↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SYN267-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qm1CuTJFK2 true

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 05:04:21 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.53s 0.85s
% Output   : Refutation 0.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.10  % Problem  : SYN267-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.03/0.11  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qm1CuTJFK2 true
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 13:30:53 EDT 2025
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.33  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.11/0.33  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.33  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.11/0.33  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.11/0.33  % Running in FO mode
% 0.49/0.59  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.49/0.59  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.49/0.59  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.51/0.69  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.51/0.69  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.51/0.69  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.51/0.70  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.51/0.70  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.51/0.70  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.51/0.71  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.53/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 0.53/0.85  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.53/0.85  % BCE start: 347
% 0.53/0.85  % BCE eliminated: 27
% 0.53/0.85  % PE start: 320
% 0.53/0.85  logic: neq
% 0.53/0.85  % PE eliminated: -45
% 0.53/0.85  % done 136 iterations in 0.131s
% 0.53/0.85  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.53/0.85  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.53/0.85  thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 0.53/0.85  thf(p1_type, type, p1: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.53/0.85  thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 0.53/0.85  thf(n2_type, type, n2: $i > $o).
% 0.53/0.85  thf(p3_type, type, p3: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.53/0.85  thf(n0_type, type, n0: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.53/0.85  thf(p4_type, type, p4: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.53/0.85  thf(axiom_26, axiom, (n0 @ d @ c)).
% 0.53/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain, ( (n0 @ d @ c)),
% 0.53/0.85      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_26])).
% 0.53/0.85  thf(rule_066, axiom, (( p1 @ G @ G @ G ) | ( ~( n0 @ H @ G ) ))).
% 0.53/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl103, plain,
% 0.53/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (p1 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (n0 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.53/0.85      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_066])).
% 0.53/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl635, plain, ( (p1 @ c @ c @ c)),
% 0.53/0.85      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl25, zip_derived_cl103])).
% 0.53/0.85  thf(rule_137, axiom, (( n2 @ A ) | ( ~( p1 @ B @ C @ A ) ))).
% 0.53/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl174, plain,
% 0.53/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: ( (n2 @ X0) | ~ (p1 @ X1 @ X2 @ X0))),
% 0.53/0.85      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_137])).
% 0.53/0.85  thf(rule_244, axiom, (( p3 @ H @ H @ H ) | ( ~( n2 @ H ) ))).
% 0.53/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl279, plain,
% 0.53/0.85      (![X0 : $i]: ( (p3 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (n2 @ X0))),
% 0.53/0.85      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_244])).
% 0.53/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl405, plain,
% 0.53/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.53/0.85         (~ (p1 @ X2 @ X1 @ X0) |  (p3 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0))),
% 0.53/0.85      inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 0.53/0.85                [zip_derived_cl174, zip_derived_cl279])).
% 0.53/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl724, plain, ( (p3 @ c @ c @ c)),
% 0.53/0.85      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl635, zip_derived_cl405])).
% 0.53/0.85  thf(rule_291, axiom, (( p4 @ I @ I @ I ) | ( ~( p3 @ J @ J @ I ) ))).
% 0.53/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl322, plain,
% 0.53/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (p4 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (p3 @ X1 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.53/0.85      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_291])).
% 0.53/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl727, plain, ( (p4 @ c @ c @ c)),
% 0.53/0.85      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl724, zip_derived_cl322])).
% 0.53/0.85  thf(prove_this, conjecture, (p4 @ X @ Y @ c)).
% 0.53/0.85  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( p4 @ X @ Y @ c )),
% 0.53/0.85    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_this])).
% 0.53/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl346, plain, (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ~ (p4 @ X0 @ X1 @ c)),
% 0.53/0.85      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.53/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl729, plain, ($false),
% 0.53/0.85      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl727, zip_derived_cl346])).
% 0.53/0.85  
% 0.53/0.85  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.53/0.85  
% 0.53/0.85  
% 0.53/0.85  % Terminating...
% 0.57/0.91  % Runner terminated.
% 0.57/0.93  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------