 ) )
      | ~ ( B @ k0 )
      | ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ m1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[4407]) ).

thf(4409,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ k0 )
      | ( a @ ( A @ ( a @ m1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[4408:[bind(A,$thf( a ))]]) ).

thf(4420,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ k0 )
      | ( a @ ( A @ ( a @ m1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[4409]) ).

thf(5170,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( e @ k0 )
       != ( A @ k0 ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( a @ ( A @ ( a @ m1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[972,4420]) ).

thf(5171,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( e @ k0 )
       != ( A @ k0 ) )
      | ( a @ ( A @ ( a @ m1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[5170]) ).

thf(5172,plain,
    a @ ( e @ ( a @ m1 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[5171:[bind(A,$thf( e ))]]) ).

thf(181,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ ( A @ ( B @ m1 ) ) )
      | ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ p2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_176) ).

thf(714,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ ( A @ ( B @ m1 ) ) )
      | ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ p2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[181]) ).

thf(715,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ ( A @ ( B @ m1 ) ) )
      | ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ p2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[714]) ).

thf(23366,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( a @ ( e @ ( a @ m1 ) ) )
       != ( B @ ( A @ ( B @ m1 ) ) ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ p2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[5172,715]) ).

thf(23367,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( a @ ( e @ ( a @ m1 ) ) )
       != ( B @ ( A @ ( B @ m1 ) ) ) )
      | ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ p2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[23366]) ).

thf(23368,plain,
    e @ ( a @ ( e @ p2 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[23367:[bind(A,$thf( e )),bind(B,$thf( a ))]]) ).

thf(322,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ ( C @ ( B @ p2 ) ) )
      | ( A @ n3 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_240) ).

thf(980,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ ( C @ ( B @ p2 ) ) )
      | ( A @ n3 ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[322]) ).

thf(981,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ ( C @ ( B @ p2 ) ) )
      | ( A @ n3 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[980]) ).

thf(47153,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( e @ ( a @ ( e @ p2 ) ) )
       != ( A @ ( C @ ( B @ p2 ) ) ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( A @ n3 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[23368,981]) ).

thf(47154,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( e @ ( a @ ( e @ p2 ) ) )
       != ( A @ ( C @ ( B @ p2 ) ) ) )
      | ( A @ n3 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[47153]) ).

thf(47155,plain,
    e @ n3,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[47154:[bind(A,$thf( e )),bind(B,$thf( e )),bind(C,$thf( a ))]]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( e @ n3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

thf(370,plain,
    ~ ( e @ n3 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(371,plain,
    ~ ( e @ n3 ),
    inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[370]) ).

thf(47330,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[47155,371]) ).

thf(47331,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[47330]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SYN154-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.09/5.38   % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.38   % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.38   % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.38   % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.38   % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.22/20.56  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.22/20.56  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.22/20.56  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 17:15:57 UTC 2026
% 0.22/20.57  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/20.57  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.44/21.05  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 2.58/21.50  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (444ms). 
% 2.58/21.52  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 3.94/22.05  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 3.94/22.06  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 4.29/22.25  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 368 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 4.90/22.47  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 368 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 5.58/22.66  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 5.58/22.67  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 5.58/22.68  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 134.08/80.80  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 134.08/80.81  % Time passed: 60098ms (effective reasoning time: 59276ms)
% 134.08/80.81  % Axioms used in derivation (5): rule_176, axiom_20, rule_240, axiom_28, rule_021
% 134.08/80.81  % No. of inferences in proof: 31
% 134.08/80.81  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 60098 ms resp. 59276 ms w/o parsing
% 134.08/80.84  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 134.08/80.84  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------