↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SYN270-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:32:55 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   23
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   79 (  32 unt;   0 nHn;  65 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  162 (   0 equ;  86 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   19 (  18 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  117 (  38 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_085,axiom,
    ( ~ p0(X2,X1)
    | p1(X1,X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_085) ).

cnf(rule_137,axiom,
    ( ~ p1(X2,X3,X1)
    | n2(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_137) ).

cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
    p0(b,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_14) ).

cnf(rule_001,axiom,
    ( ~ n0(X2,X1)
    | k1(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_001) ).

cnf(rule_174,axiom,
    ( ~ k1(e)
    | ~ n2(X1)
    | p2(X1,X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_174) ).

cnf(axiom_30,axiom,
    n0(e,e),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_30) ).

cnf(rule_029,axiom,
    ( ~ s0(X1)
    | ~ p0(X1,X2)
    | m1(X1,X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_029) ).

cnf(rule_110,axiom,
    ( ~ m0(X2,X3,X1)
    | q1(X1,X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_110) ).

cnf(rule_267,axiom,
    ( ~ p2(X1,X3,X2)
    | r3(X1,X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_267) ).

cnf(rule_127,axiom,
    ( ~ k2(X4,X2)
    | ~ k1(X4)
    | ~ m1(X3,X2,X1)
    | k2(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_127) ).

cnf(axiom_5,axiom,
    s0(b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_5) ).

cnf(rule_129,axiom,
    ( ~ q1(X2,X1,X1)
    | k2(X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_129) ).

cnf(axiom_19,axiom,
    m0(X1,d,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_19) ).

cnf(rule_124,axiom,
    ( ~ q1(d,X2,d)
    | ~ s0(d)
    | ~ q0(X1,X2)
    | r1(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_124) ).

cnf(rule_272,axiom,
    ( ~ r3(X3,X1,X1)
    | ~ r2(X3)
    | ~ k2(X2,X3)
    | r3(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_272) ).

cnf(axiom_1,axiom,
    s0(d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_1) ).

cnf(rule_188,axiom,
    ( ~ l0(X1)
    | ~ r1(X1)
    | r2(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_188) ).

cnf(axiom_17,axiom,
    q0(X1,d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_17) ).

cnf(rule_285,axiom,
    ( ~ r3(X2,X1,X2)
    | ~ r0(X1)
    | p4(X1,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_285) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p4(b,b,c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(axiom_9,axiom,
    r0(b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_9) ).

cnf(axiom_26,axiom,
    n0(d,c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_26) ).

cnf(axiom_24,axiom,
    l0(c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_24) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ p0(X2,X1)
    | p1(X1,X1,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_085]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ p1(X2,X3,X1)
    | n2(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_137]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ p0(X2,X1)
    | p1(X1,X1,X1) ),
    c_0_23 ).

cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
    p0(b,X1),
    axiom_14 ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ n0(X2,X1)
    | k1(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_001]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ k1(e)
    | ~ n2(X1)
    | p2(X1,X1,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_174]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ p1(X2,X3,X1)
    | n2(X1) ),
    c_0_24 ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    p1(X1,X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ n0(X2,X1)
    | k1(X1) ),
    c_0_27 ).

cnf(c_0_32,axiom,
    n0(e,e),
    axiom_30 ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ s0(X1)
    | ~ p0(X1,X2)
    | m1(X1,X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_029]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ m0(X2,X3,X1)
    | q1(X1,X1,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_110]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ p2(X1,X3,X2)
    | r3(X1,X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_267]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ k1(e)
    | ~ n2(X1)
    | p2(X1,X1,X1) ),
    c_0_28 ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    n2(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    k1(e),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ k2(X4,X2)
    | ~ k1(X4)
    | ~ m1(X3,X2,X1)
    | k2(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_127]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( ~ s0(X1)
    | ~ p0(X1,X2)
    | m1(X1,X2,X1) ),
    c_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_41,axiom,
    s0(b),
    axiom_5 ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ( ~ q1(X2,X1,X1)
    | k2(X1,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_129]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( ~ m0(X2,X3,X1)
    | q1(X1,X1,X1) ),
    c_0_34 ).

cnf(c_0_44,axiom,
    m0(X1,d,X2),
    axiom_19 ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ( ~ q1(d,X2,d)
    | ~ s0(d)
    | ~ q0(X1,X2)
    | r1(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_124]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    ( ~ r3(X3,X1,X1)
    | ~ r2(X3)
    | ~ k2(X2,X3)
    | r3(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_272]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    ( ~ p2(X1,X3,X2)
    | r3(X1,X2,X1) ),
    c_0_35 ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    p2(X1,X1,X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_38])]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    ( ~ k2(X4,X2)
    | ~ k1(X4)
    | ~ m1(X3,X2,X1)
    | k2(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_39 ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    m1(b,X1,b),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_26]),c_0_41])]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    ( ~ q1(X2,X1,X1)
    | k2(X1,X1) ),
    c_0_42 ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    q1(X1,X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    ( ~ q1(d,X2,d)
    | ~ s0(d)
    | ~ q0(X1,X2)
    | r1(X1) ),
    c_0_45 ).

cnf(c_0_54,axiom,
    s0(d),
    axiom_1 ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    ( ~ r3(X3,X1,X1)
    | ~ r2(X3)
    | ~ k2(X2,X3)
    | r3(X1,X2,X3) ),
    c_0_46 ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    r3(X1,X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    ( ~ k1(X2)
    | ~ k2(X2,X1)
    | k2(b,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    k2(X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    ( ~ l0(X1)
    | ~ r1(X1)
    | r2(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_188]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,plain,
    ( ~ q0(X1,X2)
    | ~ q1(d,X2,d)
    | r1(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54])]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,axiom,
    q0(X1,d),
    axiom_17 ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    ( ~ k2(X2,X1)
    | ~ r2(X1)
    | r3(X1,X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    ( ~ k1(X1)
    | k2(b,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    ( ~ l0(X1)
    | ~ r1(X1)
    | r2(X1) ),
    c_0_59 ).

cnf(c_0_65,plain,
    r1(X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]),c_0_52])]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,plain,
    ( ~ r3(X2,X1,X2)
    | ~ r0(X1)
    | p4(X1,X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_285]) ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    ( ~ k1(X1)
    | ~ r2(X1)
    | r3(X1,b,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_63]) ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    ( ~ l0(X1)
    | r2(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65])]) ).

cnf(c_0_69,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p4(b,b,c),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).

cnf(c_0_70,plain,
    ( ~ r3(X2,X1,X2)
    | ~ r0(X1)
    | p4(X1,X1,X2) ),
    c_0_66 ).

cnf(c_0_71,plain,
    ( ~ l0(X1)
    | ~ k1(X1)
    | r3(X1,b,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_67,c_0_68]) ).

cnf(c_0_72,axiom,
    r0(b),
    axiom_9 ).

cnf(c_0_73,axiom,
    n0(d,c),
    axiom_26 ).

cnf(c_0_74,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p4(b,b,c),
    c_0_69 ).

cnf(c_0_75,plain,
    ( ~ l0(X1)
    | ~ k1(X1)
    | p4(b,b,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_71]),c_0_72])]) ).

cnf(c_0_76,plain,
    k1(c),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_73]) ).

cnf(c_0_77,axiom,
    l0(c),
    axiom_24 ).

cnf(c_0_78,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_75]),c_0_76]),c_0_77])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN270-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:47:33 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.49  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.17/0.49  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.49  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.49  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.49  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 3272798 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.49  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.17/0.49  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.49  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.49  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.49  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.17/0.49  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.49  % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.49  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.49  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  % SubtermCWHack with pid 3272802 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.49  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.17/0.49  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.49  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.49  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.49  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.17/0.49  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.49  % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.49  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.49  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  % Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.49  
% 0.17/0.49  % Proof found!
% 0.17/0.49  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.49  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.49  % Parsed axioms                        : 369
% 0.17/0.49  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.17/0.49  % Initial clauses                      : 369
% 0.17/0.49  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 7
% 0.17/0.49  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 362
% 0.17/0.49  % Processed clauses                    : 1029
% 0.17/0.49  % ...of these trivial                  : 116
% 0.17/0.49  % ...subsumed                          : 100
% 0.17/0.49  % ...remaining for further processing  : 813
% 0.17/0.49  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.17/0.49  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.17/0.49  % Backward-subsumed                    : 84
% 0.17/0.49  % Backward-rewritten                   : 231
% 0.17/0.49  % Generated clauses                    : 1216
% 0.17/0.49  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 870
% 0.17/0.49  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.17/0.49  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.17/0.49  % Paramodulations                      : 1216
% 0.17/0.49  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.17/0.49  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.17/0.49  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.17/0.49  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.17/0.49  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1026
% 0.17/0.49  % ...of those cached                   : 673
% 0.17/0.49  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.17/0.49  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.17/0.49  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.49  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.17/0.49  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.49  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.17/0.49  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49  % Current number of processed clauses  : 498
% 0.17/0.49  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 207
% 0.17/0.49  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.49  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.17/0.49  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 289
% 0.17/0.49  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 101
% 0.17/0.49  % ...number of literals in the above   : 419
% 0.17/0.49  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.17/0.49  % Current number of archived clauses   : 315
% 0.17/0.49  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 23037
% 0.17/0.49  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18810
% 0.17/0.49  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 168
% 0.17/0.49  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2008
% 0.17/0.49  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.17/0.49  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 371
% 0.17/0.49  % BW rewrite match successes           : 195
% 0.17/0.49  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.17/0.49  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.17/0.49  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 25724
% 0.17/0.49  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1461
% 0.17/0.49  
% 0.17/0.49  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.49  % User time                : 0.041 s
% 0.17/0.49  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.49  % Total time               : 0.044 s
% 0.17/0.49  % Maximum resident set size: 4472 pages
% 0.17/0.49  
% 0.17/0.49  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.49  % User time                : 0.140 s
% 0.17/0.49  % System time              : 0.021 s
% 0.17/0.49  % Total time               : 0.161 s
% 0.17/0.49  % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.17/0.49  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------