%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SYN222-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eZrk0csBSu true
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 05:04:16 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.57s 0.82s
% Output : Refutation 0.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYN222-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eZrk0csBSu true
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 13:40:53 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.34 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.52/0.63 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.52/0.63 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.52/0.63 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.54/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.54/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.54/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.55/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.55/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.55/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.55/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.55/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 0.57/0.82 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.57/0.82 % BCE start: 369
% 0.57/0.82 % BCE eliminated: 40
% 0.57/0.82 % PE start: 329
% 0.57/0.82 logic: neq
% 0.57/0.82 % PE eliminated: -6
% 0.57/0.82 % done 194 iterations in 0.110s
% 0.57/0.82 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.57/0.82 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.57/0.82 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(p1_type, type, p1: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(k1_type, type, k1: $i > $o).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(m2_type, type, m2: $i > $o).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(l3_type, type, l3: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(n2_type, type, n2: $i > $o).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(n0_type, type, n0: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(rule_217, axiom, (( l3 @ C @ C ) | ( ~( n2 @ C ) ) | ( ~( m2 @ b ) ))).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl254, plain,
% 0.57/0.82 (![X0 : $i]: ( (l3 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (n2 @ X0) | ~ (m2 @ b))),
% 0.57/0.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_217])).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(rule_136, axiom, (( m2 @ b ) | ( ~( k1 @ b ) ))).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl173, plain, (( (m2 @ b) | ~ (k1 @ b))),
% 0.57/0.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_136])).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(axiom_7, axiom, (n0 @ d @ b)).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, ( (n0 @ d @ b)),
% 0.57/0.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_7])).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(rule_001, axiom, (( k1 @ I ) | ( ~( n0 @ J @ I ) ))).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl38, plain,
% 0.57/0.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (k1 @ X0) | ~ (n0 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.57/0.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_001])).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl704, plain, ( (k1 @ b)),
% 0.57/0.82 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl38])).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl711, plain, ( (m2 @ b)),
% 0.57/0.82 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl173, zip_derived_cl704])).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl826, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ( (l3 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (n2 @ X0))),
% 0.57/0.82 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl254, zip_derived_cl711])).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(prove_this, conjecture, (l3 @ X @ d)).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( l3 @ X @ d )),
% 0.57/0.82 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_this])).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl368, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ~ (l3 @ X0 @ d)),
% 0.57/0.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl827, plain, (~ (n2 @ d)),
% 0.57/0.82 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl826, zip_derived_cl368])).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(axiom_34, axiom, (n0 @ c @ d)).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl33, plain, ( (n0 @ c @ d)),
% 0.57/0.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_34])).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(rule_066, axiom, (( p1 @ G @ G @ G ) | ( ~( n0 @ H @ G ) ))).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl103, plain,
% 0.57/0.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (p1 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (n0 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.57/0.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_066])).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl890, plain, ( (p1 @ d @ d @ d)),
% 0.57/0.82 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl33, zip_derived_cl103])).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(rule_137, axiom, (( n2 @ A ) | ( ~( p1 @ B @ C @ A ) ))).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl174, plain,
% 0.57/0.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: ( (n2 @ X0) | ~ (p1 @ X1 @ X2 @ X0))),
% 0.57/0.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_137])).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl895, plain, ( (n2 @ d)),
% 0.57/0.82 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl890, zip_derived_cl174])).
% 0.57/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl896, plain, ($false),
% 0.57/0.82 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl827, zip_derived_cl895])).
% 0.57/0.82
% 0.57/0.82 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.57/0.82
% 0.57/0.82
% 0.57/0.82 % Terminating...
% 0.57/0.84 % Runner terminated.
% 0.57/0.85 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------