↑ Up

hopCoP---0.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : hopCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SYN326+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 25 09:27:24 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.34s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SYN326+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jul 22 15:50:04 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 1
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 2
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 3
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 4
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 5
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 6
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 8
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 7
% 0.12/0.34  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.34  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.12/0.34  fof(church_46_12_1, plain, ?[X]:![Y,Z]:(((big_f(Y,Z)=>(big_g(Y)=>big_h(X)))=>big_f(X,X))=>(((big_f(Z,X)=>big_g(X))=>big_h(Z))=>(big_f(X,Y)=>big_f(Z,Z)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', church_46_12_1)).
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: fof(church_46_12_1_negated, plain, ~(?[X]:![Y,Z]:(((big_f(Y,Z)=>(big_g(Y)=>big_h(X)))=>big_f(X,X))=>(((big_f(Z,X)=>big_g(X))=>big_h(Z))=>(big_f(X,Y)=>big_f(Z,Z))))), inference(negate_conjecture, [status(cth)], [church_46_12_1])).
% 0.12/0.34  9
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 10
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(1, plain, big_f(X0,X0) | big_g(sK1(X0)), inference(cnf, [status(esa)], [church_46_12_1_negated])).
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(l0, plain, big_f(sK2(X0_1),sK2(X0_1)) | big_g(sK1(sK2(X0_1))), inference(instantiation, [status(thm)], [1])).
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(4, plain, ~big_g(X0) | big_h(sK2(X0)), inference(cnf, [status(esa)], [church_46_12_1_negated])).
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(l2, plain, ~big_g(sK1(sK2(X0_1))) | big_h(sK2(sK1(sK2(X0_1)))), inference(instantiation, [status(thm)], [4])).
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(6, plain, ~big_f(sK2(X0),sK2(X0)), inference(cnf, [status(esa)], [church_46_12_1_negated])).
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(l1, plain, ~big_f(sK2(X0_1),sK2(X0_1)), inference(instantiation, [status(thm)], [6])).
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(2, plain, ~big_h(X0) | big_f(X0,X0), inference(cnf, [status(esa)], [church_46_12_1_negated])).
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(l3, plain, ~big_h(sK2(sK1(sK2(X0_1)))) | big_f(sK2(sK1(sK2(X0_1))),sK2(sK1(sK2(X0_1)))), inference(instantiation, [status(thm)], [2])).
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(l4, plain, ~big_f(sK2(sK1(sK2(X0_1))),sK2(sK1(sK2(X0_1)))), inference(instantiation, [status(thm)], [6])).
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(final, plain, $false, inference(ground_refutation, [status(thm)], [l0, l2, l1, l3, l4])).
% 0.12/0.34  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------