↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SYN299-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WIC6xoJMIy true

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 05:04:25 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 1.03s
% Output   : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SYN299-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.14/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WIC6xoJMIy true
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 13:24:08 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.34  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.34  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.20/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.20/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.56/0.66  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.56/0.66  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.56/0.66  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.58/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.58/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.58/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.58/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.58/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.58/0.81  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.58/0.82  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.59/0.88  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 0.60/1.03  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.60/1.03  % BCE start: 369
% 0.60/1.03  % BCE eliminated: 40
% 0.60/1.03  % PE start: 329
% 0.60/1.03  logic: neq
% 0.60/1.03  % PE eliminated: -6
% 0.60/1.03  % done 232 iterations in 0.218s
% 0.60/1.03  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.60/1.03  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.60/1.03  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.60/1.03  thf(s2_type, type, s2: $i > $o).
% 0.60/1.03  thf(q2_type, type, q2: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.60/1.03  thf(p1_type, type, p1: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.60/1.03  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.60/1.03  thf(m0_type, type, m0: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.60/1.03  thf(p0_type, type, p0: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.60/1.03  thf(s3_type, type, s3: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.60/1.03  thf(s1_type, type, s1: $i > $o).
% 0.60/1.03  thf(axiom_38, axiom, (m0 @ b @ a @ a)).
% 0.60/1.03  thf(zip_derived_cl37, plain, ( (m0 @ b @ a @ a)),
% 0.60/1.03      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_38])).
% 0.60/1.03  thf(rule_189, axiom,
% 0.60/1.03    (( s2 @ H ) | ( ~( q2 @ b @ H @ b ) ) | ( ~( s1 @ b ) ))).
% 0.60/1.03  thf(zip_derived_cl226, plain,
% 0.60/1.03      (![X0 : $i]: ( (s2 @ X0) | ~ (q2 @ b @ X0 @ b) | ~ (s1 @ b))),
% 0.60/1.03      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_189])).
% 0.60/1.03  thf(axiom_14, axiom, (p0 @ b @ X)).
% 0.60/1.03  thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (p0 @ b @ X0)),
% 0.60/1.03      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_14])).
% 0.60/1.03  thf(rule_125, axiom, (( s1 @ I ) | ( ~( p0 @ I @ I ) ))).
% 0.60/1.03  thf(zip_derived_cl162, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ( (s1 @ X0) | ~ (p0 @ X0 @ X0))),
% 0.60/1.03      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_125])).
% 0.60/1.03  thf(zip_derived_cl679, plain, ( (s1 @ b)),
% 0.60/1.03      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl162])).
% 0.60/1.03  thf(zip_derived_cl768, plain,
% 0.60/1.03      (![X0 : $i]: ( (s2 @ X0) | ~ (q2 @ b @ X0 @ b))),
% 0.60/1.03      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl226, zip_derived_cl679])).
% 0.60/1.03  thf(rule_273, axiom,
% 0.60/1.03    (( s3 @ I @ J ) | ( ~( q2 @ A @ I @ A ) ) | ( ~( s2 @ I ) ) | 
% 0.60/1.03     ( ~( m0 @ A @ B @ J ) ))).
% 0.60/1.03  thf(zip_derived_cl310, plain,
% 0.60/1.03      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.60/1.03         ( (s3 @ X0 @ X1)
% 0.60/1.03          | ~ (q2 @ X2 @ X0 @ X2)
% 0.60/1.03          | ~ (s2 @ X0)
% 0.60/1.03          | ~ (m0 @ X2 @ X3 @ X1))),
% 0.60/1.03      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_273])).
% 0.60/1.03  thf(prove_this, conjecture, (s3 @ b @ a)).
% 0.60/1.03  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( s3 @ b @ a )),
% 0.60/1.03    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_this])).
% 0.60/1.04  thf(zip_derived_cl368, plain, (~ (s3 @ b @ a)),
% 0.60/1.04      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.60/1.04  thf(zip_derived_cl373, plain,
% 0.60/1.04      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/1.04         (~ (m0 @ X1 @ X0 @ a) | ~ (s2 @ b) | ~ (q2 @ X1 @ b @ X1))),
% 0.60/1.04      inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 0.60/1.04                [zip_derived_cl310, zip_derived_cl368])).
% 0.60/1.04  thf(zip_derived_cl853, plain,
% 0.60/1.04      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/1.04         (~ (q2 @ b @ b @ b) | ~ (m0 @ X1 @ X0 @ a) | ~ (q2 @ X1 @ b @ X1))),
% 0.60/1.04      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl768, zip_derived_cl373])).
% 0.60/1.04  thf(rule_181, axiom, (( q2 @ I @ I @ I ) | ( ~( p1 @ I @ I @ I ) ))).
% 0.60/1.04  thf(zip_derived_cl218, plain,
% 0.60/1.04      (![X0 : $i]: ( (q2 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (p1 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0))),
% 0.60/1.04      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_181])).
% 0.60/1.04  thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (p0 @ b @ X0)),
% 0.60/1.04      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_14])).
% 0.60/1.04  thf(rule_085, axiom, (( p1 @ B @ B @ B ) | ( ~( p0 @ C @ B ) ))).
% 0.60/1.04  thf(zip_derived_cl122, plain,
% 0.60/1.04      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (p1 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (p0 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.60/1.04      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_085])).
% 0.60/1.04  thf(zip_derived_cl897, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (p1 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0)),
% 0.60/1.04      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl122])).
% 0.60/1.04  thf(zip_derived_cl899, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (q2 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0)),
% 0.60/1.04      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl218, zip_derived_cl897])).
% 0.60/1.04  thf(zip_derived_cl924, plain,
% 0.60/1.04      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: (~ (m0 @ X1 @ X0 @ a) | ~ (q2 @ X1 @ b @ X1))),
% 0.60/1.04      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl853, zip_derived_cl899])).
% 0.60/1.04  thf(zip_derived_cl927, plain, (~ (q2 @ b @ b @ b)),
% 0.60/1.04      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl37, zip_derived_cl924])).
% 0.60/1.04  thf(zip_derived_cl899, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (q2 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0)),
% 0.60/1.04      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl218, zip_derived_cl897])).
% 0.60/1.04  thf(zip_derived_cl929, plain, ($false),
% 0.60/1.04      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl927, zip_derived_cl899])).
% 0.60/1.04  
% 0.60/1.04  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.60/1.04  
% 0.60/1.04  
% 0.60/1.04  % Terminating...
% 2.89/1.13  % Runner terminated.
% 2.89/1.15  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------