↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SYN176-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:10:41 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.70s 0.90s
% Output   : Refutation 0.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem  : SYN176-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 04:07:19 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.37  The process was started by sandbox2 on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.37  Tue Jul 12 04:07:19 2022
% 0.12/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 13503.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 0.12/0.37  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.12/0.37  in usable.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 13 during input processing: 0 [] {-} m1(A,A,A)| -q0(B,C)| -q0(B,A).
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 14 during input processing: 0 [] {-} m1(A,A,A)| -m0(B,C,A).
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 14 during input processing: 0 [] {-} m1(A,A,A)| -l0(A)| -k0(A)| -m0(A,A,A).
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [] {-} m1(e,e,e)| -r0(e).
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 63 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p1(A,A,A)| -n0(e,b)| -k0(b)| -k0(A)| -k1(B).
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 64 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p1(A,A,B)| -p0(B,A)| -r0(A).
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 63 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p1(e,e,e)| -r0(e)| -k0(e).
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 88 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -s0(A)| -m0(B,B,C).
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 88 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -s0(A).
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 88 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(d,d,d)| -k0(e)| -s0(d).
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 105 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(b,b,b)| -r0(b).
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 99 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -m0(B,C,A).
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 99 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -m0(A,B,A).
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 105 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -m0(c,A,A)| -r0(A).
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 142 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p2(A,A,A)| -s1(A)| -k1(A).
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 224 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p3(A,A,A)| -n2(A)| -q2(B,C,A)| -s1(B).
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 224 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p3(A,A,A)| -k1(A)| -n2(A).
% 0.12/0.37  13 back subsumes 9.
% 0.12/0.37  14 back subsumes 6.
% 0.12/0.37  28 back subsumes 21.
% 0.12/0.37  28 back subsumes 17.
% 0.12/0.37  40 back subsumes 39.
% 0.12/0.37  52 back subsumes 51.
% 0.12/0.37  77 back subsumes 68.
% 0.12/0.37  77 back subsumes 65.
% 0.12/0.37  142 back subsumes 134.
% 0.12/0.37  194 back subsumes 180.
% 0.12/0.37  216 back subsumes 213.
% 0.12/0.37  216 back subsumes 212.
% 0.12/0.37  244 back subsumes 239.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 321 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p0(b,c).
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 324 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q0(d,d).
% 0.12/0.37  321 back subsumes 317.
% 0.12/0.37  324 back subsumes 309.
% 0.12/0.37  326 back subsumes 315.
% 0.12/0.37  326 back subsumes 311.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.70/0.89  
% 0.70/0.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.70/0.89  
% 0.70/0.89  
% 0.70/0.89  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.70/0.89  
% 0.70/0.89  
% 0.70/0.89  
% 0.70/0.89  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.70/0.89  
% 0.70/0.89  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.70/0.89  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.70/0.89  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.70/0.89  number of clauses in intial UL: 294
% 0.70/0.89  number of clauses initially in problem: 326
% 0.70/0.89  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 90
% 0.70/0.89  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.70/0.89  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.70/0.89  absolute distinct symbol count: 53
% 0.70/0.89     distinct predicate count: 48
% 0.70/0.89     distinct function count: 0
% 0.70/0.89     distinct constant count: 5
% 0.70/0.89  
% 0.70/0.89  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.70/0.89  
% 0.70/0.89  
% 0.70/0.89  
% 0.70/0.89  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.70/0.90  
% 0.70/0.90  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.70/0.90  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.70/0.90  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.70/0.90  
% 0.70/0.90  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.52 sec ----> 469 [binary,468.1,307.1] {+} $F.
% 0.70/0.90  
% 0.70/0.90  Length of proof is 5.  Level of proof is 4.
% 0.70/0.90  
% 0.70/0.90  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.70/0.90  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.70/0.90  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.70/0.90  
% 0.70/0.90  1 [] {+} k1(A)| -n0(B,A).
% 0.70/0.90  109 [] {+} s1(A)| -p0(A,A).
% 0.70/0.90  110 [] {+} s1(A)| -q0(A,B)| -s1(C).
% 0.70/0.90  116 [] {+} l2(A,A)| -p0(B,B)| -s1(C)| -m0(D,C,A).
% 0.70/0.90  165 [] {+} q2(A,c,B)| -k1(B)| -l0(c)| -l2(B,A).
% 0.70/0.90  307 [] {+} -q2(e,c,A).
% 0.70/0.90  310 [] {-} n0(d,e).
% 0.70/0.90  321 [] {-} p0(b,A).
% 0.70/0.90  324 [] {-} q0(A,d).
% 0.70/0.90  326 [] {-} m0(A,d,B).
% 0.70/0.90  330 [] {-} l0(c).
% 0.70/0.90  361 [hyper,310,1] {-} k1(e).
% 0.70/0.90  380 [hyper,321,109] {-} s1(b).
% 0.70/0.90  398 [hyper,324,110,380] {-} s1(A).
% 0.70/0.90  407 [hyper,326,116,321,398] {-} l2(A,A).
% 0.70/0.90  468 [hyper,407,165,361,330] {-} q2(e,c,e).
% 0.70/0.90  469 [binary,468.1,307.1] {+} $F.
% 0.70/0.90  
% 0.70/0.90  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.70/0.90  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.70/0.90  
% 0.70/0.90  
% 0.70/0.90  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.70/0.90  
% 0.70/0.90  
% 0.70/0.90  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.70/0.90  
% 0.70/0.90  ============ end of search ============
% 0.70/0.90  
% 0.70/0.90  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.70/0.90  
% 0.70/0.90  Process 13503 finished Tue Jul 12 04:07:20 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------