%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SYN200-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:39:25 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.37s 11.25s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 35 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 35 ( 19 ~; 16 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 3 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 0 ?; 9 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
q0(e,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_2) ).
fof(f14,axiom,
! [X0] : p0(b,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_14) ).
fof(f163,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ~ p0(X0,X0)
| s1(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_125) ).
fof(f164,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ s1(X2)
| ~ q0(X0,X1)
| s1(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_126) ).
fof(f369,negated_conjecture,
~ s1(e),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
tcf(c_418,negated_conjecture,
~ s1(e),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f369]) ).
tcf(c_443,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( s1(X0)
| ~ s1(X2)
| ~ q0(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f164]) ).
tcf(c_444,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( s1(X0)
| ~ p0(X0,X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f163]) ).
tcf(c_619,plain,
q0(e,d),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
tcf(c_631,plain,
! [X0: $i] : p0(b,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).
tcf(c_750,plain,
p0(b,b),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_631]) ).
tcf(c_756,plain,
( s1(b)
| ~ p0(b,b) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_444]) ).
tcf(c_1024,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ iPr_def_10
| ~ s1(X0) ),
inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[c_443]) ).
tcf(c_1025,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ iPr_def_11
| s1(X0)
| ~ q0(X0,X1) ),
inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[c_443]) ).
tcf(c_1026,plain,
( iPr_def_11
| iPr_def_10 ),
inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[])],[c_443]) ).
tcf(c_1027,plain,
( ~ iPr_def_10
| ~ s1(b) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1024]) ).
tcf(c_1030,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( s1(e)
| ~ iPr_def_11
| ~ q0(e,X0) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1025]) ).
tcf(c_1032,plain,
( s1(e)
| ~ iPr_def_11
| ~ q0(e,d) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1030]) ).
tcf(c_1033,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_1032,c_1027,c_1026,c_756,c_619,c_750,c_418]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN200-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/10.39 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/10.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/10.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/10.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/10.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/10.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/10.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/10.39 % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 00:30:11 UTC 2026
% 0.10/10.40 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/10.40 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/10.43 Running EPR theorem proving
% 0.15/10.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s epr_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/10.44
% 0.15/10.44 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/10.44
% 0.15/10.45 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/10.46 % Proving...
% 2.37/11.25 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.37/11.25 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.37/11.25
% 2.37/11.25 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.37/11.25
% 2.37/11.25 % ------ iProver source info
% 2.37/11.25
% 2.37/11.25 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.37/11.25 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.37/11.25 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.37/11.25
% 2.37/11.25 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 2.37/11.25
% 2.37/11.25
% 2.37/11.25 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...% ------ preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 2.37/11.25 %
% 2.37/11.25
% 2.37/11.25 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 297 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e %
% 2.37/11.25
% 2.37/11.25 % ------ Preprocessing...% ------ preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 2.37/11.25 gs_s sp: 2 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 2.37/11.25 % ------ Proving...
% 2.37/11.25 % ------ Problem Properties
% 2.37/11.25
% 2.37/11.25 %
% 2.37/11.25 % clauses 17
% 2.37/11.25 % conjectures 1
% 2.37/11.25 % EPR 17
% 2.37/11.25 % Horn 16
% 2.37/11.25 % unary 13
% 2.37/11.25 % binary 3
% 2.37/11.25 % lits 22
% 2.37/11.25 % lits eq 0
% 2.37/11.25 % fd_pure 0
% 2.37/11.25 % fd_pseudo 0
% 2.37/11.25 % fd_cond 0
% 2.37/11.25 % fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 2.37/11.25 % AC symbols 0
% 2.37/11.25
% 2.37/11.25 % ------ Schedule EPR non Horn non eq is on
% 2.37/11.25
% 2.37/11.25 % ------ no equalities: superposition off
% 2.37/11.25
% 2.37/11.25 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false" Time Limit: 70.
% 2.37/11.25
% 2.37/11.25
% 2.37/11.25 % ------
% 2.37/11.25 % Current options:
% 2.37/11.25 % ------
% 2.37/11.25
% 2.37/11.25
% 2.37/11.25 %
% 2.37/11.25
% 2.37/11.25 % ------ Proving...
% 2.37/11.25 %
% 2.37/11.25
% 2.37/11.25 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.37/11.25
% 2.37/11.25 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.37/11.25
% 2.37/11.25
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------