%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.7
% Problem : SYN198-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:47:17 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.49s 0.67s
% Output : Proof 3.49s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SYN198-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.16 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.16 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.16 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.16 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.16 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.16 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.16 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.16 % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 15:41:46 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.16 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.16 Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.49/0.67 Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 3.49/0.67
% 3.49/0.67 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.49/0.67
% 3.49/0.67 % SZS output start Proof
% 3.49/0.67 Axiom 1 (axiom_17): q0(X, d) = true.
% 3.49/0.67 Axiom 2 (axiom_14): p0(b, X) = true.
% 3.49/0.67 Axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 3.49/0.67 Axiom 4 (rule_125): ifeq(p0(X, X), true, s1(X), true) = true.
% 3.49/0.67 Axiom 5 (rule_126): ifeq(s1(X), true, ifeq(q0(Y, Z), true, s1(Y), true), true) = true.
% 3.49/0.67
% 3.49/0.67 Goal 1 (prove_this): s1(c) = true.
% 3.49/0.67 Proof:
% 3.49/0.67 s1(c)
% 3.49/0.67 = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 3.49/0.67 ifeq(true, true, s1(c), true)
% 3.49/0.67 = { by axiom 4 (rule_125) R->L }
% 3.49/0.67 ifeq(ifeq(p0(b, b), true, s1(b), true), true, s1(c), true)
% 3.49/0.67 = { by axiom 2 (axiom_14) }
% 3.49/0.67 ifeq(ifeq(true, true, s1(b), true), true, s1(c), true)
% 3.49/0.67 = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 3.49/0.67 ifeq(s1(b), true, s1(c), true)
% 3.49/0.67 = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 3.49/0.67 ifeq(s1(b), true, ifeq(true, true, s1(c), true), true)
% 3.49/0.67 = { by axiom 1 (axiom_17) R->L }
% 3.49/0.67 ifeq(s1(b), true, ifeq(q0(c, d), true, s1(c), true), true)
% 3.49/0.67 = { by axiom 5 (rule_126) }
% 3.49/0.67 true
% 3.49/0.67 % SZS output end Proof
% 3.49/0.67
% 3.49/0.67 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------