%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN286-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:23:33 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 20 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 12 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_092,axiom,
( ~ p0(X4,X1)
| ~ n0(X3,X2)
| q1(X1,X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_092) ).
cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_14) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ q1(a,e,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(axiom_30,axiom,
n0(e,e),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_30) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ p0(X4,X1)
| ~ n0(X3,X2)
| q1(X1,X2,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_092]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ p0(X4,X1)
| ~ n0(X3,X2)
| q1(X1,X2,X1) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
axiom_14 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ q1(a,e,X1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ n0(X3,X2)
| q1(X1,X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
n0(e,e),
axiom_30 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ q1(a,e,X1),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
q1(X1,e,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SYN286-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:48:48 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.35 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.39 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.43 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.43 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43 % new_bool_3 with pid 2734401 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.12/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.43 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.12/0.43 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.12/0.43 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.43 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2734404 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.12/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.43 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.12/0.43 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.12/0.43 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.43 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.12/0.43
% 0.12/0.43 % Proof found!
% 0.12/0.43 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.43 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.43 % Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.12/0.43 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 160
% 0.12/0.43 % Initial clauses : 209
% 0.12/0.43 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.12/0.43 % Initial clauses in saturation : 204
% 0.12/0.43 % Processed clauses : 244
% 0.12/0.43 % ...of these trivial : 27
% 0.12/0.43 % ...subsumed : 5
% 0.12/0.43 % ...remaining for further processing : 212
% 0.12/0.43 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Backward-subsumed : 13
% 0.12/0.43 % Backward-rewritten : 74
% 0.12/0.43 % Generated clauses : 215
% 0.12/0.43 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 124
% 0.12/0.43 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.12/0.43 % Paramodulations : 215
% 0.12/0.43 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % NegExts : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Total rewrite steps : 231
% 0.12/0.43 % ...of those cached : 124
% 0.12/0.43 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43 % Current number of processed clauses : 125
% 0.12/0.43 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 84
% 0.12/0.43 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.12/0.43 % Non-unit-clauses : 40
% 0.12/0.43 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 79
% 0.12/0.43 % ...number of literals in the above : 274
% 0.12/0.43 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Current number of archived clauses : 87
% 0.12/0.43 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1220
% 0.12/0.43 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1101
% 0.12/0.43 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 15
% 0.12/0.43 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 175
% 0.12/0.43 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % BW rewrite match attempts : 136
% 0.12/0.43 % BW rewrite match successes : 61
% 0.12/0.43 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.12/0.43 % Termbank termtop insertions : 9917
% 0.12/0.43 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1643
% 0.12/0.43
% 0.12/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.43 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.12/0.43 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.12/0.43 % Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.12/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 4216 pages
% 0.12/0.43
% 0.12/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.43 % User time : 0.013 s
% 0.12/0.43 % System time : 0.013 s
% 0.12/0.43 % Total time : 0.026 s
% 0.12/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.12/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------