↑ Up

Drodi-SAT---4.1.1.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Drodi-SAT---4.1.1
% Problem  : SYN201-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : drodi -satmode(on) -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:19:07 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.40s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN201-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : drodi -satmode(on) -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:45:55 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.38  % Drodi V4.1.1
% 0.12/0.40  % Refutation found
% 0.12/0.40  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark: Theory is unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.40  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.40  fof(f14,axiom,(
% 0.12/0.40    (![X]: (p0(b,X) ))),
% 0.12/0.40    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.12/0.40  fof(f15,axiom,(
% 0.12/0.40    n0(a,b) ),
% 0.12/0.40    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.12/0.40  fof(f40,axiom,(
% 0.12/0.40    (![G,H]: (( l1(G,G)| ~ n0(H,G) ) ))),
% 0.12/0.40    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.12/0.40  fof(f163,axiom,(
% 0.12/0.40    (![I]: (( s1(I)| ~ p0(I,I) ) ))),
% 0.12/0.40    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.12/0.40  fof(f224,axiom,(
% 0.12/0.40    (![G,H]: (( q2(G,G,H)| ~ l1(H,G) ) ))),
% 0.12/0.40    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.12/0.40  fof(f227,axiom,(
% 0.12/0.40    (![H]: (( s2(H)| ~ q2(b,H,b)| ~ s1(b) ) ))),
% 0.12/0.40    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.12/0.40  fof(f369,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.12/0.40    ~ s2(b) ),
% 0.12/0.40    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.12/0.40  fof(f383,plain,(
% 0.12/0.40    ![X0]: (p0(b,X0))),
% 0.12/0.40    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 0.12/0.40  fof(f384,plain,(
% 0.12/0.40    n0(a,b)),
% 0.12/0.40    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f15])).
% 0.12/0.40  fof(f410,plain,(
% 0.12/0.40    ![G]: (l1(G,G)|(![H]: ~n0(H,G)))),
% 0.12/0.40    inference(miniscoping,[status(thm)],[f40])).
% 0.12/0.40  fof(f411,plain,(
% 0.12/0.40    ![X0,X1]: (l1(X0,X0)|~n0(X1,X0))),
% 0.12/0.40    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f410])).
% 0.12/0.40  fof(f607,plain,(
% 0.12/0.40    ![X0]: (s1(X0)|~p0(X0,X0))),
% 0.12/0.40    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f163])).
% 0.12/0.40  fof(f699,plain,(
% 0.12/0.40    ![X0,X1]: (q2(X0,X0,X1)|~l1(X1,X0))),
% 0.12/0.40    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f224])).
% 0.12/0.40  fof(f703,plain,(
% 0.12/0.40    (![H]: (s2(H)|~q2(b,H,b)))|~s1(b)),
% 0.12/0.40    inference(miniscoping,[status(thm)],[f227])).
% 0.12/0.40  fof(f704,plain,(
% 0.12/0.40    ![X0]: (s2(X0)|~q2(b,X0,b)|~s1(b))),
% 0.12/0.40    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f703])).
% 0.12/0.40  fof(f924,plain,(
% 0.12/0.40    ~s2(b)),
% 0.12/0.40    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f369])).
% 0.12/0.40  fof(f936,plain,(
% 0.12/0.40    s1(b)),
% 0.12/0.40    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f607,f383])).
% 0.12/0.40  fof(f937,plain,(
% 0.12/0.40    ![X0]: (s2(X0)|~q2(b,X0,b))),
% 0.12/0.40    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f704,f936])).
% 0.12/0.40  fof(f992,plain,(
% 0.12/0.40    ~l1(b,b)|s2(b)),
% 0.12/0.40    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f699,f937])).
% 0.12/0.40  fof(f993,plain,(
% 0.12/0.40    ~l1(b,b)),
% 0.12/0.40    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f992,f924])).
% 0.12/0.40  fof(f995,plain,(
% 0.12/0.40    ![X0]: (~n0(X0,b))),
% 0.12/0.40    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f993,f411])).
% 0.12/0.40  fof(f998,plain,(
% 0.12/0.40    $false),
% 0.12/0.40    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f384,f995])).
% 0.12/0.40  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 1.38/1.64  % Elapsed time: 1.065376 seconds
% 1.38/1.64  % CPU time: 0.190765 seconds
% 1.38/1.64  % Total memory used: 68.303 MB
% 1.38/1.64  % Net memory used: 68.117 MB
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------