↑ Up

Metis---2.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : SYN272-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 09:00:53 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.38s 0.56s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   51 (  24 unt;   0 nHn;  41 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   93 (   0 equ;  44 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  11 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (  15 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_1,axiom,
    s0(d) ).

cnf(axiom_5,axiom,
    s0(b) ).

cnf(axiom_13,axiom,
    r0(e) ).

cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
    p0(b,X) ).

cnf(axiom_15,axiom,
    n0(a,b) ).

cnf(axiom_28,axiom,
    k0(e) ).

cnf(axiom_34,axiom,
    n0(c,d) ).

cnf(rule_001,axiom,
    ( k1(I)
    | ~ n0(J,I) ) ).

cnf(rule_007,axiom,
    ( m1(G,H,G)
    | ~ p0(I,H)
    | ~ r0(G) ) ).

cnf(rule_029,axiom,
    ( m1(H,I,H)
    | ~ p0(H,I)
    | ~ s0(H) ) ).

cnf(rule_117,axiom,
    ( q1(d,d,d)
    | ~ k0(e)
    | ~ s0(d) ) ).

cnf(rule_127,axiom,
    ( k2(C,D)
    | ~ m1(E,D,C)
    | ~ k1(F)
    | ~ k2(F,D) ) ).

cnf(rule_129,axiom,
    ( k2(J,J)
    | ~ q1(A,J,J) ) ).

cnf(rule_194,axiom,
    ( k3(F,F,G)
    | ~ k2(G,F) ) ).

cnf(rule_287,axiom,
    ( p4(B,C,B)
    | ~ k3(B,B,C) ) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p4(d,e,X) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    ( ~ k3(d,d,e)
    | p4(d,e,d) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_287:[bind(B,$fot(d)),bind(C,$fot(e))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    ( ~ k2(e,d)
    | k3(d,d,e) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_194:[bind(F,$fot(d)),bind(G,$fot(e))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    ( ~ s0(d)
    | q1(d,d,d) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( k0(e) )],[axiom_28,rule_117]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    q1(d,d,d),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( s0(d) )],[axiom_1,refute_0_2]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    ( ~ q1(d,d,d)
    | k2(d,d) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_129:[bind(A,$fot(d)),bind(J,$fot(d))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    k2(d,d),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( q1(d,d,d) )],[refute_0_3,refute_0_4]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    p0(b,X_180),
    inference(subst,[],[axiom_14:[bind(X,$fot(X_180))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    ( ~ p0(b,X_180)
    | ~ s0(b)
    | m1(b,X_180,b) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_029:[bind(H,$fot(b)),bind(I,$fot(X_180))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ s0(b)
    | m1(b,X_180,b) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( p0(b,X_180) )],[refute_0_6,refute_0_7]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    m1(b,X_180,b),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( s0(b) )],[axiom_5,refute_0_8]) ).

cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
    m1(b,X_742,b),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_9:[bind(X_180,$fot(X_742))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ k1(X_744)
    | ~ k2(X_744,X_742)
    | ~ m1(b,X_742,b)
    | k2(b,X_742) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_127:[bind(C,$fot(b)),bind(D,$fot(X_742)),bind(E,$fot(b)),bind(F,$fot(X_744))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ k1(X_744)
    | ~ k2(X_744,X_742)
    | k2(b,X_742) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( m1(b,X_742,b) )],[refute_0_10,refute_0_11]) ).

cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ k1(d)
    | ~ k2(d,d)
    | k2(b,d) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_12:[bind(X_742,$fot(d)),bind(X_744,$fot(d))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ k1(d)
    | k2(b,d) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( k2(d,d) )],[refute_0_5,refute_0_13]) ).

cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ n0(c,d)
    | k1(d) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_001:[bind(I,$fot(d)),bind(J,$fot(c))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
    k1(d),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( n0(c,d) )],[axiom_34,refute_0_15]) ).

cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
    k2(b,d),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( k1(d) )],[refute_0_16,refute_0_14]) ).

cnf(refute_0_18,plain,
    p0(b,X_273),
    inference(subst,[],[axiom_14:[bind(X,$fot(X_273))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ p0(b,X_273)
    | ~ r0(X_272)
    | m1(X_272,X_273,X_272) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_007:[bind(G,$fot(X_272)),bind(H,$fot(X_273)),bind(I,$fot(b))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ r0(X_272)
    | m1(X_272,X_273,X_272) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( p0(b,X_273) )],[refute_0_18,refute_0_19]) ).

cnf(refute_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ r0(e)
    | m1(e,X_276,e) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_20:[bind(X_272,$fot(e)),bind(X_273,$fot(X_276))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_22,plain,
    m1(e,X_276,e),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( r0(e) )],[axiom_13,refute_0_21]) ).

cnf(refute_0_23,plain,
    m1(e,X_742,e),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_22:[bind(X_276,$fot(X_742))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ k1(X_744)
    | ~ k2(X_744,X_742)
    | ~ m1(e,X_742,e)
    | k2(e,X_742) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_127:[bind(C,$fot(e)),bind(D,$fot(X_742)),bind(E,$fot(e)),bind(F,$fot(X_744))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ k1(X_744)
    | ~ k2(X_744,X_742)
    | k2(e,X_742) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( m1(e,X_742,e) )],[refute_0_23,refute_0_24]) ).

cnf(refute_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ k1(b)
    | ~ k2(b,d)
    | k2(e,d) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_25:[bind(X_742,$fot(d)),bind(X_744,$fot(b))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ k1(b)
    | k2(e,d) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( k2(b,d) )],[refute_0_17,refute_0_26]) ).

cnf(refute_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ n0(a,b)
    | k1(b) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_001:[bind(I,$fot(b)),bind(J,$fot(a))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_29,plain,
    k1(b),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( n0(a,b) )],[axiom_15,refute_0_28]) ).

cnf(refute_0_30,plain,
    k2(e,d),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( k1(b) )],[refute_0_29,refute_0_27]) ).

cnf(refute_0_31,plain,
    k3(d,d,e),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( k2(e,d) )],[refute_0_30,refute_0_1]) ).

cnf(refute_0_32,plain,
    p4(d,e,d),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( k3(d,d,e) )],[refute_0_31,refute_0_0]) ).

cnf(refute_0_33,plain,
    ~ p4(d,e,d),
    inference(subst,[],[prove_this:[bind(X,$fot(d))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_34,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( p4(d,e,d) )],[refute_0_32,refute_0_33]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : SYN272-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.08/0.13  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 00:50:58 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.38/0.56  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/0.56  
% 0.38/0.56  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.38/0.56  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------