%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SYN191-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:39:24 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.19s 6.25s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 57 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 62 ( 32 ~; 30 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 0 sgn 25 !; 0 ?; 14 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f9,axiom,
r0(b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_9) ).
fof(f18,axiom,
p0(c,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_18) ).
fof(f24,axiom,
l0(c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_24) ).
fof(f73,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ l0(X1)
| ~ r0(X0)
| m1(X0,X1,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_035) ).
fof(f95,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ~ r0(X0)
| n1(X0,X0,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_057) ).
fof(f190,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ p2(X0,X1,X0)
| ~ p0(X0,X1)
| ~ n1(X2,X1,X2)
| p2(X0,X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_152) ).
fof(f214,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ m1(X1,X0,X1)
| p2(X0,X1,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_176) ).
fof(f305,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ p2(X0,X2,X1)
| r3(X0,X1,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_267) ).
fof(f369,negated_conjecture,
~ r3(c,b,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
tcf(c_418,negated_conjecture,
~ r3(c,b,c),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f369]) ).
tcf(c_429,plain,
p0(c,b),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).
tcf(c_436,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( r3(X0,X2,X0)
| ~ p2(X0,X1,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f305]) ).
tcf(c_455,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( p2(X2,X1,X1)
| ~ p0(X2,X1)
| ~ p2(X2,X1,X2)
| ~ n1(X0,X1,X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f190]) ).
tcf(c_460,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( n1(X0,X0,X0)
| ~ r0(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).
tcf(c_496,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( p2(X1,X0,X1)
| ~ m1(X0,X1,X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f214]) ).
tcf(c_543,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( m1(X0,X1,X0)
| ~ l0(X1)
| ~ r0(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f73]) ).
tcf(c_547,plain,
r0(b),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
tcf(c_662,plain,
l0(c),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).
tcf(c_776,plain,
( n1(b,b,b)
| ~ r0(b) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_460]) ).
tcf(c_1227,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( r3(c,b,c)
| ~ p2(c,X0,b) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_436]) ).
tcf(c_1228,plain,
( r3(c,b,c)
| ~ p2(c,b,b) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1227]) ).
tcf(c_1362,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( m1(X0,c,X0)
| ~ l0(c)
| ~ r0(X0) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_543]) ).
tcf(c_1363,plain,
( m1(b,c,b)
| ~ l0(c)
| ~ r0(b) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1362]) ).
tcf(c_1617,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( p2(c,b,b)
| ~ p0(c,b)
| ~ p2(c,b,c)
| ~ n1(X0,b,X0) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_455]) ).
tcf(c_1618,plain,
( p2(c,b,b)
| ~ p0(c,b)
| ~ p2(c,b,c)
| ~ n1(b,b,b) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1617]) ).
tcf(c_2016,plain,
( p2(c,b,c)
| ~ m1(b,c,b) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_496]) ).
tcf(c_2017,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_2016,c_1618,c_1363,c_1228,c_776,c_418,c_429,c_547,c_662]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN191-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/5.39 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/5.39 % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 00:22:07 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/5.39 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/5.43 Running EPR theorem proving
% 0.15/5.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s epr_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.44
% 0.15/5.44 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/5.44
% 0.15/5.44 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/5.45 % Proving...
% 2.19/6.25 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.19/6.25 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.19/6.25
% 2.19/6.25 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.19/6.25
% 2.19/6.25 % ------ iProver source info
% 2.19/6.25
% 2.19/6.25 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.19/6.25 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.19/6.25 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.19/6.25
% 2.19/6.25 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 2.19/6.25
% 2.19/6.25
% 2.19/6.25 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...% ------ preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 2.19/6.25 %
% 2.19/6.25
% 2.19/6.25 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 48 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e %
% 2.19/6.25
% 2.19/6.25 % ------ Preprocessing...% ------ preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 2.19/6.25 gs_s sp: 91 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 2.19/6.25 % ------ Proving...
% 2.19/6.25 % ------ Problem Properties
% 2.19/6.25
% 2.19/6.25 %
% 2.19/6.25 % clauses 348
% 2.19/6.25 % conjectures 1
% 2.19/6.25 % EPR 348
% 2.19/6.25 % Horn 303
% 2.19/6.25 % unary 51
% 2.19/6.25 % binary 142
% 2.19/6.25 % lits 857
% 2.19/6.25 % lits eq 0
% 2.19/6.25 % fd_pure 0
% 2.19/6.25 % fd_pseudo 0
% 2.19/6.25 % fd_cond 0
% 2.19/6.25 % fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 2.19/6.25 % AC symbols 0
% 2.19/6.25
% 2.19/6.25 % ------ Schedule EPR non Horn non eq is on
% 2.19/6.25
% 2.19/6.25 % ------ no equalities: superposition off
% 2.19/6.25
% 2.19/6.25 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false" Time Limit: 70.
% 2.19/6.25
% 2.19/6.25
% 2.19/6.25 % ------
% 2.19/6.25 % Current options:
% 2.19/6.25 % ------
% 2.19/6.25
% 2.19/6.25
% 2.19/6.25 %
% 2.19/6.25
% 2.19/6.25 % ------ Proving...
% 2.19/6.25 %
% 2.19/6.25
% 2.19/6.25 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.19/6.25
% 2.19/6.25 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.19/6.25
% 2.19/6.25
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------