%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.7
% Problem : SYN262-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:47:25 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 8.12s 1.35s
% Output : Proof 8.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN262-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.18 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.18 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.18 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.18 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.18 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.19 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19 % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 15:38:15 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.19 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.19 Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.12/1.35 Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 9 --flip-ordering --complete-subsets --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10
% 8.12/1.35
% 8.12/1.35 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 8.12/1.36
% 8.12/1.36 % SZS output start Proof
% 8.12/1.36 Axiom 1 (axiom_28): k0(e) = true.
% 8.12/1.36 Axiom 2 (axiom_7): n0(d, b) = true.
% 8.12/1.36 Axiom 3 (axiom_31): m0(b, b, e) = true.
% 8.12/1.36 Axiom 4 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 8.12/1.36 Axiom 5 (rule_063): ifeq(k0(X), true, ifeq(n0(d, Y), true, p1(Y, Y, X), true), true) = true.
% 8.12/1.36 Axiom 6 (rule_082): ifeq(p1(X, Y, Z), true, ifeq(m0(X, Y, Z), true, p1(Y, W, X), true), true) = true.
% 8.12/1.36
% 8.12/1.36 Goal 1 (prove_this): p1(b, c, b) = true.
% 8.12/1.36 Proof:
% 8.12/1.36 p1(b, c, b)
% 8.12/1.36 = { by axiom 4 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 8.12/1.36 ifeq(true, true, p1(b, c, b), true)
% 8.12/1.36 = { by axiom 3 (axiom_31) R->L }
% 8.12/1.36 ifeq(m0(b, b, e), true, p1(b, c, b), true)
% 8.12/1.36 = { by axiom 4 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 8.12/1.36 ifeq(true, true, ifeq(m0(b, b, e), true, p1(b, c, b), true), true)
% 8.12/1.36 = { by axiom 5 (rule_063) R->L }
% 8.12/1.36 ifeq(ifeq(k0(e), true, ifeq(n0(d, b), true, p1(b, b, e), true), true), true, ifeq(m0(b, b, e), true, p1(b, c, b), true), true)
% 8.12/1.36 = { by axiom 2 (axiom_7) }
% 8.12/1.36 ifeq(ifeq(k0(e), true, ifeq(true, true, p1(b, b, e), true), true), true, ifeq(m0(b, b, e), true, p1(b, c, b), true), true)
% 8.12/1.36 = { by axiom 4 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 8.12/1.36 ifeq(ifeq(k0(e), true, p1(b, b, e), true), true, ifeq(m0(b, b, e), true, p1(b, c, b), true), true)
% 8.12/1.36 = { by axiom 1 (axiom_28) }
% 8.12/1.36 ifeq(ifeq(true, true, p1(b, b, e), true), true, ifeq(m0(b, b, e), true, p1(b, c, b), true), true)
% 8.12/1.36 = { by axiom 4 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 8.12/1.36 ifeq(p1(b, b, e), true, ifeq(m0(b, b, e), true, p1(b, c, b), true), true)
% 8.12/1.36 = { by axiom 6 (rule_082) }
% 8.12/1.36 true
% 8.12/1.36 % SZS output end Proof
% 8.12/1.36
% 8.12/1.36 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------