↑ Up

Twee---2.7.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : SYN211-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:47:19 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 7.31s 1.18s
% Output   : Proof 7.31s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN211-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.18  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.18  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 15:38:06 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.18  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.31/1.18  Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 9 --flip-ordering --complete-subsets --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10
% 7.31/1.18  
% 7.31/1.18  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 7.31/1.18  
% 7.31/1.18  % SZS output start Proof
% 7.31/1.18  Axiom 1 (axiom_14): p0(b, X) = true.
% 7.31/1.18  Axiom 2 (axiom_34): n0(c, d) = true.
% 7.31/1.18  Axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 7.31/1.18  Axiom 4 (rule_244): ifeq(n2(X), true, p3(X, X, X), true) = true.
% 7.31/1.18  Axiom 5 (rule_002): ifeq(n0(X, Y), true, l1(Y, Y), true) = true.
% 7.31/1.18  Axiom 6 (rule_137): ifeq(p1(X, Y, Z), true, n2(Z), true) = true.
% 7.31/1.18  Axiom 7 (rule_085): ifeq(p0(X, Y), true, p1(Y, Y, Y), true) = true.
% 7.31/1.18  Axiom 8 (rule_299): ifeq(p3(X, Y, Z), true, ifeq(l1(W, Y), true, s4(W), true), true) = true.
% 7.31/1.18  
% 7.31/1.18  Goal 1 (prove_this): s4(d) = true.
% 7.31/1.18  Proof:
% 7.31/1.18    s4(d)
% 7.31/1.18  = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 7.31/1.18    ifeq(true, true, s4(d), true)
% 7.31/1.18  = { by axiom 4 (rule_244) R->L }
% 7.31/1.18    ifeq(ifeq(n2(d), true, p3(d, d, d), true), true, s4(d), true)
% 7.31/1.18  = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 7.31/1.18    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, n2(d), true), true, p3(d, d, d), true), true, s4(d), true)
% 7.31/1.18  = { by axiom 7 (rule_085) R->L }
% 7.31/1.18    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(p0(b, d), true, p1(d, d, d), true), true, n2(d), true), true, p3(d, d, d), true), true, s4(d), true)
% 7.31/1.18  = { by axiom 1 (axiom_14) }
% 7.31/1.18    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, p1(d, d, d), true), true, n2(d), true), true, p3(d, d, d), true), true, s4(d), true)
% 7.31/1.18  = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 7.31/1.18    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(p1(d, d, d), true, n2(d), true), true, p3(d, d, d), true), true, s4(d), true)
% 7.31/1.18  = { by axiom 6 (rule_137) }
% 7.31/1.18    ifeq(ifeq(true, true, p3(d, d, d), true), true, s4(d), true)
% 7.31/1.18  = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 7.31/1.18    ifeq(p3(d, d, d), true, s4(d), true)
% 7.31/1.18  = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 7.31/1.18    ifeq(p3(d, d, d), true, ifeq(true, true, s4(d), true), true)
% 7.31/1.18  = { by axiom 5 (rule_002) R->L }
% 7.31/1.18    ifeq(p3(d, d, d), true, ifeq(ifeq(n0(c, d), true, l1(d, d), true), true, s4(d), true), true)
% 7.31/1.18  = { by axiom 2 (axiom_34) }
% 7.31/1.18    ifeq(p3(d, d, d), true, ifeq(ifeq(true, true, l1(d, d), true), true, s4(d), true), true)
% 7.31/1.19  = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 7.31/1.19    ifeq(p3(d, d, d), true, ifeq(l1(d, d), true, s4(d), true), true)
% 7.31/1.19  = { by axiom 8 (rule_299) }
% 7.31/1.19    true
% 7.31/1.19  % SZS output end Proof
% 7.31/1.19  
% 7.31/1.19  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------