%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN263-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:23:30 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 28 ( 0 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 14 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_085,axiom,
( ~ p0(X2,X1)
| p1(X1,X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_085) ).
cnf(rule_082,axiom,
( ~ p1(X3,X1,X4)
| ~ m0(X3,X1,X4)
| p1(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_082) ).
cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_14) ).
cnf(axiom_12,axiom,
m0(a,X1,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_12) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ p1(d,d,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ p0(X2,X1)
| p1(X1,X1,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_085]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ p1(X3,X1,X4)
| ~ m0(X3,X1,X4)
| p1(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_082]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ p0(X2,X1)
| p1(X1,X1,X1) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
axiom_14 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ p1(X3,X1,X4)
| ~ m0(X3,X1,X4)
| p1(X1,X2,X3) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
p1(X1,X1,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ m0(X1,X1,X1)
| p1(X1,X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
m0(a,X1,a),
axiom_12 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ p1(d,d,a),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
p1(a,X1,a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ p1(d,d,a),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
p1(X1,X2,a),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_14]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN263-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:47:04 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.47 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.47 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % new_bool_3 with pid 3875752 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/0.47 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.47 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.47 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.47 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3875755 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.47 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.47 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.47 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.47 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.47
% 0.14/0.47 % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.47 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.47 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.47 % Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.14/0.47 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 160
% 0.14/0.47 % Initial clauses : 209
% 0.14/0.47 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.14/0.47 % Initial clauses in saturation : 204
% 0.14/0.47 % Processed clauses : 493
% 0.14/0.47 % ...of these trivial : 57
% 0.14/0.47 % ...subsumed : 24
% 0.14/0.47 % ...remaining for further processing : 412
% 0.14/0.47 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Backward-subsumed : 40
% 0.14/0.47 % Backward-rewritten : 129
% 0.14/0.47 % Generated clauses : 581
% 0.14/0.47 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 371
% 0.14/0.47 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.14/0.47 % Paramodulations : 581
% 0.14/0.47 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Total rewrite steps : 499
% 0.14/0.47 % ...of those cached : 309
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.47 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.47 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.47 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.47 % Current number of processed clauses : 243
% 0.14/0.47 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 117
% 0.14/0.47 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Non-unit-clauses : 126
% 0.14/0.47 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 29
% 0.14/0.47 % ...number of literals in the above : 99
% 0.14/0.47 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Current number of archived clauses : 169
% 0.14/0.47 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5602
% 0.14/0.47 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4884
% 0.14/0.47 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 61
% 0.14/0.47 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 411
% 0.14/0.47 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % BW rewrite match attempts : 301
% 0.14/0.47 % BW rewrite match successes : 109
% 0.14/0.47 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Termbank termtop insertions : 14251
% 0.14/0.47 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1643
% 0.14/0.47
% 0.14/0.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.47 % User time : 0.023 s
% 0.14/0.47 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.14/0.47 % Total time : 0.032 s
% 0.14/0.47 % Maximum resident set size: 4216 pages
% 0.14/0.47
% 0.14/0.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.47 % User time : 0.026 s
% 0.14/0.47 % System time : 0.013 s
% 0.14/0.47 % Total time : 0.040 s
% 0.14/0.47 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.14/0.47 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------