%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN255-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:23:29 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_088,axiom,
( ~ l0(a)
| p1(a,a,a) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_088) ).
cnf(rule_137,axiom,
( ~ p1(X2,X3,X1)
| n2(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_137) ).
cnf(axiom_20,axiom,
l0(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_20) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ n2(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ l0(a)
| p1(a,a,a) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_088]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ p1(X2,X3,X1)
| n2(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_137]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ l0(a)
| p1(a,a,a) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
l0(a),
axiom_20 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ n2(a),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ p1(X2,X3,X1)
| n2(X1) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
p1(a,a,a),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ n2(a),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN255-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:45:21 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % new_bool_1 with pid 890246 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.14/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.44 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.44 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % SubtermCWHack with pid 890253 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.44 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.44 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.44
% 0.14/0.44 % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.44 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.44 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.14/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 41
% 0.14/0.45 % Initial clauses : 328
% 0.14/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.14/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 323
% 0.14/0.45 % Processed clauses : 125
% 0.14/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 9
% 0.14/0.45 % ...subsumed : 1
% 0.14/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 115
% 0.14/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.14/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 19
% 0.14/0.45 % Generated clauses : 58
% 0.14/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 55
% 0.14/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Paramodulations : 58
% 0.14/0.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 43
% 0.14/0.45 % ...of those cached : 13
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 94
% 0.14/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 66
% 0.14/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.14/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 27
% 0.14/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 245
% 0.14/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 789
% 0.14/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 21
% 0.14/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 216
% 0.14/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 191
% 0.14/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.14/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 25
% 0.14/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 20
% 0.14/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 18
% 0.14/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 11608
% 0.14/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1515
% 0.14/0.45
% 0.14/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.45 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.45 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.14/0.45 % Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.14/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4472 pages
% 0.14/0.45
% 0.14/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.45 % User time : 0.014 s
% 0.14/0.45 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.14/0.45 % Total time : 0.026 s
% 0.14/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.14/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------