↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SYN268-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.r7PHHe1L8X true

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 05:04:21 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.26s 0.83s
% Output   : Refutation 1.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.01/0.09  % Problem  : SYN268-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.09/0.10  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.r7PHHe1L8X true
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 13:46:08 EDT 2025
% 0.10/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.30  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.10/0.30  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.30  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.10/0.31  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.10/0.31  % Running in FO mode
% 0.15/0.55  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.15/0.55  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.15/0.55  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.92/0.66  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.92/0.66  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.92/0.67  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.92/0.67  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.92/0.67  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.92/0.67  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.92/0.67  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.22/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 1.26/0.83  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 1.26/0.83  % BCE start: 347
% 1.26/0.83  % BCE eliminated: 27
% 1.26/0.83  % PE start: 320
% 1.26/0.83  logic: neq
% 1.26/0.83  % PE eliminated: -45
% 1.26/0.83  % done 136 iterations in 0.147s
% 1.26/0.83  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.26/0.83  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.26/0.83  thf(p1_type, type, p1: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 1.26/0.83  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 1.26/0.83  thf(l0_type, type, l0: $i > $o).
% 1.26/0.83  thf(n2_type, type, n2: $i > $o).
% 1.26/0.83  thf(p3_type, type, p3: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 1.26/0.83  thf(p4_type, type, p4: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 1.26/0.83  thf(rule_088, axiom, (( p1 @ a @ a @ a ) | ( ~( l0 @ a ) ))).
% 1.26/0.83  thf(zip_derived_cl125, plain, (( (p1 @ a @ a @ a) | ~ (l0 @ a))),
% 1.26/0.83      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_088])).
% 1.26/0.83  thf(axiom_20, axiom, (l0 @ a)).
% 1.26/0.83  thf(zip_derived_cl19, plain, ( (l0 @ a)),
% 1.26/0.83      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_20])).
% 1.26/0.83  thf(zip_derived_cl590, plain, ( (p1 @ a @ a @ a)),
% 1.26/0.83      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl125, zip_derived_cl19])).
% 1.26/0.83  thf(rule_137, axiom, (( n2 @ A ) | ( ~( p1 @ B @ C @ A ) ))).
% 1.26/0.83  thf(zip_derived_cl174, plain,
% 1.26/0.83      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: ( (n2 @ X0) | ~ (p1 @ X1 @ X2 @ X0))),
% 1.26/0.83      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_137])).
% 1.26/0.83  thf(rule_244, axiom, (( p3 @ H @ H @ H ) | ( ~( n2 @ H ) ))).
% 1.26/0.83  thf(zip_derived_cl279, plain,
% 1.26/0.83      (![X0 : $i]: ( (p3 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (n2 @ X0))),
% 1.26/0.83      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_244])).
% 1.26/0.83  thf(zip_derived_cl405, plain,
% 1.26/0.83      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.26/0.83         (~ (p1 @ X2 @ X1 @ X0) |  (p3 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0))),
% 1.26/0.83      inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 1.26/0.83                [zip_derived_cl174, zip_derived_cl279])).
% 1.26/0.83  thf(zip_derived_cl729, plain, ( (p3 @ a @ a @ a)),
% 1.26/0.83      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl590, zip_derived_cl405])).
% 1.26/0.83  thf(rule_291, axiom, (( p4 @ I @ I @ I ) | ( ~( p3 @ J @ J @ I ) ))).
% 1.26/0.83  thf(zip_derived_cl322, plain,
% 1.26/0.83      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (p4 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (p3 @ X1 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 1.26/0.83      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_291])).
% 1.26/0.83  thf(zip_derived_cl731, plain, ( (p4 @ a @ a @ a)),
% 1.26/0.83      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl729, zip_derived_cl322])).
% 1.26/0.83  thf(prove_this, conjecture, (p4 @ a @ X @ Y)).
% 1.26/0.83  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( p4 @ a @ X @ Y )),
% 1.26/0.83    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_this])).
% 1.26/0.83  thf(zip_derived_cl346, plain, (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ~ (p4 @ a @ X0 @ X1)),
% 1.26/0.83      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.26/0.83  thf(zip_derived_cl733, plain, ($false),
% 1.26/0.83      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl731, zip_derived_cl346])).
% 1.26/0.83  
% 1.26/0.83  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.26/0.83  
% 1.26/0.83  
% 1.26/0.83  % Terminating...
% 1.88/0.88  % Runner terminated.
% 1.88/0.89  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------