%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : SYN298-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:47:49 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.38s 1.55s
% Output : Refutation 1.38s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 36 ( 0 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 15 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ s3(b,X4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
p0(b,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_14) ).
cnf(rule_125,axiom,
( s1(X10)
| ~ p0(X10,X10) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_125) ).
cnf(c8,plain,
s1(b),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[rule_125,axiom_14]) ).
cnf(axiom_17,axiom,
q0(X3,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_17) ).
cnf(rule_126,axiom,
( s1(X181)
| ~ q0(X181,X182)
| ~ s1(X183) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_126) ).
cnf(c219,plain,
( s1(X185)
| ~ s1(X184) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[rule_126,axiom_17]) ).
cnf(c223,plain,
s1(X186),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c219,c8]) ).
cnf(rule_085,axiom,
( p1(X103,X103,X103)
| ~ p0(X104,X103) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_085) ).
cnf(c128,plain,
p1(X105,X105,X105),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[rule_085,axiom_14]) ).
cnf(rule_181,axiom,
( q2(X230,X230,X230)
| ~ p1(X230,X230,X230) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_181) ).
cnf(c272,plain,
q2(X231,X231,X231),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[rule_181,c128]) ).
cnf(rule_189,axiom,
( s2(X685)
| ~ q2(b,X685,b)
| ~ s1(b) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_189) ).
cnf(c779,plain,
( s2(b)
| ~ s1(b) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[rule_189,c272]) ).
cnf(c781,plain,
s2(b),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c779,c223]) ).
cnf(axiom_19,axiom,
m0(X5,d,X6),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_19) ).
cnf(rule_273,axiom,
( s3(X902,X900)
| ~ q2(X901,X902,X901)
| ~ s2(X902)
| ~ m0(X901,X899,X900) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_273) ).
cnf(c1144,plain,
( s3(X909,X908)
| ~ q2(X910,X909,X910)
| ~ s2(X909) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[rule_273,axiom_19]) ).
cnf(c1157,plain,
( s3(X912,X911)
| ~ s2(X912) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c1144,c272]) ).
cnf(c1162,plain,
s3(b,X914),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c1157,c781]) ).
cnf(c1163,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c1162,prove_this]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : SYN298-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Wed May 8 20:07:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 1.38/1.55 % Version: 1.5
% 1.38/1.55 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.38/1.55 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.38/1.55
% 1.38/1.55 % Initial clauses : 369
% 1.38/1.55 % Processed clauses : 723
% 1.38/1.55 % Factors computed : 8
% 1.38/1.55 % Resolvents computed: 1156
% 1.38/1.55 % Tautologies deleted: 11
% 1.38/1.55 % Forward subsumed : 433
% 1.38/1.55 % Backward subsumed : 267
% 1.38/1.55 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 1.38/1.55 % User time : 1.178 s
% 1.38/1.55 % System time : 0.018 s
% 1.38/1.55 % Total time : 1.196 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------