%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.7
% Problem : SYN177-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:47:15 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 8.37s 1.37s
% Output : Proof 8.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN177-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.17 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.17 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.17 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.17 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.17 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.17 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.17 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.17 % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 15:39:42 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.18 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.18 Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.37/1.37 Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 9 --flip-ordering --complete-subsets --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10
% 8.37/1.37
% 8.37/1.37 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 8.37/1.37
% 8.37/1.37 % SZS output start Proof
% 8.37/1.37 Axiom 1 (axiom_9): r0(b) = true.
% 8.37/1.37 Axiom 2 (axiom_18): p0(c, b) = true.
% 8.37/1.37 Axiom 3 (axiom_30): n0(e, e) = true.
% 8.37/1.37 Axiom 4 (axiom_27): m0(e, b, c) = true.
% 8.37/1.37 Axiom 5 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 8.37/1.37 Axiom 6 (rule_186): ifeq(l1(X, Y), true, q2(Y, Y, X), true) = true.
% 8.37/1.38 Axiom 7 (rule_255): ifeq(q2(X, Y, Z), true, ifeq(n0(X, Y), true, q3(Y, Z), true), true) = true.
% 8.37/1.38 Axiom 8 (rule_003): ifeq(p0(X, Y), true, ifeq(r0(Z), true, ifeq(m0(W, Y, X), true, l1(Y, W), true), true), true) = true.
% 8.37/1.38
% 8.37/1.38 Goal 1 (prove_this): q3(X, b) = true.
% 8.37/1.38 The goal is true when:
% 8.37/1.38 X = e
% 8.37/1.38
% 8.37/1.38 Proof:
% 8.37/1.38 q3(e, b)
% 8.37/1.38 = { by axiom 5 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 8.37/1.38 ifeq(true, true, q3(e, b), true)
% 8.37/1.38 = { by axiom 3 (axiom_30) R->L }
% 8.37/1.38 ifeq(n0(e, e), true, q3(e, b), true)
% 8.37/1.38 = { by axiom 5 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 8.37/1.38 ifeq(true, true, ifeq(n0(e, e), true, q3(e, b), true), true)
% 8.37/1.38 = { by axiom 6 (rule_186) R->L }
% 8.37/1.38 ifeq(ifeq(l1(b, e), true, q2(e, e, b), true), true, ifeq(n0(e, e), true, q3(e, b), true), true)
% 8.37/1.38 = { by axiom 5 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 8.37/1.38 ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, l1(b, e), true), true, q2(e, e, b), true), true, ifeq(n0(e, e), true, q3(e, b), true), true)
% 8.37/1.38 = { by axiom 1 (axiom_9) R->L }
% 8.37/1.38 ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(r0(b), true, l1(b, e), true), true, q2(e, e, b), true), true, ifeq(n0(e, e), true, q3(e, b), true), true)
% 8.37/1.38 = { by axiom 5 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 8.37/1.38 ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(r0(b), true, ifeq(true, true, l1(b, e), true), true), true, q2(e, e, b), true), true, ifeq(n0(e, e), true, q3(e, b), true), true)
% 8.37/1.38 = { by axiom 5 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 8.37/1.38 ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, ifeq(r0(b), true, ifeq(true, true, l1(b, e), true), true), true), true, q2(e, e, b), true), true, ifeq(n0(e, e), true, q3(e, b), true), true)
% 8.37/1.38 = { by axiom 2 (axiom_18) R->L }
% 8.37/1.38 ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(p0(c, b), true, ifeq(r0(b), true, ifeq(true, true, l1(b, e), true), true), true), true, q2(e, e, b), true), true, ifeq(n0(e, e), true, q3(e, b), true), true)
% 8.37/1.38 = { by axiom 4 (axiom_27) R->L }
% 8.37/1.38 ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(p0(c, b), true, ifeq(r0(b), true, ifeq(m0(e, b, c), true, l1(b, e), true), true), true), true, q2(e, e, b), true), true, ifeq(n0(e, e), true, q3(e, b), true), true)
% 8.37/1.38 = { by axiom 8 (rule_003) }
% 8.37/1.38 ifeq(ifeq(true, true, q2(e, e, b), true), true, ifeq(n0(e, e), true, q3(e, b), true), true)
% 8.37/1.38 = { by axiom 5 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 8.37/1.38 ifeq(q2(e, e, b), true, ifeq(n0(e, e), true, q3(e, b), true), true)
% 8.37/1.38 = { by axiom 7 (rule_255) }
% 8.37/1.38 true
% 8.37/1.38 % SZS output end Proof
% 8.37/1.38
% 8.37/1.38 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------