↑ Up

Z3---4.15.1.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Z3---4.15.1
% Problem  : SYN246-1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Jun 21 05:38:35 AM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.42s
% Output   : Proof 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (   9 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  133 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  187 (  88   ~;  84   |;   0   &)
%                                         (  15 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :    8 (   8 fml;   0 var)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (  38   !;   0   ?;  42   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(m1_type,type,
    m1: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(c_type,type,
    c: $i ).

tff(b_type,type,
    b: $i ).

tff(k0_type,type,
    k0: $i > $o ).

tff(l0_type,type,
    l0: $i > $o ).

tff(1,plain,
    ( ~ m1(c,b,c)
  <=> ~ m1(c,b,c) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[]) ).

tff(2,axiom,
    ~ m1(c,b,c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

tff(3,plain,
    ~ m1(c,b,c),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[2,1]) ).

tff(4,plain,
    ^ [I: $i,J: $i] :
      refl(( ( m1(I,J,I)
          | ~ l0(I)
          | ~ k0(J) )
      <=> ( m1(I,J,I)
          | ~ l0(I)
          | ~ k0(J) ) )),
    inference(bind,[status(th)],[]) ).

tff(5,plain,
    ( ! [I: $i,J: $i] :
        ( m1(I,J,I)
        | ~ l0(I)
        | ~ k0(J) )
  <=> ! [I: $i,J: $i] :
        ( m1(I,J,I)
        | ~ l0(I)
        | ~ k0(J) ) ),
    inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

tff(6,plain,
    ( ! [I: $i,J: $i] :
        ( m1(I,J,I)
        | ~ l0(I)
        | ~ k0(J) )
  <=> ! [I: $i,J: $i] :
        ( m1(I,J,I)
        | ~ l0(I)
        | ~ k0(J) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[]) ).

tff(7,plain,
    ^ [I: $i,J: $i] :
      trans(monotonicity(rewrite(( ( m1(I,J,I)
              | ~ l0(I) )
          <=> ( m1(I,J,I)
              | ~ l0(I) ) )),
          ( ( m1(I,J,I)
            | ~ l0(I)
            | ~ k0(J) )
        <=> ( m1(I,J,I)
            | ~ l0(I)
            | ~ k0(J) ) )),
        rewrite(( ( m1(I,J,I)
            | ~ l0(I)
            | ~ k0(J) )
        <=> ( m1(I,J,I)
            | ~ l0(I)
            | ~ k0(J) ) )),
        ( ( m1(I,J,I)
          | ~ l0(I)
          | ~ k0(J) )
      <=> ( m1(I,J,I)
          | ~ l0(I)
          | ~ k0(J) ) )),
    inference(bind,[status(th)],[]) ).

tff(8,plain,
    ( ! [I: $i,J: $i] :
        ( m1(I,J,I)
        | ~ l0(I)
        | ~ k0(J) )
  <=> ! [I: $i,J: $i] :
        ( m1(I,J,I)
        | ~ l0(I)
        | ~ k0(J) ) ),
    inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

tff(9,axiom,
    ! [I: $i,J: $i] :
      ( m1(I,J,I)
      | ~ l0(I)
      | ~ k0(J) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_021) ).

tff(10,plain,
    ! [I: $i,J: $i] :
      ( m1(I,J,I)
      | ~ l0(I)
      | ~ k0(J) ),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[9,8]) ).

tff(11,plain,
    ! [I: $i,J: $i] :
      ( m1(I,J,I)
      | ~ l0(I)
      | ~ k0(J) ),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[10,6]) ).

tff(12,plain,
    ! [I: $i,J: $i] :
      ( m1(I,J,I)
      | ~ l0(I)
      | ~ k0(J) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[11]) ).

tff(13,plain,
    ! [I: $i,J: $i] :
      ( m1(I,J,I)
      | ~ l0(I)
      | ~ k0(J) ),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[12,5]) ).

tff(14,plain,
    ( k0(b)
  <=> k0(b) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[]) ).

tff(15,axiom,
    k0(b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_32) ).

tff(16,plain,
    k0(b),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[15,14]) ).

tff(17,plain,
    ( l0(c)
  <=> l0(c) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[]) ).

tff(18,axiom,
    l0(c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_24) ).

tff(19,plain,
    l0(c),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[18,17]) ).

tff(20,plain,
    ( ( ~ ! [I: $i,J: $i] :
            ( m1(I,J,I)
            | ~ l0(I)
            | ~ k0(J) )
      | ~ l0(c)
      | ~ k0(b)
      | m1(c,b,c) )
  <=> ( ~ ! [I: $i,J: $i] :
            ( m1(I,J,I)
            | ~ l0(I)
            | ~ k0(J) )
      | ~ l0(c)
      | ~ k0(b)
      | m1(c,b,c) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[]) ).

tff(21,plain,
    ( ( m1(c,b,c)
      | ~ l0(c)
      | ~ k0(b) )
  <=> ( ~ l0(c)
      | ~ k0(b)
      | m1(c,b,c) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[]) ).

tff(22,plain,
    ( ( ~ ! [I: $i,J: $i] :
            ( m1(I,J,I)
            | ~ l0(I)
            | ~ k0(J) )
      | m1(c,b,c)
      | ~ l0(c)
      | ~ k0(b) )
  <=> ( ~ ! [I: $i,J: $i] :
            ( m1(I,J,I)
            | ~ l0(I)
            | ~ k0(J) )
      | ~ l0(c)
      | ~ k0(b)
      | m1(c,b,c) ) ),
    inference(monotonicity,[status(thm)],[21]) ).

tff(23,plain,
    ( ( ~ ! [I: $i,J: $i] :
            ( m1(I,J,I)
            | ~ l0(I)
            | ~ k0(J) )
      | m1(c,b,c)
      | ~ l0(c)
      | ~ k0(b) )
  <=> ( ~ ! [I: $i,J: $i] :
            ( m1(I,J,I)
            | ~ l0(I)
            | ~ k0(J) )
      | ~ l0(c)
      | ~ k0(b)
      | m1(c,b,c) ) ),
    inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[22,20]) ).

tff(24,plain,
    ( ~ ! [I: $i,J: $i] :
          ( m1(I,J,I)
          | ~ l0(I)
          | ~ k0(J) )
    | m1(c,b,c)
    | ~ l0(c)
    | ~ k0(b) ),
    inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[]) ).

tff(25,plain,
    ( ~ ! [I: $i,J: $i] :
          ( m1(I,J,I)
          | ~ l0(I)
          | ~ k0(J) )
    | ~ l0(c)
    | ~ k0(b)
    | m1(c,b,c) ),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[24,23]) ).

tff(26,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[25,19,16,13,3]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem    : SYN246-1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 20 12:31:17 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.42  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.42  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.43  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------