↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SYN218-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cJnVCfTfmk true

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 05:04:15 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.57s 0.89s
% Output   : Refutation 0.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SYN218-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cJnVCfTfmk true
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 13:40:23 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.12/0.34  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.12/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.12/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.56/0.64  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.56/0.64  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.56/0.64  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.56/0.70  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.56/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.57/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 0.57/0.89  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.57/0.89  % BCE start: 330
% 0.57/0.89  % BCE eliminated: 31
% 0.57/0.89  % PE start: 299
% 0.57/0.89  logic: neq
% 0.57/0.89  % PE eliminated: -97
% 0.57/0.89  % done 342 iterations in 0.153s
% 0.57/0.89  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.57/0.89  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.57/0.89  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(q0_type, type, q0: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(l2_type, type, l2: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(m0_type, type, m0: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(p0_type, type, p0: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(e_type, type, e: $i).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(s1_type, type, s1: $i > $o).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(axiom_35, axiom, (m0 @ d @ e @ c)).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl34, plain, ( (m0 @ d @ e @ c)),
% 0.57/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_35])).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(rule_133, axiom,
% 0.57/0.89    (( l2 @ J @ J ) | ( ~( p0 @ A @ A ) ) | ( ~( s1 @ B ) ) | 
% 0.57/0.89     ( ~( m0 @ C @ B @ J ) ))).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl170, plain,
% 0.57/0.89      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.89         ( (l2 @ X0 @ X0)
% 0.57/0.89          | ~ (p0 @ X1 @ X1)
% 0.57/0.89          | ~ (s1 @ X2)
% 0.57/0.89          | ~ (m0 @ X3 @ X2 @ X0))),
% 0.57/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_133])).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(axiom_14, axiom, (p0 @ b @ X)).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (p0 @ b @ X0)),
% 0.57/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_14])).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(rule_125, axiom, (( s1 @ I ) | ( ~( p0 @ I @ I ) ))).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl162, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ( (s1 @ X0) | ~ (p0 @ X0 @ X0))),
% 0.57/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_125])).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl556, plain, ( (s1 @ b)),
% 0.57/0.89      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl162])).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(axiom_17, axiom, (q0 @ X @ d)).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (q0 @ X0 @ d)),
% 0.57/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_17])).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(rule_126, axiom, (( s1 @ F ) | ( ~( q0 @ F @ G ) ) | ( ~( s1 @ H ) ))).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl163, plain,
% 0.57/0.89      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.89         ( (s1 @ X0) | ~ (q0 @ X0 @ X1) | ~ (s1 @ X2))),
% 0.57/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_126])).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl560, plain,
% 0.57/0.89      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: (~ (s1 @ X1) |  (s1 @ X0))),
% 0.57/0.89      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl16, zip_derived_cl163])).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl566, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (s1 @ X0)),
% 0.57/0.89      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl556, zip_derived_cl560])).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl1098, plain,
% 0.57/0.89      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.89         ( (l2 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (p0 @ X1 @ X1) | ~ (m0 @ X3 @ X2 @ X0))),
% 0.57/0.89      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl170, zip_derived_cl566])).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl1100, plain,
% 0.57/0.89      (![X0 : $i]: (~ (p0 @ X0 @ X0) |  (l2 @ c @ c))),
% 0.57/0.89      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl34, zip_derived_cl1098])).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(prove_this, conjecture, (l2 @ c @ X)).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( l2 @ c @ X )),
% 0.57/0.89    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_this])).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl329, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ~ (l2 @ c @ X0)),
% 0.57/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl1126, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ~ (p0 @ X0 @ X0)),
% 0.57/0.89      inference('clc', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1100, zip_derived_cl329])).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (p0 @ b @ X0)),
% 0.57/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_14])).
% 0.57/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl1127, plain, ($false),
% 0.57/0.89      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1126, zip_derived_cl13])).
% 0.57/0.89  
% 0.57/0.89  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.57/0.89  
% 0.57/0.89  
% 0.57/0.89  % Terminating...
% 0.61/0.94  % Runner terminated.
% 0.61/0.95  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------