%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : SYN195-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:16:58 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 197.56s 94.64s
% Output : Refutation 197.74s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 22
% Number of leaves : 16
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 87 ( 26 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 231 ( 24 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 569 ( 103 ~; 96 |; 0 &; 370 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 20 ( 17 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 137 ( 0 ^; 137 !; 0 ?; 137 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(r5_decl,type,
r5: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(d_decl,type,
d: $i ).
thf(m0_decl,type,
m0: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(n0_decl,type,
n0: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(q1_decl,type,
q1: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(c_decl,type,
c: $i ).
thf(p2_decl,type,
p2: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(k1_decl,type,
k1: $i > $o ).
thf(p1_decl,type,
p1: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(b_decl,type,
b: $i ).
thf(k0_decl,type,
k0: $i > $o ).
thf(s0_decl,type,
s0: $i > $o ).
thf(l1_decl,type,
l1: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(p3_decl,type,
p3: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(n2_decl,type,
n2: $i > $o ).
thf(n3_decl,type,
n3: $i > $o ).
thf(s4_decl,type,
s4: $i > $o ).
thf(321,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ n3 )
| ~ ( b @ k0 )
| ~ ( A @ s4 )
| ( B @ ( A @ r5 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_327) ).
thf(977,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ n3 )
| ~ ( b @ k0 )
| ~ ( A @ s4 )
| ( B @ ( A @ r5 ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[321]) ).
thf(978,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ n3 )
| ~ ( b @ k0 )
| ~ ( A @ s4 )
| ( B @ ( A @ r5 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[977]) ).
thf(340,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ ( d @ ( A @ m0 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_19) ).
thf(1010,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ ( d @ ( A @ m0 ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[340]) ).
thf(99,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ m0 ) ) )
| ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ q1 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_122) ).
thf(555,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ m0 ) ) )
| ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ q1 ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[99]) ).
thf(556,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ m0 ) ) )
| ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ q1 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[555]) ).
thf(28117,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( d @ ( A @ m0 ) ) )
!= ( C @ ( D @ ( C @ m0 ) ) ) )
| ~ $true
| ( C @ ( C @ ( C @ q1 ) ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[1010,556]) ).
thf(28118,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( d @ ( A @ m0 ) ) )
!= ( C @ ( D @ ( C @ m0 ) ) ) )
| ( C @ ( C @ ( C @ q1 ) ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[28117]) ).
thf(28119,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ q1 ) ) ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[28118:[bind(A,$thf( B )),bind(B,$thf( B )),bind(C,$thf( B )),bind(D,$thf( d ))]]) ).
thf(28143,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ q1 ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[28119]) ).
thf(145,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ q1 ) ) )
| ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ p2 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_154) ).
thf(645,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ q1 ) ) )
| ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ p2 ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[145]) ).
thf(646,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ q1 ) ) )
| ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ p2 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[645]) ).
thf(32361,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ q1 ) ) )
!= ( B @ ( B @ ( B @ q1 ) ) ) )
| ~ $true
| ( B @ ( B @ ( B @ p2 ) ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[28143,646]) ).
thf(32362,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ q1 ) ) )
!= ( B @ ( B @ ( B @ q1 ) ) ) )
| ( B @ ( B @ ( B @ p2 ) ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[32361]) ).
thf(32363,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ p2 ) ) ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[32362:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( A ))]]) ).
thf(143,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( C @ ( B @ p2 ) ) )
| ( A @ n3 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_240) ).
thf(641,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( C @ ( B @ p2 ) ) )
| ( A @ n3 ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[143]) ).
thf(642,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( C @ ( B @ p2 ) ) )
| ( A @ n3 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[641]) ).
thf(32401,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ p2 ) ) )
!= ( B @ ( D @ ( C @ p2 ) ) ) )
| ~ $true
| ( B @ n3 ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[32363,642]) ).
thf(32402,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ p2 ) ) )
!= ( B @ ( D @ ( C @ p2 ) ) ) )
| ( B @ n3 ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[32401]) ).
thf(32403,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( A @ n3 ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[32402:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( A )),bind(C,$thf( A )),bind(D,$thf( A ))]]) ).
thf(29,axiom,
b @ k0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_32) ).
thf(423,plain,
b @ k0,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[29]) ).
thf(58845,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ $true
| ~ $true
| ~ ( A @ s4 )
| ( B @ ( A @ r5 ) ) ),
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[978,32403,423]) ).
thf(58846,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ s4 )
| ( B @ ( A @ r5 ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[58845]) ).
thf(1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( d @ ( d @ r5 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
thf(368,plain,
~ ( d @ ( d @ r5 ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
thf(369,plain,
~ ( d @ ( d @ r5 ) ),
inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[368]) ).
thf(58862,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ r5 ) )
!= ( d @ ( d @ r5 ) ) )
| ~ $true
| ~ ( A @ s4 ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[58846,369]) ).
thf(58863,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ r5 ) )
!= ( d @ ( d @ r5 ) ) )
| ~ ( A @ s4 ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[58862]) ).
thf(58864,plain,
~ ( d @ s4 ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[58863:[bind(A,$thf( d )),bind(B,$thf( d ))]]) ).
thf(343,axiom,
d @ ( c @ n0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_34) ).
thf(1014,plain,
d @ ( c @ n0 ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[343]) ).
thf(53,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( B @ n0 ) )
| ( A @ ( A @ l1 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_002) ).
thf(467,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( B @ n0 ) )
| ( A @ ( A @ l1 ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[53]) ).
thf(468,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( B @ n0 ) )
| ( A @ ( A @ l1 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[467]) ).
thf(5437,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( d @ ( c @ n0 ) )
!= ( A @ ( B @ n0 ) ) )
| ~ $true
| ( A @ ( A @ l1 ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[1014,468]) ).
thf(5438,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( d @ ( c @ n0 ) )
!= ( A @ ( B @ n0 ) ) )
| ( A @ ( A @ l1 ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[5437]) ).
thf(5439,plain,
d @ ( d @ l1 ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[5438:[bind(A,$thf( d )),bind(B,$thf( c ))]]) ).
thf(146,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( B @ n0 ) )
| ( A @ k1 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_001) ).
thf(647,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( B @ n0 ) )
| ( A @ k1 ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[146]) ).
thf(648,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( B @ n0 ) )
| ( A @ k1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[647]) ).
thf(3271,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( d @ ( c @ n0 ) )
!= ( A @ ( B @ n0 ) ) )
| ~ $true
| ( A @ k1 ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[1014,648]) ).
thf(3272,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( d @ ( c @ n0 ) )
!= ( A @ ( B @ n0 ) ) )
| ( A @ k1 ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[3271]) ).
thf(3273,plain,
d @ k1,
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[3272:[bind(A,$thf( d )),bind(B,$thf( c ))]]) ).
thf(43,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ n2 )
| ~ ( A @ k1 )
| ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ p3 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_249) ).
thf(447,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ n2 )
| ~ ( A @ k1 )
| ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ p3 ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[43]) ).
thf(448,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ n2 )
| ~ ( A @ k1 )
| ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ p3 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[447]) ).
thf(5819,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( d @ k1 )
!= ( A @ k1 ) )
| ~ ( A @ n2 )
| ~ $true
| ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ p3 ) ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[3273,448]) ).
thf(5820,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( d @ k1 )
!= ( A @ k1 ) )
| ~ ( A @ n2 )
| ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ p3 ) ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[5819]) ).
thf(5821,plain,
( ~ ( d @ n2 )
| ( d @ ( d @ ( d @ p3 ) ) ) ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[5820:[bind(A,$thf( d ))]]) ).
thf(59,axiom,
b @ s0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_5) ).
thf(479,plain,
b @ s0,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[59]) ).
thf(338,axiom,
d @ s0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1) ).
thf(1007,plain,
d @ s0,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[338]) ).
thf(21,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ s0 )
| ~ ( B @ s0 )
| ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ p1 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_072) ).
thf(407,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ s0 )
| ~ ( B @ s0 )
| ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ p1 ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[21]) ).
thf(408,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ s0 )
| ~ ( B @ s0 )
| ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ p1 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[407]) ).
thf(2575,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( d @ s0 )
!= ( A @ s0 ) )
| ~ $true
| ~ ( B @ s0 )
| ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ p1 ) ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[1007,408]) ).
thf(2576,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( d @ s0 )
!= ( A @ s0 ) )
| ~ ( B @ s0 )
| ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ p1 ) ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[2575]) ).
thf(2577,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ s0 )
| ( d @ ( d @ ( d @ p1 ) ) ) ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[2576:[bind(A,$thf( d ))]]) ).
thf(2589,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ s0 )
| ( d @ ( d @ ( d @ p1 ) ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[2577]) ).
thf(2620,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( b @ s0 )
!= ( A @ s0 ) )
| ~ $true
| ( d @ ( d @ ( d @ p1 ) ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[479,2589]) ).
thf(2621,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( b @ s0 )
!= ( A @ s0 ) )
| ( d @ ( d @ ( d @ p1 ) ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[2620]) ).
thf(2622,plain,
d @ ( d @ ( d @ p1 ) ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[2621:[bind(A,$thf( b ))]]) ).
thf(115,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( C @ ( B @ p1 ) ) )
| ( A @ n2 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_137) ).
thf(587,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( C @ ( B @ p1 ) ) )
| ( A @ n2 ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[115]) ).
thf(588,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( C @ ( B @ p1 ) ) )
| ( A @ n2 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[587]) ).
thf(27874,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( d @ ( d @ ( d @ p1 ) ) )
!= ( A @ ( C @ ( B @ p1 ) ) ) )
| ~ $true
| ( A @ n2 ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[2622,588]) ).
thf(27875,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( d @ ( d @ ( d @ p1 ) ) )
!= ( A @ ( C @ ( B @ p1 ) ) ) )
| ( A @ n2 ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[27874]) ).
thf(27876,plain,
d @ n2,
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[27875:[bind(A,$thf( d )),bind(B,$thf( d )),bind(C,$thf( d ))]]) ).
thf(27930,plain,
( ~ $true
| ( d @ ( d @ ( d @ p3 ) ) ) ),
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[5821,27876]) ).
thf(27931,plain,
d @ ( d @ ( d @ p3 ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[27930]) ).
thf(109,axiom,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( C @ ( A @ l1 ) )
| ~ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ p3 ) ) )
| ( A @ s4 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_299) ).
thf(575,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( C @ ( A @ l1 ) )
| ~ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ p3 ) ) )
| ( A @ s4 ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[109]) ).
thf(576,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( C @ ( A @ l1 ) )
| ~ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ p3 ) ) )
| ( A @ s4 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[575]) ).
thf(28855,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( d @ ( d @ ( d @ p3 ) ) )
!= ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ p3 ) ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( A @ l1 ) )
| ~ $true
| ( A @ s4 ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[27931,576]) ).
thf(28856,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( d @ ( d @ ( d @ p3 ) ) )
!= ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ p3 ) ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( A @ l1 ) )
| ( A @ s4 ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[28855]) ).
thf(28857,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( d @ ( A @ l1 ) )
| ( A @ s4 ) ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[28856:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( d )),bind(C,$thf( d )),bind(D,$thf( d ))]]) ).
thf(29536,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( d @ ( d @ l1 ) )
!= ( d @ ( A @ l1 ) ) )
| ~ $true
| ( A @ s4 ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[5439,28857]) ).
thf(29537,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( d @ ( d @ l1 ) )
!= ( d @ ( A @ l1 ) ) )
| ( A @ s4 ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[29536]) ).
thf(29538,plain,
d @ s4,
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[29537:[bind(A,$thf( d ))]]) ).
thf(58870,plain,
~ $true,
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[58864,29538]) ).
thf(58871,plain,
$false,
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[58870]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SYN195-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.11 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.23/0.49 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.23/0.49 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.23/0.49 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.23/0.49 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.23/0.49 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.23/0.49 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.23/0.49 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.23/0.49 % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 17:20:29 UTC 2026
% 0.23/0.49 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.49 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.39/1.32 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 2.48/1.78 % [INFO] Parsing done (457ms).
% 2.94/1.80 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 4.22/2.37 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 4.22/2.38 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 4.70/2.57 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 368 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 5.34/2.75 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 366 axioms (removed 2 axioms).
% 6.25/2.95 % [INFO] Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF).
% 6.25/2.97 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 6.25/2.97 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 197.56/94.63 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 197.56/94.64 % Time passed: 93933ms (effective reasoning time: 92824ms)
% 197.56/94.64 % Axioms used in derivation (15): rule_327, axiom_19, rule_299, axiom_32, rule_249, rule_137, rule_240, axiom_1, axiom_5, axiom_34, rule_154, rule_072, rule_001, rule_122, rule_002
% 197.56/94.64 % No. of inferences in proof: 87
% 197.56/94.64 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 93933 ms resp. 92824 ms w/o parsing
% 197.74/94.71 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 197.74/94.71 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------