%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.7
% Problem : SYN154-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:47:12 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.00s 0.68s
% Output : Proof 3.00s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN154-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.18 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.18 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.18 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.18 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.18 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.18 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18 % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 15:35:10 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.18 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.18 Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.00/0.68 Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 9 --flip-ordering --complete-subsets --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10
% 3.00/0.68
% 3.00/0.68 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.00/0.68
% 3.00/0.68 % SZS output start Proof
% 3.00/0.68 Axiom 1 (axiom_19): m0(X, d, Y) = true.
% 3.00/0.68 Axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 3.00/0.68 Axiom 3 (rule_240): ifeq(p2(X, Y, Z), true, n3(Z), true) = true.
% 3.00/0.68 Axiom 4 (rule_006): ifeq(m0(X, X, Y), true, m1(Y, Y, Y), true) = true.
% 3.00/0.68 Axiom 5 (rule_150): ifeq(m1(X, X, Y), true, p2(Y, Y, Y), true) = true.
% 3.00/0.68
% 3.00/0.68 Goal 1 (prove_this): n3(e) = true.
% 3.00/0.68 Proof:
% 3.00/0.68 n3(e)
% 3.00/0.68 = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 3.00/0.68 ifeq(true, true, n3(e), true)
% 3.00/0.68 = { by axiom 5 (rule_150) R->L }
% 3.00/0.68 ifeq(ifeq(m1(e, e, e), true, p2(e, e, e), true), true, n3(e), true)
% 3.00/0.68 = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 3.00/0.68 ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, m1(e, e, e), true), true, p2(e, e, e), true), true, n3(e), true)
% 3.00/0.68 = { by axiom 1 (axiom_19) R->L }
% 3.00/0.68 ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(m0(d, d, e), true, m1(e, e, e), true), true, p2(e, e, e), true), true, n3(e), true)
% 3.00/0.68 = { by axiom 4 (rule_006) }
% 3.00/0.68 ifeq(ifeq(true, true, p2(e, e, e), true), true, n3(e), true)
% 3.00/0.68 = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 3.00/0.68 ifeq(p2(e, e, e), true, n3(e), true)
% 3.00/0.68 = { by axiom 3 (rule_240) }
% 3.00/0.68 true
% 3.00/0.68 % SZS output end Proof
% 3.00/0.68
% 3.00/0.68 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------