%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN203-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:23:22 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.79s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 32 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 27 RR)
% Number of literals : 58 ( 0 equ; 29 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 43 ( 17 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_125,axiom,
( ~ p0(X1,X1)
| s1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_125) ).
cnf(rule_002,axiom,
( ~ n0(X2,X1)
| l1(X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_002) ).
cnf(rule_189,axiom,
( ~ s1(b)
| ~ q2(b,X1,b)
| s2(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_189) ).
cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_14) ).
cnf(rule_186,axiom,
( ~ l1(X2,X1)
| q2(X1,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_186) ).
cnf(axiom_15,axiom,
n0(a,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_15) ).
cnf(rule_273,axiom,
( ~ m0(X3,X4,X2)
| ~ s2(X1)
| ~ q2(X3,X1,X3)
| s3(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_273) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ s3(X1,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(axiom_19,axiom,
m0(X1,d,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_19) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ p0(X1,X1)
| s1(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_125]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ n0(X2,X1)
| l1(X1,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_002]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ s1(b)
| ~ q2(b,X1,b)
| s2(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_189]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ p0(X1,X1)
| s1(X1) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
axiom_14 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ l1(X2,X1)
| q2(X1,X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_186]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ n0(X2,X1)
| l1(X1,X1) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
n0(a,b),
axiom_15 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ s1(b)
| ~ q2(b,X1,b)
| s2(X1) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
s1(b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ l1(X2,X1)
| q2(X1,X1,X2) ),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
l1(b,b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ m0(X3,X4,X2)
| ~ s2(X1)
| ~ q2(X3,X1,X3)
| s3(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_273]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ q2(b,X1,b)
| s2(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
q2(b,b,b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ m0(X3,X4,X2)
| ~ s2(X1)
| ~ q2(X3,X1,X3)
| s3(X1,X2) ),
c_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
s2(b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ s3(X1,b),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ m0(b,X2,X1)
| s3(b,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_23]),c_0_25])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
m0(X1,d,X2),
axiom_19 ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
~ s3(X1,b),
c_0_26 ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
s3(b,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN203-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.64 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.64 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.64 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.64 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.64 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.64 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.64 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:49:06 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.64 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.64 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.68 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.68 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.79 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.16/0.79 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.79 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.79 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.79 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.79 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.79 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.79 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 1278205 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.79 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.16/0.79 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.79 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.79 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.79 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/0.79 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.79 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.79 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.79 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.79 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.79 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.79 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.79 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.79 % new_bool_1 with pid 1278217 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.79 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.16/0.79 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.79 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.79 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.79 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/0.79 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.79 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.79 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.79 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.79 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.79 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.79 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.79 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.79 % Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.79 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.79
% 0.16/0.79 % Proof found!
% 0.16/0.79 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.79 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.79 % Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.16/0.79 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/0.79 % Initial clauses : 369
% 0.16/0.79 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 7
% 0.16/0.79 % Initial clauses in saturation : 362
% 0.16/0.79 % Processed clauses : 784
% 0.16/0.79 % ...of these trivial : 25
% 0.16/0.79 % ...subsumed : 25
% 0.16/0.79 % ...remaining for further processing : 734
% 0.16/0.79 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/0.79 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.79 % Backward-subsumed : 13
% 0.16/0.79 % Backward-rewritten : 50
% 0.16/0.79 % Generated clauses : 614
% 0.16/0.79 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 447
% 0.16/0.79 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.79 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.16/0.79 % Paramodulations : 614
% 0.16/0.79 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.79 % NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.79 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/0.79 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.16/0.79 % Total rewrite steps : 401
% 0.16/0.79 % ...of those cached : 261
% 0.16/0.79 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.79 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.79 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.79 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.79 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.79 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.79 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.79 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.79 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.79 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.79 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.79 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.79 % Current number of processed clauses : 343
% 0.16/0.79 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 132
% 0.16/0.79 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.79 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.16/0.79 % Non-unit-clauses : 210
% 0.16/0.79 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 338
% 0.16/0.79 % ...number of literals in the above : 823
% 0.16/0.79 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.79 % Current number of archived clauses : 391
% 0.16/0.79 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 36889
% 0.16/0.79 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 26564
% 0.16/0.79 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 36
% 0.16/0.79 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 573
% 0.16/0.79 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.79 % BW rewrite match attempts : 92
% 0.16/0.79 % BW rewrite match successes : 44
% 0.16/0.79 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.79 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.79 % Termbank termtop insertions : 20892
% 0.16/0.79 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1461
% 0.16/0.79
% 0.16/0.79 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.79 % User time : 0.060 s
% 0.16/0.79 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.79 % Total time : 0.065 s
% 0.16/0.79 % Maximum resident set size: 4472 pages
% 0.16/0.79
% 0.16/0.79 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.79 % User time : 0.306 s
% 0.16/0.79 % System time : 0.027 s
% 0.16/0.79 % Total time : 0.333 s
% 0.16/0.79 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.16/0.79 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------