%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN306-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:33:00 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.27s 10.60s
% Output : Saturation 0.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_6ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_14ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ q(X1)
| r(X2,X1) ),
c_0_6,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( q(g(X1,X1))
| p(X1) ),
clause1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
r(f(X1),X2),
clause4,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( p(X2)
| r(X1,g(X2,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(f(X1))
| p(X1) ),
c_0_10,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ r(a,a),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ p(a),
c_0_13,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SYN306-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/10.48 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.20/10.48 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/10.48 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/10.48 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/10.48 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/10.48 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/10.48 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.20/10.48 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:48:53 UTC 2026
% 0.20/10.48 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/10.48 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.27/10.57 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.27/10.57 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/10.60 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.27/10.60 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/10.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/10.60 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/10.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/10.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/10.60 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/10.60 % sh5l with pid 1558469 completed with status 1
% 0.27/10.60 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.27/10.60 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/10.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/10.60 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/10.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/10.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/10.60 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/10.60 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.27/10.60 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.27/10.60 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.27/10.60 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.27/10.60 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.27/10.60 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1558476 completed with status 1
% 0.27/10.60 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.27/10.60 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/10.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/10.60 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/10.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/10.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/10.60 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/10.60 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.27/10.60 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.27/10.60 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.27/10.60 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.27/10.60 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.27/10.60 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.27/10.60
% 0.27/10.60 % No proof found!
% 0.27/10.60 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.27/10.60 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.27/10.60 % Parsed axioms : 6
% 0.27/10.60 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Initial clauses : 6
% 0.27/10.60 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.27/10.60 % Processed clauses : 7
% 0.27/10.60 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % ...remaining for further processing : 7
% 0.27/10.60 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Generated clauses : 1
% 0.27/10.60 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.27/10.60 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Paramodulations : 1
% 0.27/10.60 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % NegExts : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.27/10.60 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.27/10.60 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.27/10.60 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.27/10.60 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.27/10.60 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.27/10.60 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.27/10.60 % Current number of processed clauses : 7
% 0.27/10.60 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.27/10.60 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.27/10.60 % Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.27/10.60 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.27/10.60 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/10.60 % Termbank termtop insertions : 144
% 0.27/10.60 % Search garbage collected termcells : 13
% 0.27/10.60
% 0.27/10.60 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/10.60 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.27/10.60 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.27/10.60 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.27/10.60 % Maximum resident set size: 3888 pages
% 0.27/10.60
% 0.27/10.60 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/10.60 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.27/10.60 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.27/10.60 % Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.27/10.60 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.27/10.60 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------