↑ Up

Twee---2.7.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : SYN318-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:47:32 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.08s 0.14s
% Output   : Proof 0.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SYN318-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.00/0.10  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.00/0.10  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.00/0.10  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.00/0.10  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.00/0.10  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.00/0.10  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.00/0.10  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.00/0.10  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 15:41:38 UTC 2026
% 0.00/0.10  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.00/0.10  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.14  Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 0.08/0.14  
% 0.08/0.14  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.08/0.14  
% 0.08/0.14  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.08/0.14  Axiom 1 (clause3): f(X) = true.
% 0.08/0.14  Axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 0.08/0.14  Axiom 3 (clause1): ifeq(f(b), true, ifeq(f(X), true, g(X), true), true) = true.
% 0.08/0.14  
% 0.08/0.14  Goal 1 (clause4): g(b) = true.
% 0.08/0.14  Proof:
% 0.08/0.14    g(b)
% 0.08/0.14  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.08/0.14    ifeq(true, true, g(b), true)
% 0.08/0.14  = { by axiom 1 (clause3) R->L }
% 0.08/0.14    ifeq(f(b), true, g(b), true)
% 0.08/0.14  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.08/0.14    ifeq(true, true, ifeq(f(b), true, g(b), true), true)
% 0.08/0.14  = { by axiom 1 (clause3) R->L }
% 0.08/0.14    ifeq(f(b), true, ifeq(f(b), true, g(b), true), true)
% 0.08/0.14  = { by axiom 3 (clause1) }
% 0.08/0.14    true
% 0.08/0.14  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.08/0.14  
% 0.08/0.14  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------