↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYN189-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:16:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 209.30s 117.18s
% Output   : Refutation 209.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  14 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   86 (   6 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  192 (  42   ~;  39   |;   0   &; 111   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   0   ^;  33   !;   0   ?;  33   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(r2_decl,type,
    r2: $i > $o ).

thf(c_decl,type,
    c: $i ).

thf(d_decl,type,
    d: $i ).

thf(q0_decl,type,
    q0: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(q1_decl,type,
    q1: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(l0_decl,type,
    l0: $i > $o ).

thf(s0_decl,type,
    s0: $i > $o ).

thf(r1_decl,type,
    r1: $i > $o ).

thf(311,axiom,
    c @ l0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_24) ).

thf(959,plain,
    c @ l0,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[311]) ).

thf(325,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ l0 )
      | ~ ( A @ r1 )
      | ( A @ r2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_188) ).

thf(986,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ l0 )
      | ~ ( A @ r1 )
      | ( A @ r2 ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[325]) ).

thf(987,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ l0 )
      | ~ ( A @ r1 )
      | ( A @ r2 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[986]) ).

thf(239,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( d @ ( A @ q0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_17) ).

thf(819,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( d @ ( A @ q0 ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[239]) ).

thf(31,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( d @ ( B @ ( d @ q1 ) ) )
      | ~ ( d @ s0 )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ q0 ) )
      | ( A @ r1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_124) ).

thf(428,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( d @ ( B @ ( d @ q1 ) ) )
      | ~ ( d @ s0 )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ q0 ) )
      | ( A @ r1 ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[31]) ).

thf(429,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( d @ ( B @ ( d @ q1 ) ) )
      | ~ ( d @ s0 )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ q0 ) )
      | ( A @ r1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[428]) ).

thf(217,axiom,
    d @ s0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1) ).

thf(778,plain,
    d @ s0,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[217]) ).

thf(3136,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( d @ ( B @ ( d @ q1 ) ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ q0 ) )
      | ( A @ r1 ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[429,778]) ).

thf(3137,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( d @ ( B @ ( d @ q1 ) ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ q0 ) )
      | ( A @ r1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[3136]) ).

thf(3144,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( d @ ( A @ q0 ) )
       != ( C @ ( B @ q0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( d @ ( C @ ( d @ q1 ) ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( B @ r1 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[819,3137]) ).

thf(3145,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( d @ ( A @ q0 ) )
       != ( C @ ( B @ q0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( d @ ( C @ ( d @ q1 ) ) )
      | ( B @ r1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[3144]) ).

thf(3146,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( d @ ( d @ ( d @ q1 ) ) )
      | ( A @ r1 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[3145:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( A )),bind(C,$thf( d ))]]) ).

thf(28,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ s0 )
      | ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ q1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_097) ).

thf(422,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ s0 )
      | ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ q1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[28]) ).

thf(423,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ s0 )
      | ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ q1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[422]) ).

thf(2582,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( d @ s0 )
       != ( A @ s0 ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ q1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[778,423]) ).

thf(2583,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( d @ s0 )
       != ( A @ s0 ) )
      | ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ q1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[2582]) ).

thf(2584,plain,
    d @ ( d @ ( d @ q1 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[2583:[bind(A,$thf( d ))]]) ).

thf(7223,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ $true
      | ( A @ r1 ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[3146,2584]) ).

thf(7224,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ r1 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[7223]) ).

thf(74949,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ l0 )
      | ~ $true
      | ( A @ r2 ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[987,7224]) ).

thf(74950,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ l0 )
      | ( A @ r2 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[74949]) ).

thf(74951,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( c @ l0 )
       != ( A @ l0 ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( A @ r2 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[959,74950]) ).

thf(74952,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( c @ l0 )
       != ( A @ l0 ) )
      | ( A @ r2 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[74951]) ).

thf(74953,plain,
    c @ r2,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[74952:[bind(A,$thf( c ))]]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( c @ r2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

thf(370,plain,
    ~ ( c @ r2 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(371,plain,
    ~ ( c @ r2 ),
    inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[370]) ).

thf(74957,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[74953,371]) ).

thf(74958,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[74957]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN189-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/0.40  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.40  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 17:14:48 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.41  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.85/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.80/1.32  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (315ms). 
% 1.80/1.34  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.68/1.74  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.68/1.74  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.87/1.89  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 368 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 3.55/2.05  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 368 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 4.17/2.25  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 4.17/2.27  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 4.17/2.27  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 209.30/117.17  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 209.30/117.18  % Time passed: 116623ms (effective reasoning time: 115827ms)
% 209.30/117.18  % Axioms used in derivation (6): rule_124, rule_097, axiom_1, axiom_17, axiom_24, rule_188
% 209.30/117.18  % No. of inferences in proof: 35
% 209.30/117.18  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 116623 ms resp. 115827 ms w/o parsing
% 209.30/117.19  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 209.30/117.19  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------