%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN196-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:23:21 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 5.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 25 ( 0 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 9 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_125,axiom,
( ~ p0(X1,X1)
| s1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_125) ).
cnf(rule_126,axiom,
( ~ s1(X3)
| ~ q0(X1,X2)
| s1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_126) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ s1(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_14) ).
cnf(axiom_36,axiom,
q0(a,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_36) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ p0(X1,X1)
| s1(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_125]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ s1(X3)
| ~ q0(X1,X2)
| s1(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_126]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ s1(a),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ p0(X1,X1)
| s1(X1) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
axiom_14 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ s1(X3)
| ~ q0(X1,X2)
| s1(X1) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
q0(a,b),
axiom_36 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ s1(a),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
s1(b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
~ s1(X1),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN196-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/5.39 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/5.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/5.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/5.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/5.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/5.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/5.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/5.39 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:48:42 UTC 2026
% 0.13/5.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/5.39 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/5.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/5.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/5.47 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.16/5.47 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.47 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.47 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.47 % new_bool_1 with pid 2073086 completed with status 0
% 0.16/5.47 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.16/5.47 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.47 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.47 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.16/5.47 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/5.47 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/5.47 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/5.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.47 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2073093 completed with status 0
% 0.16/5.47 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.16/5.47 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.47 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.47 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.16/5.47 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/5.47 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/5.47 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/5.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.47 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/5.47
% 0.16/5.47 % Proof found!
% 0.16/5.47 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/5.47 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/5.47 % Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.16/5.47 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 48
% 0.16/5.47 % Initial clauses : 321
% 0.16/5.47 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.16/5.47 % Initial clauses in saturation : 316
% 0.16/5.47 % Processed clauses : 89
% 0.16/5.47 % ...of these trivial : 8
% 0.16/5.47 % ...subsumed : 1
% 0.16/5.47 % ...remaining for further processing : 80
% 0.16/5.47 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/5.47 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/5.47 % Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.16/5.47 % Backward-rewritten : 10
% 0.16/5.47 % Generated clauses : 28
% 0.16/5.47 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 27
% 0.16/5.47 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/5.47 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/5.47 % Paramodulations : 27
% 0.16/5.47 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/5.47 % NegExts : 0
% 0.16/5.47 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/5.47 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.16/5.47 % Total rewrite steps : 29
% 0.16/5.47 % ...of those cached : 8
% 0.16/5.47 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/5.47 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/5.47 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/5.47 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/5.47 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/5.47 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/5.47 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.47 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.47 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.47 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.47 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.47 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.47 % Current number of processed clauses : 66
% 0.16/5.47 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 52
% 0.16/5.47 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/5.47 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.16/5.47 % Non-unit-clauses : 13
% 0.16/5.47 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 254
% 0.16/5.47 % ...number of literals in the above : 802
% 0.16/5.47 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/5.47 % Current number of archived clauses : 14
% 0.16/5.47 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 51
% 0.16/5.47 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 46
% 0.16/5.47 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.16/5.47 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21
% 0.16/5.47 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/5.47 % BW rewrite match attempts : 12
% 0.16/5.47 % BW rewrite match successes : 10
% 0.16/5.47 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/5.47 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/5.47 % Termbank termtop insertions : 11116
% 0.16/5.47 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1526
% 0.16/5.47
% 0.16/5.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/5.47 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.16/5.47 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.16/5.47 % Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.16/5.47 % Maximum resident set size: 4472 pages
% 0.16/5.47
% 0.16/5.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/5.47 % User time : 0.014 s
% 0.16/5.47 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.16/5.47 % Total time : 0.025 s
% 0.16/5.47 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.16/5.47 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------