%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.7
% Problem : SYN242-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:47:23 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.57s 0.73s
% Output : Proof 3.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN242-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.19 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.19 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.19 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.19 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.19 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.19 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.19 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.07/0.19 % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 15:39:07 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.19 % CPUTime :
% 0.07/0.19 Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.57/0.73 Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 9 --flip-ordering --complete-subsets --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10
% 3.57/0.73
% 3.57/0.73 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.57/0.73
% 3.57/0.73 % SZS output start Proof
% 3.57/0.73 Axiom 1 (axiom_1): s0(d) = true.
% 3.57/0.73 Axiom 2 (axiom_20): l0(a) = true.
% 3.57/0.73 Axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 3.57/0.73 Axiom 4 (rule_023): ifeq(l0(a), true, ifeq(s0(d), true, m1(a, a, a), true), true) = true.
% 3.57/0.73
% 3.57/0.73 Goal 1 (prove_this): m1(a, a, a) = true.
% 3.57/0.73 Proof:
% 3.57/0.73 m1(a, a, a)
% 3.57/0.73 = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 3.57/0.73 ifeq(true, true, m1(a, a, a), true)
% 3.57/0.73 = { by axiom 1 (axiom_1) R->L }
% 3.57/0.73 ifeq(s0(d), true, m1(a, a, a), true)
% 3.57/0.73 = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 3.57/0.73 ifeq(true, true, ifeq(s0(d), true, m1(a, a, a), true), true)
% 3.57/0.73 = { by axiom 2 (axiom_20) R->L }
% 3.57/0.73 ifeq(l0(a), true, ifeq(s0(d), true, m1(a, a, a), true), true)
% 3.57/0.73 = { by axiom 4 (rule_023) }
% 3.57/0.73 true
% 3.57/0.73 % SZS output end Proof
% 3.57/0.73
% 3.57/0.73 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------