↑ Up

Twee---2.7.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : SYN301-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:47:30 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 6.34s 1.12s
% Output   : Proof 6.34s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN301-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.17  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.17  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.17  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.17  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.17  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.17  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.17  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.17  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 15:41:00 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.18  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.34/1.12  Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 9 --flip-ordering --complete-subsets --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10
% 6.34/1.12  
% 6.34/1.12  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 6.34/1.12  
% 6.34/1.12  % SZS output start Proof
% 6.34/1.12  Axiom 1 (axiom_14): p0(b, X) = true.
% 6.34/1.12  Axiom 2 (axiom_37): n0(b, a) = true.
% 6.34/1.12  Axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 6.34/1.12  Axiom 4 (rule_244): ifeq(n2(X), true, p3(X, X, X), true) = true.
% 6.34/1.12  Axiom 5 (rule_002): ifeq(n0(X, Y), true, l1(Y, Y), true) = true.
% 6.34/1.12  Axiom 6 (rule_137): ifeq(p1(X, Y, Z), true, n2(Z), true) = true.
% 6.34/1.12  Axiom 7 (rule_085): ifeq(p0(X, Y), true, p1(Y, Y, Y), true) = true.
% 6.34/1.12  Axiom 8 (rule_299): ifeq(p3(X, Y, Z), true, ifeq(l1(W, Y), true, s4(W), true), true) = true.
% 6.34/1.12  
% 6.34/1.12  Goal 1 (prove_this): s4(a) = true.
% 6.34/1.12  Proof:
% 6.34/1.12    s4(a)
% 6.34/1.12  = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 6.34/1.12    ifeq(true, true, s4(a), true)
% 6.34/1.12  = { by axiom 4 (rule_244) R->L }
% 6.34/1.12    ifeq(ifeq(n2(a), true, p3(a, a, a), true), true, s4(a), true)
% 6.34/1.12  = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 6.34/1.12    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, n2(a), true), true, p3(a, a, a), true), true, s4(a), true)
% 6.34/1.12  = { by axiom 7 (rule_085) R->L }
% 6.34/1.12    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(p0(b, a), true, p1(a, a, a), true), true, n2(a), true), true, p3(a, a, a), true), true, s4(a), true)
% 6.34/1.12  = { by axiom 1 (axiom_14) }
% 6.34/1.12    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, p1(a, a, a), true), true, n2(a), true), true, p3(a, a, a), true), true, s4(a), true)
% 6.34/1.12  = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 6.34/1.12    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(p1(a, a, a), true, n2(a), true), true, p3(a, a, a), true), true, s4(a), true)
% 6.34/1.12  = { by axiom 6 (rule_137) }
% 6.34/1.13    ifeq(ifeq(true, true, p3(a, a, a), true), true, s4(a), true)
% 6.34/1.13  = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 6.34/1.13    ifeq(p3(a, a, a), true, s4(a), true)
% 6.34/1.13  = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 6.34/1.13    ifeq(p3(a, a, a), true, ifeq(true, true, s4(a), true), true)
% 6.34/1.13  = { by axiom 5 (rule_002) R->L }
% 6.34/1.13    ifeq(p3(a, a, a), true, ifeq(ifeq(n0(b, a), true, l1(a, a), true), true, s4(a), true), true)
% 6.34/1.13  = { by axiom 2 (axiom_37) }
% 6.34/1.13    ifeq(p3(a, a, a), true, ifeq(ifeq(true, true, l1(a, a), true), true, s4(a), true), true)
% 6.34/1.13  = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 6.34/1.13    ifeq(p3(a, a, a), true, ifeq(l1(a, a), true, s4(a), true), true)
% 6.34/1.13  = { by axiom 8 (rule_299) }
% 6.34/1.13    true
% 6.34/1.13  % SZS output end Proof
% 6.34/1.13  
% 6.34/1.13  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------