%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN275-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:32:56 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 5.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 6 ( 0 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ q0(d,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(axiom_29,axiom,
q0(d,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_29) ).
cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ q0(d,X1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
q0(d,b),
axiom_29 ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ q0(d,X1),
c_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN275-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/5.53 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/5.53 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/5.53 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/5.53 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/5.53 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/5.53 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/5.53 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/5.53 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:49:49 UTC 2026
% 0.11/5.54 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/5.54 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/5.58 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/5.58 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.61 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/5.61 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.61 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.61 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.61 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.61 % new_bool_1 with pid 1690993 completed with status 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.15/5.61 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.61 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.61 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.61 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/5.61 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/5.61 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.61 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/5.61 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.61 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1690995 completed with status 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/5.61 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.61 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.61 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.61 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/5.61 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/5.61 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.61 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/5.61 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.61 % Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/5.61
% 0.15/5.61 % Proof found!
% 0.15/5.61 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/5.61 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/5.61 % Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.15/5.61 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 112
% 0.15/5.61 % Initial clauses : 257
% 0.15/5.61 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.15/5.61 % Initial clauses in saturation : 252
% 0.15/5.61 % Processed clauses : 29
% 0.15/5.61 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % ...remaining for further processing : 29
% 0.15/5.61 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.15/5.61 % Generated clauses : 3
% 0.15/5.61 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Paramodulations : 1
% 0.15/5.61 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Total rewrite steps : 4
% 0.15/5.61 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.61 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.61 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.61 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.61 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.61 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.61 % Current number of processed clauses : 23
% 0.15/5.61 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 22
% 0.15/5.61 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/5.61 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 223
% 0.15/5.61 % ...number of literals in the above : 651
% 0.15/5.61 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 0.15/5.61 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.15/5.61 % BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.15/5.61 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/5.61 % Termbank termtop insertions : 9076
% 0.15/5.61 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1589
% 0.15/5.61
% 0.15/5.61 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/5.61 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.15/5.61 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/5.61 % Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.15/5.61 % Maximum resident set size: 4216 pages
% 0.15/5.61
% 0.15/5.61 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/5.61 % User time : 0.015 s
% 0.15/5.61 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/5.61 % Total time : 0.022 s
% 0.15/5.61 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.15/5.61 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------