↑ Up

Drodi-SAT---4.1.1.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Drodi-SAT---4.1.1
% Problem  : SYN301-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : drodi -satmode(on) -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:19:17 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.39s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN301-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : drodi -satmode(on) -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.34  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:51:02 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  % Drodi V4.1.1
% 0.12/0.39  % Refutation found
% 0.12/0.39  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark: Theory is unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.39  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f37,axiom,(
% 0.12/0.39    n0(b,a) ),
% 0.12/0.39    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f40,axiom,(
% 0.12/0.39    (![G,H]: (( l1(G,G)| ~ n0(H,G) ) ))),
% 0.12/0.39    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f104,axiom,(
% 0.12/0.39    (![G,H]: (( p1(G,G,G)| ~ n0(H,G) ) ))),
% 0.12/0.39    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f175,axiom,(
% 0.12/0.39    (![A,B,C]: (( n2(A)| ~ p1(B,C,A) ) ))),
% 0.12/0.39    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f282,axiom,(
% 0.12/0.39    (![H]: (( p3(H,H,H)| ~ n2(H) ) ))),
% 0.12/0.39    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f337,axiom,(
% 0.12/0.39    (![A,B,C,D]: (( s4(A)| ~ p3(B,C,D)| ~ l1(A,C) ) ))),
% 0.12/0.39    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f369,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.12/0.39    ~ s4(a) ),
% 0.12/0.39    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f406,plain,(
% 0.12/0.39    n0(b,a)),
% 0.12/0.39    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f37])).
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f410,plain,(
% 0.12/0.39    ![G]: (l1(G,G)|(![H]: ~n0(H,G)))),
% 0.12/0.39    inference(miniscoping,[status(thm)],[f40])).
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f411,plain,(
% 0.12/0.39    ![X0,X1]: (l1(X0,X0)|~n0(X1,X0))),
% 0.12/0.39    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f410])).
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f513,plain,(
% 0.12/0.39    ![G]: (p1(G,G,G)|(![H]: ~n0(H,G)))),
% 0.12/0.39    inference(miniscoping,[status(thm)],[f104])).
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f514,plain,(
% 0.12/0.39    ![X0,X1]: (p1(X0,X0,X0)|~n0(X1,X0))),
% 0.12/0.39    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f513])).
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f626,plain,(
% 0.12/0.39    ![A]: (n2(A)|(![B,C]: ~p1(B,C,A)))),
% 0.12/0.39    inference(miniscoping,[status(thm)],[f175])).
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f627,plain,(
% 0.12/0.39    ![X0,X1,X2]: (n2(X0)|~p1(X1,X2,X0))),
% 0.12/0.39    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f626])).
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f784,plain,(
% 0.12/0.39    ![X0]: (p3(X0,X0,X0)|~n2(X0))),
% 0.12/0.39    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f282])).
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f873,plain,(
% 0.12/0.39    ![A,C]: ((s4(A)|(![B,D]: ~p3(B,C,D)))|~l1(A,C))),
% 0.12/0.39    inference(miniscoping,[status(thm)],[f337])).
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f874,plain,(
% 0.12/0.39    ![X0,X1,X2,X3]: (s4(X0)|~p3(X1,X2,X3)|~l1(X0,X2))),
% 0.12/0.39    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f873])).
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f924,plain,(
% 0.12/0.39    ~s4(a)),
% 0.12/0.39    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f369])).
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f934,plain,(
% 0.12/0.39    ![X0,X1,X2,X3]: (~n0(X0,X1)|s4(X1)|~p3(X2,X1,X3))),
% 0.12/0.39    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f411,f874])).
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f956,plain,(
% 0.12/0.39    ![X0,X1]: (~n0(X0,X1)|n2(X1))),
% 0.12/0.39    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f514,f627])).
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f957,plain,(
% 0.12/0.39    n2(a)),
% 0.12/0.39    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f956,f406])).
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f965,plain,(
% 0.12/0.39    p3(a,a,a)),
% 0.12/0.39    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f957,f784])).
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f971,plain,(
% 0.12/0.39    ![X0]: (~n0(X0,a)|s4(a))),
% 0.12/0.39    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f965,f934])).
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f972,plain,(
% 0.12/0.39    ![X0]: (~n0(X0,a))),
% 0.12/0.39    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f971,f924])).
% 0.12/0.39  fof(f974,plain,(
% 0.12/0.39    $false),
% 0.12/0.39    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f406,f972])).
% 0.12/0.39  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 1.39/1.61  % Elapsed time: 1.043365 seconds
% 1.39/1.61  % CPU time: 0.168412 seconds
% 1.39/1.61  % Total memory used: 61.586 MB
% 1.39/1.61  % Net memory used: 61.422 MB
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------