%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN169-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:23:17 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 26 ( 0 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 17 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_067,axiom,
( ~ q0(X2,X1)
| p1(X1,X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_067) ).
cnf(rule_137,axiom,
( ~ p1(X2,X3,X1)
| n2(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_137) ).
cnf(axiom_17,axiom,
q0(X1,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_17) ).
cnf(rule_244,axiom,
( ~ n2(X1)
| p3(X1,X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_244) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ p3(X1,d,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ q0(X2,X1)
| p1(X1,X1,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_067]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ p1(X2,X3,X1)
| n2(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_137]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ q0(X2,X1)
| p1(X1,X1,X1) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
q0(X1,d),
axiom_17 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ n2(X1)
| p3(X1,X1,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_244]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ p1(X2,X3,X1)
| n2(X1) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
p1(d,d,d),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ p3(X1,d,X2),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ n2(X1)
| p3(X1,X1,X1) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
n2(d),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ p3(X1,d,X2),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SYN169-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.34 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.34 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.34 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:45:12 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.34 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.38 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.38 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.41 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.41 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.41 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 1547413 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.13/0.41 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.41 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.41 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.41 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.41 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1547417 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.13/0.41 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.41 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.41 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.41 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.41 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.41
% 0.13/0.41 % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.41 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.41 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.41 % Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.13/0.41 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Initial clauses : 369
% 0.13/0.41 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 7
% 0.13/0.41 % Initial clauses in saturation : 362
% 0.13/0.41 % Processed clauses : 182
% 0.13/0.41 % ...of these trivial : 11
% 0.13/0.41 % ...subsumed : 1
% 0.13/0.41 % ...remaining for further processing : 170
% 0.13/0.41 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.13/0.41 % Backward-rewritten : 24
% 0.13/0.41 % Generated clauses : 103
% 0.13/0.41 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 88
% 0.13/0.41 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Paramodulations : 103
% 0.13/0.41 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % NegExts : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Total rewrite steps : 68
% 0.13/0.41 % ...of those cached : 23
% 0.13/0.41 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41 % Current number of processed clauses : 143
% 0.13/0.41 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 95
% 0.13/0.41 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.13/0.41 % Non-unit-clauses : 47
% 0.13/0.41 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 258
% 0.13/0.41 % ...number of literals in the above : 849
% 0.13/0.41 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Current number of archived clauses : 27
% 0.13/0.41 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 829
% 0.13/0.41 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 732
% 0.13/0.41 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.13/0.41 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 81
% 0.13/0.41 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % BW rewrite match attempts : 33
% 0.13/0.41 % BW rewrite match successes : 23
% 0.13/0.41 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Termbank termtop insertions : 13053
% 0.13/0.41 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1461
% 0.13/0.41
% 0.13/0.41 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.41 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.13/0.41 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.13/0.41 % Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.13/0.41 % Maximum resident set size: 4472 pages
% 0.13/0.41
% 0.13/0.41 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.41 % User time : 0.059 s
% 0.13/0.41 % System time : 0.019 s
% 0.13/0.41 % Total time : 0.078 s
% 0.13/0.41 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.13/0.41 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------