↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYN200-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:16:59 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 193.94s 97.23s
% Output   : Refutation 193.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  14 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   86 (  10 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  161 (  36   ~;  32   |;   0   &;  93   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   47 (   0   ^;  47   !;   0   ?;  47   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(s1_decl,type,
    s1: $i > $o ).

thf(e_decl,type,
    e: $i ).

thf(d_decl,type,
    d: $i ).

thf(q0_decl,type,
    q0: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(p0_decl,type,
    p0: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(b_decl,type,
    b: $i ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( e @ s1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

thf(370,plain,
    ~ ( e @ s1 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(371,plain,
    ~ ( e @ s1 ),
    inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[370]) ).

thf(78,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( b @ p0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_14) ).

thf(515,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( b @ p0 ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[78]) ).

thf(290,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ ( A @ p0 ) )
      | ( A @ s1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_125) ).

thf(922,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ ( A @ p0 ) )
      | ( A @ s1 ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[290]) ).

thf(923,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ ( A @ p0 ) )
      | ( A @ s1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[922]) ).

thf(5697,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( b @ p0 ) )
       != ( B @ ( B @ p0 ) ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( B @ s1 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[515,923]) ).

thf(5698,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( b @ p0 ) )
       != ( B @ ( B @ p0 ) ) )
      | ( B @ s1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[5697]) ).

thf(5699,plain,
    b @ s1,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[5698:[bind(A,$thf( b )),bind(B,$thf( b ))]]) ).

thf(53,axiom,
    b @ ( d @ q0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_29) ).

thf(468,plain,
    b @ ( d @ q0 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[53]) ).

thf(348,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( C @ s1 )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ q0 ) )
      | ( A @ s1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_126) ).

thf(1028,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( C @ s1 )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ q0 ) )
      | ( A @ s1 ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[348]) ).

thf(1029,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( C @ s1 )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ q0 ) )
      | ( A @ s1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[1028]) ).

thf(47224,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( b @ ( d @ q0 ) )
       != ( B @ ( A @ q0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ s1 )
      | ~ $true
      | ( A @ s1 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[468,1029]) ).

thf(47225,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( b @ ( d @ q0 ) )
       != ( B @ ( A @ q0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ s1 )
      | ( A @ s1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[47224]) ).

thf(47226,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ s1 )
      | ( d @ s1 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[47225:[bind(A,$thf( d )),bind(B,$thf( b ))]]) ).

thf(47251,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ s1 )
      | ( d @ s1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[47226]) ).

thf(47554,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( b @ s1 )
       != ( A @ s1 ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( d @ s1 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[5699,47251]) ).

thf(47555,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( b @ s1 )
       != ( A @ s1 ) )
      | ( d @ s1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[47554]) ).

thf(47556,plain,
    d @ s1,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[47555:[bind(A,$thf( b ))]]) ).

thf(223,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( d @ ( A @ q0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_17) ).

thf(793,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( d @ ( A @ q0 ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[223]) ).

thf(47230,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( d @ ( A @ q0 ) )
       != ( C @ ( B @ q0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( D @ s1 )
      | ~ $true
      | ( B @ s1 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[793,1029]) ).

thf(47231,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( d @ ( A @ q0 ) )
       != ( C @ ( B @ q0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( D @ s1 )
      | ( B @ s1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[47230]) ).

thf(47232,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ s1 )
      | ( A @ s1 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[47231:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( A )),bind(C,$thf( d ))]]) ).

thf(47248,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ s1 )
      | ( A @ s1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[47232]) ).

thf(47874,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( d @ s1 )
       != ( B @ s1 ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( A @ s1 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[47556,47248]) ).

thf(47875,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( d @ s1 )
       != ( B @ s1 ) )
      | ( A @ s1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[47874]) ).

thf(47876,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ s1 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[47875:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( d ))]]) ).

thf(47994,plain,
    ~ $true,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[371,47876]) ).

thf(47995,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[47994]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SYN200-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.22/0.49  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.22/0.49  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.22/0.49  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.22/0.49  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.22/0.49  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.22/0.50  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.22/0.50  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.22/0.50  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 17:20:45 UTC 2026
% 0.22/0.50  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.50  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.24/1.29  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 2.53/1.74  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (445ms). 
% 2.53/1.76  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 4.10/2.33  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 4.10/2.34  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 4.55/2.54  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 368 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 5.10/2.78  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 368 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 6.25/3.05  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 6.25/3.08  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 6.25/3.08  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 193.94/97.22  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 193.94/97.22  % Time passed: 96525ms (effective reasoning time: 95456ms)
% 193.94/97.23  % Axioms used in derivation (5): rule_125, rule_126, axiom_17, axiom_29, axiom_14
% 193.94/97.23  % No. of inferences in proof: 34
% 193.94/97.23  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 96525 ms resp. 95456 ms w/o parsing
% 193.94/97.26  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 193.94/97.26  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------