↑ Up

Twee---2.7.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : SYN267-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:47:26 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 6.79s 1.13s
% Output   : Proof 6.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN267-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.18  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.18  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 15:40:05 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.18  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.79/1.13  Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --complete-subsets --ground-joining-incomplete-limit 15 --flatten-every 2
% 6.79/1.13  
% 6.79/1.13  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 6.79/1.13  
% 6.79/1.13  % SZS output start Proof
% 6.79/1.13  Axiom 1 (axiom_19): m0(X, d, Y) = true.
% 6.79/1.13  Axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 6.79/1.13  Axiom 3 (rule_194): ifeq(k2(X, Y), true, k3(Y, Y, X), true) = true.
% 6.79/1.13  Axiom 4 (rule_129): ifeq(q1(X, Y, Y), true, k2(Y, Y), true) = true.
% 6.79/1.13  Axiom 5 (rule_287): ifeq(k3(X, X, Y), true, p4(X, Y, X), true) = true.
% 6.79/1.13  Axiom 6 (rule_107): ifeq(m0(e, d, X), true, ifeq(m0(X, d, X), true, q1(e, X, X), true), true) = true.
% 6.79/1.13  
% 6.79/1.13  Goal 1 (prove_this): p4(X, Y, c) = true.
% 6.79/1.13  The goal is true when:
% 6.79/1.13    X = c
% 6.79/1.13    Y = c
% 6.79/1.13  
% 6.79/1.13  Proof:
% 6.79/1.13    p4(c, c, c)
% 6.79/1.13  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 6.79/1.13    ifeq(true, true, p4(c, c, c), true)
% 6.79/1.13  = { by axiom 3 (rule_194) R->L }
% 6.79/1.13    ifeq(ifeq(k2(c, c), true, k3(c, c, c), true), true, p4(c, c, c), true)
% 6.79/1.13  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 6.79/1.13    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, k2(c, c), true), true, k3(c, c, c), true), true, p4(c, c, c), true)
% 6.79/1.13  = { by axiom 6 (rule_107) R->L }
% 6.79/1.13    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(m0(e, d, c), true, ifeq(m0(c, d, c), true, q1(e, c, c), true), true), true, k2(c, c), true), true, k3(c, c, c), true), true, p4(c, c, c), true)
% 6.79/1.13  = { by axiom 1 (axiom_19) }
% 6.79/1.13    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, ifeq(m0(c, d, c), true, q1(e, c, c), true), true), true, k2(c, c), true), true, k3(c, c, c), true), true, p4(c, c, c), true)
% 6.79/1.13  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 6.79/1.13    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(m0(c, d, c), true, q1(e, c, c), true), true, k2(c, c), true), true, k3(c, c, c), true), true, p4(c, c, c), true)
% 6.79/1.13  = { by axiom 1 (axiom_19) }
% 6.79/1.13    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, q1(e, c, c), true), true, k2(c, c), true), true, k3(c, c, c), true), true, p4(c, c, c), true)
% 6.79/1.13  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 6.79/1.13    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(q1(e, c, c), true, k2(c, c), true), true, k3(c, c, c), true), true, p4(c, c, c), true)
% 6.79/1.13  = { by axiom 4 (rule_129) }
% 6.79/1.13    ifeq(ifeq(true, true, k3(c, c, c), true), true, p4(c, c, c), true)
% 6.79/1.13  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 6.79/1.13    ifeq(k3(c, c, c), true, p4(c, c, c), true)
% 6.79/1.13  = { by axiom 5 (rule_287) }
% 6.79/1.13    true
% 6.79/1.13  % SZS output end Proof
% 6.79/1.13  
% 6.79/1.13  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------