%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.7
% Problem : SYN251-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:47:24 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 9.31s 1.46s
% Output : Proof 9.31s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN251-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.16 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.16 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.16 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.16 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.16 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.16 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.16 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.16 % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 15:40:05 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.17 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.17 Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.31/1.46 Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 9 --flip-ordering --complete-subsets --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10
% 9.31/1.46
% 9.31/1.46 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 9.31/1.46
% 9.31/1.46 % SZS output start Proof
% 9.31/1.46 Axiom 1 (axiom_24): l0(c) = true.
% 9.31/1.46 Axiom 2 (axiom_31): m0(b, b, e) = true.
% 9.31/1.46 Axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 9.31/1.46 Axiom 4 (rule_015): ifeq(l0(X), true, ifeq(m0(Y, Y, Z), true, m1(Z, Y, Y), true), true) = true.
% 9.31/1.46
% 9.31/1.46 Goal 1 (prove_this): m1(e, b, b) = true.
% 9.31/1.46 Proof:
% 9.31/1.46 m1(e, b, b)
% 9.31/1.46 = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 9.31/1.46 ifeq(true, true, m1(e, b, b), true)
% 9.31/1.46 = { by axiom 1 (axiom_24) R->L }
% 9.31/1.46 ifeq(l0(c), true, m1(e, b, b), true)
% 9.31/1.46 = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 9.31/1.46 ifeq(l0(c), true, ifeq(true, true, m1(e, b, b), true), true)
% 9.31/1.46 = { by axiom 2 (axiom_31) R->L }
% 9.31/1.46 ifeq(l0(c), true, ifeq(m0(b, b, e), true, m1(e, b, b), true), true)
% 9.31/1.46 = { by axiom 4 (rule_015) }
% 9.31/1.46 true
% 9.31/1.46 % SZS output end Proof
% 9.31/1.46
% 9.31/1.46 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------