%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN285-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:23:33 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 28 ( 16 unt; 0 nHn; 23 RR)
% Number of literals : 54 ( 0 equ; 29 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 9 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_109,axiom,
( ~ k1(X1)
| ~ q0(X2,X1)
| ~ p0(X3,X3)
| q1(X1,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_109) ).
cnf(rule_001,axiom,
( ~ n0(X2,X1)
| k1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_001) ).
cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_14) ).
cnf(axiom_34,axiom,
n0(c,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_34) ).
cnf(rule_099,axiom,
( ~ q1(X2,X2,X3)
| ~ l0(X1)
| ~ k0(X3)
| q1(X1,X2,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_099) ).
cnf(axiom_17,axiom,
q0(X1,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_17) ).
cnf(axiom_32,axiom,
k0(b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_32) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ q1(a,d,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(axiom_20,axiom,
l0(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_20) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ k1(X1)
| ~ q0(X2,X1)
| ~ p0(X3,X3)
| q1(X1,X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_109]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ n0(X2,X1)
| k1(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_001]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ k1(X1)
| ~ q0(X2,X1)
| ~ p0(X3,X3)
| q1(X1,X1,X2) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
axiom_14 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ n0(X2,X1)
| k1(X1) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
n0(c,d),
axiom_34 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ q1(X2,X2,X3)
| ~ l0(X1)
| ~ k0(X3)
| q1(X1,X2,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_099]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ q0(X2,X1)
| ~ k1(X1)
| q1(X1,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
q0(X1,d),
axiom_17 ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
k1(d),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ q1(X2,X2,X3)
| ~ l0(X1)
| ~ k0(X3)
| q1(X1,X2,X2) ),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
q1(d,d,X1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ l0(X1)
| ~ k0(X2)
| q1(X1,d,d) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
k0(b),
axiom_32 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
~ q1(a,d,d),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ l0(X1)
| q1(X1,d,d) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
l0(a),
axiom_20 ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ q1(a,d,d),
c_0_23 ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN285-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:48:11 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % new_bool_3 with pid 1709738 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.13/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.45 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1709741 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.13/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.45 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.45
% 0.13/0.45 % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.45 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.13/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 160
% 0.13/0.45 % Initial clauses : 209
% 0.13/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.13/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 204
% 0.13/0.45 % Processed clauses : 403
% 0.13/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 49
% 0.13/0.45 % ...subsumed : 11
% 0.13/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 343
% 0.13/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 31
% 0.13/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 102
% 0.13/0.45 % Generated clauses : 443
% 0.13/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 284
% 0.13/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.13/0.45 % Paramodulations : 443
% 0.13/0.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 393
% 0.13/0.45 % ...of those cached : 238
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 210
% 0.13/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 117
% 0.13/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.13/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 92
% 0.13/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 39
% 0.13/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 139
% 0.13/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 133
% 0.13/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3865
% 0.13/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3431
% 0.13/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 39
% 0.13/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 254
% 0.13/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 212
% 0.13/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 89
% 0.13/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 12598
% 0.13/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1643
% 0.13/0.45
% 0.13/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.45 % User time : 0.019 s
% 0.13/0.45 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.13/0.45 % Total time : 0.024 s
% 0.13/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4216 pages
% 0.13/0.45
% 0.13/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.45 % User time : 0.027 s
% 0.13/0.45 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.13/0.45 % Total time : 0.035 s
% 0.13/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.13/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------