%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.7
% Problem : SYN196-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:47:17 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 5.20s 0.96s
% Output : Proof 5.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN196-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.17 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.17 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.17 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.17 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.17 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.17 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.17 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.17 % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 15:39:04 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.17 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.17 Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.20/0.96 Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --complete-subsets --ground-joining-incomplete-limit 15 --flatten-regeneralise
% 5.20/0.96
% 5.20/0.96 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 5.20/0.96
% 5.20/0.96 % SZS output start Proof
% 5.20/0.96 Axiom 1 (axiom_14): p0(b, X) = true.
% 5.20/0.96 Axiom 2 (axiom_36): q0(a, b) = true.
% 5.20/0.96 Axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 5.20/0.96 Axiom 4 (rule_125): ifeq(p0(X, X), true, s1(X), true) = true.
% 5.20/0.96 Axiom 5 (rule_126): ifeq(s1(X), true, ifeq(q0(Y, Z), true, s1(Y), true), true) = true.
% 5.20/0.96
% 5.20/0.96 Goal 1 (prove_this): s1(a) = true.
% 5.20/0.96 Proof:
% 5.20/0.96 s1(a)
% 5.20/0.96 = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 5.20/0.96 ifeq(true, true, s1(a), true)
% 5.20/0.96 = { by axiom 4 (rule_125) R->L }
% 5.20/0.96 ifeq(ifeq(p0(b, b), true, s1(b), true), true, s1(a), true)
% 5.20/0.96 = { by axiom 1 (axiom_14) }
% 5.20/0.96 ifeq(ifeq(true, true, s1(b), true), true, s1(a), true)
% 5.20/0.96 = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 5.20/0.96 ifeq(s1(b), true, s1(a), true)
% 5.20/0.96 = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 5.20/0.96 ifeq(s1(b), true, ifeq(true, true, s1(a), true), true)
% 5.20/0.96 = { by axiom 2 (axiom_36) R->L }
% 5.20/0.96 ifeq(s1(b), true, ifeq(q0(a, b), true, s1(a), true), true)
% 5.20/0.96 = { by axiom 5 (rule_126) }
% 5.20/0.96 true
% 5.20/0.96 % SZS output end Proof
% 5.20/0.96
% 5.20/0.96 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------