%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.7
% Problem : SYN237-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:47:22 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.94s 0.66s
% Output : Proof 2.94s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SYN237-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.03 % Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.18 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.18 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.18 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.18 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.18 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.18 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18 % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 15:41:09 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.18 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.19 Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.94/0.66 Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 9 --flip-ordering --complete-subsets --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10
% 2.94/0.66
% 2.94/0.66 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.94/0.66
% 2.94/0.66 % SZS output start Proof
% 2.94/0.66 Axiom 1 (axiom_13): r0(e) = true.
% 2.94/0.66 Axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 2.94/0.66 Axiom 3 (rule_012): ifeq(r0(e), true, m1(e, e, e), true) = true.
% 2.94/0.66
% 2.94/0.66 Goal 1 (prove_this): m1(X, X, e) = true.
% 2.94/0.66 The goal is true when:
% 2.94/0.66 X = e
% 2.94/0.66
% 2.94/0.66 Proof:
% 2.94/0.66 m1(e, e, e)
% 2.94/0.66 = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 2.94/0.66 ifeq(true, true, m1(e, e, e), true)
% 2.94/0.66 = { by axiom 1 (axiom_13) R->L }
% 2.94/0.66 ifeq(r0(e), true, m1(e, e, e), true)
% 2.94/0.66 = { by axiom 3 (rule_012) }
% 2.94/0.66 true
% 2.94/0.66 % SZS output end Proof
% 2.94/0.66
% 2.94/0.66 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------