%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SYN265-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:39:34 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.80s 1.15s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.80s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 47 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 45 ( 24 ~; 21 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 0 sgn 24 !; 0 ?; 14 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f9,axiom,
r0(b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_9) ).
fof(f12,axiom,
! [X0] : m0(a,X0,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_12) ).
fof(f20,axiom,
l0(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_20) ).
fof(f120,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ p1(X2,X0,X3)
| ~ m0(X2,X0,X3)
| p1(X0,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_082) ).
fof(f125,axiom,
( ~ p1(a,a,a)
| ~ r0(b)
| p1(a,b,a) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_087) ).
fof(f126,axiom,
( ~ l0(a)
| p1(a,a,a) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_088) ).
fof(f175,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ p1(X1,X2,X0)
| n2(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_137) ).
fof(f282,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ~ n2(X0)
| p3(X0,X0,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_244) ).
fof(f369,negated_conjecture,
! [X0] : ~ p3(X0,X0,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
tcf(c_426,plain,
r0(b),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
tcf(c_429,plain,
! [X0: $i] : m0(a,X0,a),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).
tcf(c_437,plain,
l0(a),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).
tcf(c_535,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( p1(X1,X3,X0)
| ~ p1(X0,X1,X2)
| ~ m0(X0,X1,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f120]) ).
tcf(c_540,plain,
( p1(a,b,a)
| ~ r0(b)
| ~ p1(a,a,a) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f125]) ).
tcf(c_541,plain,
( p1(a,a,a)
| ~ l0(a) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f126]) ).
tcf(c_589,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( n2(X2)
| ~ p1(X0,X1,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f175]) ).
tcf(c_694,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( p3(X0,X0,X0)
| ~ n2(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f282]) ).
tcf(c_768,negated_conjecture,
! [X0: $i] : ~ p3(X0,X0,a),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f369]) ).
tcf(c_772,plain,
m0(a,b,a),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_429]) ).
tcf(c_1244,plain,
( p3(a,a,a)
| ~ n2(a) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_694]) ).
tcf(c_1245,plain,
~ p3(a,a,a),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_768]) ).
tcf(c_1603,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( p1(X0,X1,a)
| ~ p1(a,X0,a)
| ~ m0(a,X0,a) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_535]) ).
tcf(c_1604,plain,
( p1(b,b,a)
| ~ p1(a,b,a)
| ~ m0(a,b,a) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1603]) ).
tcf(c_1657,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( n2(a)
| ~ p1(X0,X1,a) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_589]) ).
tcf(c_1658,plain,
( n2(a)
| ~ p1(b,b,a) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1657]) ).
tcf(c_1659,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_1658,c_1604,c_1245,c_1244,c_540,c_541,c_772,c_426,c_437]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN265-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.38 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38 % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 00:35:48 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.38 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.42 Running EPR theorem proving
% 0.10/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s epr_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.43
% 0.10/0.43 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.43
% 0.10/0.43 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.45 % Proving...
% 0.80/1.15 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.80/1.15 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.80/1.15
% 0.80/1.15 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.80/1.15
% 0.80/1.15 % ------ iProver source info
% 0.80/1.15
% 0.80/1.15 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.80/1.15 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.80/1.15 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.80/1.15
% 0.80/1.15 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 0.80/1.15
% 0.80/1.15
% 0.80/1.15 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...% ------ preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 0.80/1.15 %
% 0.80/1.15
% 0.80/1.15 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 76 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e %
% 0.80/1.15
% 0.80/1.15 % ------ Preprocessing...% ------ preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 0.80/1.15 gs_s sp: 88 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 0.80/1.15 % ------ Proving...
% 0.80/1.15 % ------ Problem Properties
% 0.80/1.15
% 0.80/1.15 %
% 0.80/1.15 % clauses 332
% 0.80/1.15 % conjectures 1
% 0.80/1.15 % EPR 332
% 0.80/1.15 % Horn 289
% 0.80/1.15 % unary 51
% 0.80/1.15 % binary 137
% 0.80/1.15 % lits 809
% 0.80/1.15 % lits eq 0
% 0.80/1.15 % fd_pure 0
% 0.80/1.15 % fd_pseudo 0
% 0.80/1.15 % fd_cond 0
% 0.80/1.15 % fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 0.80/1.15 % AC symbols 0
% 0.80/1.15
% 0.80/1.15 % ------ Schedule EPR non Horn non eq is on
% 0.80/1.15
% 0.80/1.15 % ------ no equalities: superposition off
% 0.80/1.15
% 0.80/1.15 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false" Time Limit: 70.
% 0.80/1.15
% 0.80/1.15
% 0.80/1.15 % ------
% 0.80/1.15 % Current options:
% 0.80/1.15 % ------
% 0.80/1.15
% 0.80/1.15
% 0.80/1.15 %
% 0.80/1.15
% 0.80/1.15 % ------ Proving...
% 0.80/1.15 %
% 0.80/1.15
% 0.80/1.15 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.80/1.15
% 0.80/1.15 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.80/1.15
% 0.80/1.15
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------