↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SYN319+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:37:32 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   75 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   13 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   89 (  29   ~;  22   |;  24   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (  13 sgn  20   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(church_46_2_5,conjecture,
    ? [X,Y] :
    ! [Z1,Z2] :
      ( ( ( big_f(Y)
         => big_g(Z1) )
       => ( ~ big_f(Z1)
          & big_g(X) ) )
     => ( ( ( big_g(X)
            | big_f(X) )
         => big_h(X) )
       => ( ( big_h(Y)
           => ( ( big_g(Z2)
                | big_f(Z2) )
             => big_h(Z2) ) )
          & big_h(Z2) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',church_46_2_5) ).

fof(church_46_2_5_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X,Y] :
      ! [Z1,Z2] :
        ( ( ( big_f(Y)
           => big_g(Z1) )
         => ( ~ big_f(Z1)
            & big_g(X) ) )
       => ( ( ( big_g(X)
              | big_f(X) )
           => big_h(X) )
         => ( ( big_h(Y)
             => ( ( big_g(Z2)
                  | big_f(Z2) )
               => big_h(Z2) ) )
            & big_h(Z2) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[church_46_2_5]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ! [X,Y] :
    ? [Z1,Z2] :
      ( ( ( ~ big_h(Z2)
          & ( big_g(Z2)
            | big_f(Z2) )
          & big_h(Y) )
        | ~ big_h(Z2) )
      & ( big_h(X)
        | ( ~ big_g(X)
          & ~ big_f(X) ) )
      & ( ( ~ big_f(Z1)
          & big_g(X) )
        | ( ~ big_g(Z1)
          & big_f(Y) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[church_46_2_5_neg]) ).

fof(sk_church_46_2_5_neg_sk,plain,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ( ( ~ big_h(sK0(X,Y))
          & ( big_g(sK0(X,Y))
            | big_f(sK0(X,Y)) )
          & big_h(Y) )
        | ~ big_h(sK0(X,Y)) )
      & ( big_h(X)
        | ( ~ big_g(X)
          & ~ big_f(X) ) )
      & ( ( ~ big_f(sK1(X,Y))
          & big_g(X) )
        | ( ~ big_g(sK1(X,Y))
          & big_f(Y) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK0]),skolemize(Z1,sK1(X,Y)),skolemize(Z2,sK0(X,Y))],[nnf_1]) ).

fof(sk_church_46_2_5_neg,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : ~ big_h(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1))
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( big_h(VAR_0)
        | ~ big_g(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( big_h(VAR_0)
        | ~ big_f(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ big_f(sK1(VAR_0,VAR_1))
        | ~ big_g(sK1(VAR_0,VAR_1)) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( big_g(VAR_0)
        | ~ big_g(sK1(VAR_0,VAR_1)) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ big_f(sK1(VAR_1,VAR_0))
        | big_f(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( big_g(VAR_1)
        | big_f(VAR_0) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_church_46_2_5_neg_sk]) ).

cnf(c_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_h(sK0(A,B)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_church_46_2_5_neg]) ).

cnf(c_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_h(A)
    | ~ big_g(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_church_46_2_5_neg]) ).

cnf(c_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_h(A)
    | ~ big_f(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_church_46_2_5_neg]) ).

cnf(c_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_f(sK0(A,B)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_g(sK0(A,B)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_f(sK1(B,A))
    | big_f(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_church_46_2_5_neg]) ).

cnf(c_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_g(B)
    | big_f(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_church_46_2_5_neg]) ).

cnf(c_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_f(sK1(A,sK0(B,C))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_9,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    big_f(A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_6]) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_12]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN319+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.37  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 17:33:08 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.38  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.13/0.38  % Process 2246918 was started by sandbox on n004,
% 0.13/0.38  % Sat Sep 26 17:33:08 2026
% 0.13/0.38  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.13/0.39  % Length of proof is 11.
% 0.13/0.39  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.13/0.39  % Maximum clause weight is 6.000.
% 0.13/0.39  % Given clauses 6.
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------