↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SYN181-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:32:43 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   21
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   77 (  31 unt;   0 nHn;  53 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  162 (   0 equ;  88 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   17 (  16 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  131 (  56 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_085,axiom,
    ( ~ p0(X2,X1)
    | p1(X1,X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_085) ).

cnf(rule_082,axiom,
    ( ~ p1(X3,X1,X4)
    | ~ m0(X3,X1,X4)
    | p1(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_082) ).

cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
    p0(b,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_14) ).

cnf(axiom_12,axiom,
    m0(a,X1,a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_12) ).

cnf(rule_001,axiom,
    ( ~ n0(X2,X1)
    | k1(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_001) ).

cnf(rule_124,axiom,
    ( ~ q1(d,X2,d)
    | ~ s0(d)
    | ~ q0(X1,X2)
    | r1(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_124) ).

cnf(rule_117,axiom,
    ( ~ s0(d)
    | ~ k0(e)
    | q1(d,d,d) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_117) ).

cnf(rule_137,axiom,
    ( ~ p1(X2,X3,X1)
    | n2(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_137) ).

cnf(rule_201,axiom,
    ( ~ m2(X3)
    | ~ m2(X4)
    | ~ p1(X2,X3,X1)
    | k3(X1,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_201) ).

cnf(rule_136,axiom,
    ( ~ k1(b)
    | m2(b) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_136) ).

cnf(axiom_7,axiom,
    n0(d,b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_7) ).

cnf(axiom_1,axiom,
    s0(d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_1) ).

cnf(axiom_28,axiom,
    k0(e),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_28) ).

cnf(rule_236,axiom,
    ( ~ n2(X1)
    | m3(X1,X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_236) ).

cnf(rule_187,axiom,
    ( ~ q2(X2,X2,X2)
    | ~ k0(X2)
    | ~ m0(X3,X4,X1)
    | ~ r1(X2)
    | q2(X1,X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_187) ).

cnf(axiom_17,axiom,
    q0(X1,d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_17) ).

cnf(rule_181,axiom,
    ( ~ p1(X1,X1,X1)
    | q2(X1,X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_181) ).

cnf(rule_295,axiom,
    ( ~ m3(X4,X5,X4)
    | ~ q2(X4,X2,X1)
    | ~ k3(X3,X3,X1)
    | q4(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_295) ).

cnf(axiom_19,axiom,
    m0(X1,d,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_19) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ q4(d,b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(axiom_32,axiom,
    k0(b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_32) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ p0(X2,X1)
    | p1(X1,X1,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_085]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ p1(X3,X1,X4)
    | ~ m0(X3,X1,X4)
    | p1(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_082]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ p0(X2,X1)
    | p1(X1,X1,X1) ),
    c_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    p0(b,X1),
    axiom_14 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ p1(X3,X1,X4)
    | ~ m0(X3,X1,X4)
    | p1(X1,X2,X3) ),
    c_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    p1(X1,X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ m0(X1,X1,X1)
    | p1(X1,X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
    m0(a,X1,a),
    axiom_12 ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ n0(X2,X1)
    | k1(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_001]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ q1(d,X2,d)
    | ~ s0(d)
    | ~ q0(X1,X2)
    | r1(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_124]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ s0(d)
    | ~ k0(e)
    | q1(d,d,d) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_117]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ p1(X2,X3,X1)
    | n2(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_137]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ m2(X3)
    | ~ m2(X4)
    | ~ p1(X2,X3,X1)
    | k3(X1,X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_201]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    p1(a,X1,a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ k1(b)
    | m2(b) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_136]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ n0(X2,X1)
    | k1(X1) ),
    c_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_37,axiom,
    n0(d,b),
    axiom_7 ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ q1(d,X2,d)
    | ~ s0(d)
    | ~ q0(X1,X2)
    | r1(X1) ),
    c_0_30 ).

cnf(c_0_39,axiom,
    s0(d),
    axiom_1 ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( ~ s0(d)
    | ~ k0(e)
    | q1(d,d,d) ),
    c_0_31 ).

cnf(c_0_41,axiom,
    k0(e),
    axiom_28 ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ( ~ n2(X1)
    | m3(X1,X1,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_236]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( ~ p1(X2,X3,X1)
    | n2(X1) ),
    c_0_32 ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( ~ m2(X3)
    | ~ m2(X4)
    | ~ p1(X2,X3,X1)
    | k3(X1,X1,X2) ),
    c_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    p1(X1,X2,a),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_34]),c_0_28])]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    ( ~ k1(b)
    | m2(b) ),
    c_0_35 ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    k1(b),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    ( ~ q2(X2,X2,X2)
    | ~ k0(X2)
    | ~ m0(X3,X4,X1)
    | ~ r1(X2)
    | q2(X1,X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_187]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    ( ~ q0(X1,X2)
    | ~ q1(d,X2,d)
    | r1(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39])]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,axiom,
    q0(X1,d),
    axiom_17 ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    q1(d,d,d),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_39]),c_0_41])]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    ( ~ p1(X1,X1,X1)
    | q2(X1,X1,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_181]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    ( ~ m3(X4,X5,X4)
    | ~ q2(X4,X2,X1)
    | ~ k3(X3,X3,X1)
    | q4(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_295]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    ( ~ n2(X1)
    | m3(X1,X1,X1) ),
    c_0_42 ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    n2(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    ( ~ m2(X3)
    | ~ m2(X2)
    | k3(a,a,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    m2(b),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47])]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    ( ~ q2(X2,X2,X2)
    | ~ k0(X2)
    | ~ m0(X3,X4,X1)
    | ~ r1(X2)
    | q2(X1,X2,X1) ),
    c_0_48 ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    r1(X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]),c_0_51])]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,plain,
    ( ~ p1(X1,X1,X1)
    | q2(X1,X1,X1) ),
    c_0_52 ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    ( ~ m3(X4,X5,X4)
    | ~ q2(X4,X2,X1)
    | ~ k3(X3,X3,X1)
    | q4(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_53 ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    m3(X1,X1,X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55])]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    ( ~ m2(X2)
    | k3(a,a,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_57]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    ( ~ m0(X3,X4,X1)
    | ~ k0(X2)
    | ~ q2(X2,X2,X2)
    | q2(X1,X2,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59])]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,plain,
    q2(X1,X1,X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,plain,
    ( ~ q2(X4,X2,X1)
    | ~ k3(X3,X3,X1)
    | q4(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_62]) ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    k3(a,a,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_57]) ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    ( ~ m0(X3,X4,X1)
    | ~ k0(X2)
    | q2(X1,X2,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65])]) ).

cnf(c_0_69,axiom,
    m0(X1,d,X2),
    axiom_19 ).

cnf(c_0_70,negated_conjecture,
    ~ q4(d,b),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).

cnf(c_0_71,plain,
    ( ~ q2(X3,X2,X1)
    | q4(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_67]) ).

cnf(c_0_72,plain,
    ( ~ k0(X2)
    | q2(X1,X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_69]) ).

cnf(c_0_73,negated_conjecture,
    ~ q4(d,b),
    c_0_70 ).

cnf(c_0_74,plain,
    ( ~ k0(X2)
    | q4(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_72]) ).

cnf(c_0_75,axiom,
    k0(b),
    axiom_32 ).

cnf(c_0_76,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_74]),c_0_75])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN181-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:45:34 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.51  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.18/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.51  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.51  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.51  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.51  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.51  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 3870811 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.51  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.18/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.51  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.51  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.18/0.51  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.51  % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.51  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.51  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.51  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.51  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.51  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.51  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.51  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 3870818 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.51  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.18/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.51  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.51  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.18/0.51  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.51  % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.51  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.51  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.51  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.51  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.51  % Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.51  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  % Proof found!
% 0.18/0.51  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.51  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.51  % Parsed axioms                        : 369
% 0.18/0.51  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.18/0.51  % Initial clauses                      : 369
% 0.18/0.51  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 7
% 0.18/0.51  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 362
% 0.18/0.51  % Processed clauses                    : 1468
% 0.18/0.51  % ...of these trivial                  : 65
% 0.18/0.51  % ...subsumed                          : 94
% 0.18/0.51  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1309
% 0.18/0.51  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.18/0.51  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.18/0.51  % Backward-subsumed                    : 100
% 0.18/0.51  % Backward-rewritten                   : 348
% 0.18/0.51  % Generated clauses                    : 2086
% 0.18/0.51  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1536
% 0.18/0.51  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.18/0.51  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.18/0.51  % Paramodulations                      : 2086
% 0.18/0.51  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.18/0.51  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.18/0.51  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.18/0.51  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.18/0.51  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1466
% 0.18/0.51  % ...of those cached                   : 1037
% 0.18/0.51  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.18/0.51  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.18/0.51  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.51  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.18/0.51  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.51  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.18/0.51  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.18/0.51  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.18/0.51  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.18/0.51  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.18/0.51  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.18/0.51  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.18/0.51  % Current number of processed clauses  : 533
% 0.18/0.51  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 249
% 0.18/0.51  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.51  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.18/0.51  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 283
% 0.18/0.51  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 359
% 0.18/0.51  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1127
% 0.18/0.51  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.18/0.51  % Current number of archived clauses   : 776
% 0.18/0.51  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 62728
% 0.18/0.51  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 46690
% 0.18/0.51  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 184
% 0.18/0.51  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6007
% 0.18/0.51  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.18/0.51  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 771
% 0.18/0.51  % BW rewrite match successes           : 227
% 0.18/0.51  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.18/0.51  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.18/0.51  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 37429
% 0.18/0.51  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1461
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.51  % User time                : 0.071 s
% 0.18/0.51  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.18/0.51  % Total time               : 0.076 s
% 0.18/0.51  % Maximum resident set size: 4216 pages
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.51  % User time                : 0.304 s
% 0.18/0.51  % System time              : 0.028 s
% 0.18/0.51  % Total time               : 0.332 s
% 0.18/0.51  % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.18/0.51  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------